Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

best N/A intake manifold, T/B combo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 09:19 AM
  #1  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default best N/A intake manifold, T/B combo

as the title states, what is a good manifold t/b for a high revving b18c5
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 09:27 AM
  #2  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default

ITBs are pretty good for revving
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 09:32 AM
  #3  
neo_'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,676
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Default Re: (RTW DC2R)

Import Builders Intake Manifold with an ITR Maxbore Serviced Throttle Body.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 12:57 PM
  #4  
doood's Avatar
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,885
Likes: 3
From: earth
Default Re: best N/A intake manifold, T/B combo (99em1_sir)

the *best* manifold would be something custom made for your application with a throttle body that wont kill air velocity
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 01:51 PM
  #5  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (RTW DC2R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ITBs are pretty good for revving</TD></TR></TABLE>
Keep in mind this is a stock block, daily driven car with a/c and p/s

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doood &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the *best* manifold would be something custom made for your application with a throttle body that wont kill air velocity</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well other than a super expensive custom set up what whould u recomend.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 01:56 PM
  #6  
doood's Avatar
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,885
Likes: 3
From: earth
Default Re: (neo_)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by neo_ &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Import Builders Intake Manifold with an ITR Maxbore Serviced Throttle Body.</TD></TR></TABLE>

this would be pretty good for a daily driver without a ton of internal work. get a nice header while you're at it.
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #7  
all_motaUSA's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
From: iloilo, Philippines
Default

import builders x2~!
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 03:47 PM
  #8  
iperez's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,238
Likes: 0
From: Bayamon, PR, USA
Default

Now that you mention it, is MaxBore still in business ?? I emailed them about a port job on my TB but I never got an answer..
Reply
Old Jun 2, 2007 | 06:43 PM
  #9  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (doood)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doood &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

this would be pretty good for a daily driver without a ton of internal work. get a nice header while you're at it.</TD></TR></TABLE>

ill look into them more, at the moment im running jun valves, valve springs, chromoly retainers, jun 2's on stock itr intake manifold and t/b.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 09:26 PM
  #10  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

How do you all feel about the edelbrock victor x? i can pick one up real cheap at the moment.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 09:39 PM
  #11  
doood's Avatar
been there done that
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,885
Likes: 3
From: earth
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

the victor x is better suited for high revving, high hp, big displacement engines
Reply
Old Jun 4, 2007 | 12:32 PM
  #12  
MatrixShark's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

I hear good things about a cut/P&P'd/welded ITR intake manifold... but the money is better spent elswhere until things are pretty far along .
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:13 PM
  #13  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (doood)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by doood &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the victor x is better suited for high revving, high hp, big displacement engines</TD></TR></TABLE>

Well this is a high revving motor ( 9,600 rpm) but it is not a "high" horse power beast. remember this is a D/D with a/c.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 06:32 PM
  #14  
92TypeR's Avatar
FSAE
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 1
From: Drinking Beer, UT
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

Do NOT get the VictorX for a 1.8L N/A motor.

An Import Builders of Endyn ported ITR manifold is the best bet for 1.8-2.0 motors. Portmatch it with a 68mm TB and you'll be set.

But IMHO, you will make more power by concentrating on the header first. A good DTR/SMS header will make more power than the best intake manifold.
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 10:17 PM
  #15  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (92TypeR)

Why do u strongly advise against it? i have seen a few charts with nice gains over a stock itr manifold.
Also how much do the import builders unsually run?
Reply
Old Jun 5, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #16  
92TypeR's Avatar
FSAE
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 1
From: Drinking Beer, UT
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99em1_sir &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why do u strongly advise against it? i have seen a few charts with nice gains over a stock itr manifold.
Also how much do the import builders unsually run?</TD></TR></TABLE>

We use VictorX manifolds on both of our highest HP B-series engines, 271 and 288 respectively. We have also used (tested) these manifolds on not-so-built engines, ranging from mild 1.8L to mild 2.0L, in all casese, the VictorX would loose power below ~6500-7000, and only show gains after 8000. To really take advantage of the increased plenum volume and short runners, you need some large cams, good headwork, good header, and lots of compression and displacement, minumum 2.0L and over 12.5:1 CR.

