which offset / size would u choose...
16 x 7.0 +40 5h x 114.3 (would this work if i got all 4.. no rolling fenders and moderate to low drop..)
17 x 7.5 +35/+45 5h x 114.3
17 x 8.5 +35/+40/+50 5h x 114.3
18 x 7.5 +35/+45/+48 5h x 114.3
18 x 8.0 +35/+42/+48 5h x 114.3
18 x 9.0 +35/+45/+48/+50 5h x 114.3
Modified by J.nguyen at 6:53 PM 5/16/2007
17 x 7.5 +35/+45 5h x 114.3
17 x 8.5 +35/+40/+50 5h x 114.3
18 x 7.5 +35/+45/+48 5h x 114.3
18 x 8.0 +35/+42/+48 5h x 114.3
18 x 9.0 +35/+45/+48/+50 5h x 114.3
Modified by J.nguyen at 6:53 PM 5/16/2007
Can you post some more sizes and offsets? I dont think there are enough to choose from.
ARE YOU JOKING comeon common sense would cross out half of that crap why waste yours/our time?
17 x 7.5 +45
17 x 8.5 +40
ARE YOU JOKING comeon common sense would cross out half of that crap why waste yours/our time?
17 x 7.5 +45
17 x 8.5 +40
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Can you post some more sizes and offsets? I dont think there are enough to choose from.
ARE YOU JOKING comeon common sense would cross out half of that crap why waste yours/our time?
17 x 7.5 +45
17 x 8.5 +40</TD></TR></TABLE>
sorry just copy and pasted didnt have time to edit em out.
but thanks for the choices. guess tahts the best choice
ARE YOU JOKING comeon common sense would cross out half of that crap why waste yours/our time?
17 x 7.5 +45
17 x 8.5 +40</TD></TR></TABLE>
sorry just copy and pasted didnt have time to edit em out.
but thanks for the choices. guess tahts the best choice
Its my opinion of best choice. All depends on what look, or function you are going for. What is your goal?
p.s. your old DC2 is beautiful.
p.s. your old DC2 is beautiful.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Its my opinion of best choice. All depends on what look, or function you are going for. What is your goal?
p.s. your old DC2 is beautiful. </TD></TR></TABLE>
overall best of the best function / form
aha thanks. damn everytime someone says something about my old car, makes me miss it even more.. ahh but s2k outweights it all
p.s. your old DC2 is beautiful. </TD></TR></TABLE>
overall best of the best function / form
aha thanks. damn everytime someone says something about my old car, makes me miss it even more.. ahh but s2k outweights it all
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Can you post some more sizes and offsets? I dont think there are enough to choose from.
ARE YOU JOKING comeon common sense would cross out half of that crap why waste yours/our time?
17 x 7.5 +45
17 x 8.5 +40</TD></TR></TABLE>
or even +35 rear its only a 8.5 rim
ARE YOU JOKING comeon common sense would cross out half of that crap why waste yours/our time?
17 x 7.5 +45
17 x 8.5 +40</TD></TR></TABLE>
or even +35 rear its only a 8.5 rim
Trending Topics
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ic thanks 
i wanted 17 x9 +45 R
but they dont have it =\</TD></TR></TABLE>
with teh 8.5's on a +35 offset it will give the same "look" as the +45 x9's

i wanted 17 x9 +45 R
but they dont have it =\</TD></TR></TABLE>
with teh 8.5's on a +35 offset it will give the same "look" as the +45 x9's
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S@nt0s »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
with teh 8.5's on a +35 offset it will give the same "look" as the +45 x9's</TD></TR></TABLE>
oic
35 or 40 for rear.. hmmm
with teh 8.5's on a +35 offset it will give the same "look" as the +45 x9's</TD></TR></TABLE>
oic
35 or 40 for rear.. hmmm
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">true yeah that sounds better actually. What wheels and how much of a drop do you plan? </TD></TR></TABLE>
for right now, its on espelir springs.. wont get coil overs for another year.. ahah so my drop is moderate
also double check.. tire size should be :205/45/17 F and 235/40/17 R right?
for right now, its on espelir springs.. wont get coil overs for another year.. ahah so my drop is moderate
also double check.. tire size should be :205/45/17 F and 235/40/17 R right?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S@nt0s »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">215x45 front 245x40 rear... </TD></TR></TABLE>
even if i went with the 35+ offset in rear?
ic thanks.. i was just using this as my guide: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...42793
dunno about s2k's but is falken ziex tires good with them?
even if i went with the 35+ offset in rear?
ic thanks.. i was just using this as my guide: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...42793
dunno about s2k's but is falken ziex tires good with them?
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
even if i went with the 35+ offset in rear?
ic thanks.. i was just using this as my guide: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...42793</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes even with teh +35 rear.. roll the fenders and a lil camber and your set
even if i went with the 35+ offset in rear?
ic thanks.. i was just using this as my guide: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...42793</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes even with teh +35 rear.. roll the fenders and a lil camber and your set
okay, let the wheel jock through
Of these sizes, your best bet is to run (clearance) would be:
17 x 7.5 +45 5h x 114.3
17 x 8.5 +50 5h x 114.3
You can sucessfully run stock AP2 tire sizes of 245/215 combo with this set up
255 is also do-able too, but you will rub if you hit deep dips or crevices in the street with non rolled fenders. other than that, daily driving is perf
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">16 x 7.0 +40 5h x 114.3 (would this work if i got all 4.. no rolling fenders and moderate to low drop..)?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stick with traditional staggered set ups. It will work but your car will drive like *** especially running 7's all around. You can get away with running staggered tire set ups but I say squash this set up:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S@nt0s »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
with the 8.5's on a +35 offset it will give the same "look" as the +45 x9's</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes yes, but the 8.5 +35 is way more aggressive than a 9+45. If running this set up, It should stick out about 1/8 inch more than a 9+45.
