top end vs. low & mid range?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Jun 2, 2007 | 07:29 AM

94typeR

Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 433

Likes: 0

top end vs. low & mid range?

would you guys agree that low & midrange has a big effect on 1/4 times compared to top end alone?

Jun 2, 2007 | 07:40 AM

adseguy

Member

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 2,992

Likes: 0

From: Nashville, TN, U.S.A

Re: top end vs. low & mid range? (94typeR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 94typeR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">would you guys agree that low & midrange has a big effect on 1/4 times compared to top end alone?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Complete opposite haha

Think about it just a little

Jun 2, 2007 | 07:46 AM

tony1

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: May 2002

Posts: 15,814

Likes: 8

From: Dallas, TX, USA

Re: top end vs. low & mid range? (adseguy)

I never see less than 7k on the track...

Jun 2, 2007 | 09:11 AM

Schister66

Man U FTW

Joined: Sep 2005

Posts: 11,973

Likes: 2

From: Phoenix, AZ

low end and midrange is good for the street and for road racing...

Drag racing is all top end

Jun 2, 2007 | 09:40 AM

94typeR

Thread Starter

Joined: Mar 2007

Posts: 433

Likes: 0

Re: (Schister66)

i was just thinking about it when i was comparing high hp NA graphs to same hp turbo graphs.

only thing i could think of was the lack of midrange and lowend on the turbo that the NA has.