Ported ITR manifolds range in price from $400-600 depending on who you purchase through. I believe the IB manifold is around $500, but makes power everywhere over a stock ITR manifold.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 03:46 AM
  #17  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99em1_sir &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Why do u strongly advise against it? i have seen a few charts with nice gains over a stock itr manifold.
Also how much do the import builders unsually run?</TD></TR></TABLE>

link?

IIRC, any charts I have seen might have gained a few HP on the top end, but the mid range was garbage. the victor X is better suited for a FI application.

&lt;&lt;&lt;did run the victor X on his previous all motor setup however (didnt know any better at the time).
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 04:52 AM
  #18  
George Knighton's Avatar
H-T Order of Merit
 
Joined: Dec 1999
Posts: 96,487
Likes: 38
From: Siege Perilous
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99em1_sir &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Keep in mind this is a stock block, daily driven car with a/c and p/s</TD></TR></TABLE>
The OEM ITR motor already comes with a pretty good intake setup.

Personally, there's so much I'd do before I considered replacing the intake manifold and throttle body. If I were building a B18C, it'd be among the last things I would do, in an effort to get those last 3 HP or so.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:27 AM
  #19  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (George Knighton)

Ok well the motor is curently running jun 2's with a full jun head package, walbro 250, rc 440's and P/P head ect... i was told my high power band could benifit from an edelbrock manifold. im trying to free up a little more power for when i go back to the dyno and i can get this man dirt cheap so its that or i stick with the stock.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 07:37 AM
  #20  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99em1_sir &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Ok well the motor is curently running jun 2's with a full jun head package, walbro 250, rc 440's and P/P head ect... i was told my high power band could benifit from an edelbrock manifold. im trying to free up a little more power for when i go back to the dyno and i can get this man dirt cheap so its that or i stick with the stock.</TD></TR></TABLE>

the walbro and 440s are overkill IMO. if you can get the mani cheap, why not try it out? all setups are different, it may work better for you than others. if it doesnt work, sell it.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 08:23 AM
  #21  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (RTW DC2R)

Well on the dyno the car maxed out the 310's at 98% duty cycle, so i upgraded to 440's. and at the time my tunner told me i whould see good gains from a intake manifold with the large cams.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 08:25 AM
  #22  
RTW DC2R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 18,151
Likes: 2
From: Hollywood Babylon
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99em1_sir &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well on the dyno the car maxed out the 310's at 98% duty cycle, so i upgraded to 440's. and at the time my tunner told me i whould see good gains from a intake manifold with the large cams.</TD></TR></TABLE>

maxed out 310s? how much whp is the car making? those cams arent that large though, and you would want more compression as well to get the most out of that mani, which as already been suggested.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:33 AM
  #23  
99em1_sir's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
From: texas, usa
Default Re: (RTW DC2R)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

maxed out 310s? how much whp is the car making? those cams arent that large though, and you would want more compression as well to get the most out of that mani, which as already been suggested. </TD></TR></TABLE>

I was told the car made around 200whp but im not %100 on the exact numbers.
Soon the bottom end will get a total rebuild with more comp.
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:46 AM
  #24  
4LugR's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,506
Likes: 0
From: NoR CaL, United States
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

440's will be perfect.. im at 290cc's and mine are maxed, im at 210 hp, and i was thinking of getting a victor x mani, and 440's also.. right now im running a PnP'd blox, matched with a 72mm rpm tb. and i too was told that i would benefit from a victor x mani
Reply
Old Jun 6, 2007 | 10:53 AM
  #25  
Big Phat R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 6,929
Likes: 2
From: Kelowna Canada
Default Re: (99em1_sir)

I have the Import Builders IM - it was one of the LAST mods I did on my fully built 2.0L car.

I agree with G. Knighton in that the stock IM is fairly good - but if you must have that last bit of hp then go for it - the difference is quite noticeable.

Import Builders:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/47305622@N00/321914397/http://www.flickr.com/photos/47305622@N00/321914409/

Stock:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/47305622@N00/445069468/
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:21 AM.