the closest set up that come's close to a 9+45 is an 8.5 +40 with a differenece of 1 mm
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for right now, its on espelir springs.. wont get coil overs for another year.. ahah so my drop is moderate
also double check.. tire size should be :205/45/17 F and 235/40/17 R right?</TD></TR></TABLE>
If running a 9+45, on non rolled fenders, 235-40-17 is your best bet (that is if your tucking) If you have finger gaps, 245-40 would be better but you will have your occasional rubs.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
even if i went with the 35+ offset in rear?
ic thanks.. i was just using this as my guide: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...42793
dunno about s2k's but is falken ziex tires good with them? </TD></TR></TABLE>
1) Don't use the wheel fitment guide. Its been way outdated. Talk to me If you need help
2) Falken Ziex are sorry *** tires lol. RT615's are best, or if you can find the OG, RT215's like me. If not, settle for Falken FK452's.
Let me know
Of these sizes, your best bet is to run (clearance) would be:
17 x 7.5 +45 5h x 114.3
17 x 8.5 +50 5h x 114.3
You can sucessfully run stock AP2 tire sizes of 245/215 combo with this set up
255 is also do-able too, but you will rub if you hit deep dips or crevices in the street with non rolled fenders. other than that, daily driving is perf
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">16 x 7.0 +40 5h x 114.3 (would this work if i got all 4.. no rolling fenders and moderate to low drop..)?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Stick with traditional staggered set ups. It will work but your car will drive like *** especially running 7's all around. You can get away with running staggered tire set ups but I say squash this set up:
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S@nt0s »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
with the 8.5's on a +35 offset it will give the same "look" as the +45 x9's</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes yes, but the 8.5 +35 is way more aggressive than a 9+45. If running this set up, It should stick out about 1/8 inch more than a 9+45.
the closest set up that come's close to a 9+45 is an 8.5 +40 with a differenece of 1 mm
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for right now, its on espelir springs.. wont get coil overs for another year.. ahah so my drop is moderate
also double check.. tire size should be :205/45/17 F and 235/40/17 R right?</TD></TR></TABLE>
If running a 9+45, on non rolled fenders, 235-40-17 is your best bet (that is if your tucking) If you have finger gaps, 245-40 would be better but you will have your occasional rubs.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
even if i went with the 35+ offset in rear?
ic thanks.. i was just using this as my guide: http://www.s2ki.com/forums/ind...42793
dunno about s2k's but is falken ziex tires good with them? </TD></TR></TABLE>
1) Don't use the wheel fitment guide. Its been way outdated. Talk to me If you need help
2) Falken Ziex are sorry *** tires lol. RT615's are best, or if you can find the OG, RT215's like me. If not, settle for Falken FK452's.
Let me know
Ohh yes. I have a pair of NSX Spec/BBK Spec Regamasters for sale for the s2000
Only a pair though. Check the FS forum.
17x8 +35. Either run a 205-45-17 stretch on that 8" on non rolled fenders or a 215-45 with rolled front fenders
Only a pair though. Check the FS forum.
17x8 +35. Either run a 205-45-17 stretch on that 8" on non rolled fenders or a 215-45 with rolled front fenders
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by OBSeRiouSo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
yes yes, but the 8.5 +35 is way more aggressive than a 9+45. If running this set up, It should stick out about 1/8 inch more than a 9+45.
the closest set up that come's close to a 9+45 is an 8.5 +40 with a differenece of 1 mm
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes i know its more aggressive but he can still do with with the +35 235x40's with some roll, or 245's with roll and camber...
yes yes, but the 8.5 +35 is way more aggressive than a 9+45. If running this set up, It should stick out about 1/8 inch more than a 9+45.
the closest set up that come's close to a 9+45 is an 8.5 +40 with a differenece of 1 mm
</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes i know its more aggressive but he can still do with with the +35 235x40's with some roll, or 245's with roll and camber...
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by J.nguyen »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ic thanks 
i wanted 17 x9 +45 R
but they dont have it =\</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what I have, and its a tight fit. I have to roll my rears again, and im only running a 245/40 back there.

i wanted 17 x9 +45 R
but they dont have it =\</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what I have, and its a tight fit. I have to roll my rears again, and im only running a 245/40 back there.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S2K1985 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yo nguyen you live in mira mesa right?? your friends with Justin Z. anyways do you know any hook up for rims or exhaust system? </TD></TR></TABLE>
yeah
rims or exhaust system for an S2k? haha naa im lookin for rims and **** too
yeah
rims or exhaust system for an S2k? haha naa im lookin for rims and **** too
oohh.. iight i thought you might know any hook ups... well iight ill just go to panda garage they might have something there..hehe.. nice meeting you though..
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by S@nt0s »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes i know its more aggressive but he can still do with with the +35 235x40's with some roll, or 245's with roll and camber...</TD></TR></TABLE>
of course of course. Im not saying that your wrong
You know your shiet. Im just adding additional info you forgot to say
of course of course. Im not saying that your wrong
You know your shiet. Im just adding additional info you forgot to say
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by OBSeRiouSo »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
of course of course. Im not saying that your wrong
You know your shiet. Im just adding additional info you forgot to say
</TD></TR></TABLE>
course homie we are both jsut trying to be understood...
of course of course. Im not saying that your wrong
You know your shiet. Im just adding additional info you forgot to say
</TD></TR></TABLE>course homie we are both jsut trying to be understood...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PURP
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
2
Nov 3, 2009 09:37 AM
OPTION2ek V.2
Northern California (Sales)
0
Feb 26, 2008 07:20 PM




