boosted d or b series?
just tryin to get some info together bout em and see whats out there? i can get y hands on all the piping and an evo 16g turbo for a good price...im leaning more towards the boost because of cost and much easier to install
Modified by brentaction22 at 8:40 PM 5/7/2007
Modified by brentaction22 at 8:40 PM 5/7/2007

Christ on a crutch can no one think for themselves?
I was guilty of the same thing when i was new to the scene. So I can't gripe too much.
RESEARCH!!! Find out what fit's your budget/driving style/skill.
I want to go h2b because It's not that common and i don't have to rev to 9,000 rpms to get power. It's also got a lot of torque (for a 4 banger) which makes for a good track car.
All depends on what you want to do with it and gow much time/money you have.
/thread.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Christ on a crutch can no one think for themselves?
I was guilty of the same thing when i was new to the scene. So I can't gripe too much.
RESEARCH!!! Find out what fit's your budget/driving style/skill.
I want to go h2b because It's not that common and i don't have to rev to 9,000 rpms to get power. It's also got a lot of torque (for a 4 banger) which makes for a good track car.
All depends on what you want to do with it and gow much time/money you have.
/thread.</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1977148
The EXACT god damn thread!
PLEASE...RESEARCH!!!!
For Christ sake, two threads on the same page of the forum!

Christ on a crutch can no one think for themselves?
I was guilty of the same thing when i was new to the scene. So I can't gripe too much.
RESEARCH!!! Find out what fit's your budget/driving style/skill.
I want to go h2b because It's not that common and i don't have to rev to 9,000 rpms to get power. It's also got a lot of torque (for a 4 banger) which makes for a good track car.
All depends on what you want to do with it and gow much time/money you have.
/thread.</TD></TR></TABLE>
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread/1977148
The EXACT god damn thread!
PLEASE...RESEARCH!!!!
For Christ sake, two threads on the same page of the forum!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Christ on a crutch can no one think for themselves?
I was guilty of the same thing when i was new to the scene. So I can't gripe too much.
RESEARCH!!! Find out what fit's your budget/driving style/skill.
I want to go h2b because It's not that common and i don't have to rev to 9,000 rpms to get power. It's also got a lot of torque (for a 4 banger) which makes for a good track car.
All depends on what you want to do with it and gow much time/money you have.
/thread.</TD></TR></TABLE>
AAHH

Christ on a crutch can no one think for themselves?
I was guilty of the same thing when i was new to the scene. So I can't gripe too much.
RESEARCH!!! Find out what fit's your budget/driving style/skill.
I want to go h2b because It's not that common and i don't have to rev to 9,000 rpms to get power. It's also got a lot of torque (for a 4 banger) which makes for a good track car.
All depends on what you want to do with it and gow much time/money you have.
/thread.</TD></TR></TABLE>
AAHH
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
he suggested bolting the turbo between the intake manifold and the actual cold air intake.that didnt work.suggestions?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Are you kidding me,, the guy actually considered bolting the turbo itself between the intake manifold and the cold air intake?
he suggested bolting the turbo between the intake manifold and the actual cold air intake.that didnt work.suggestions?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Are you kidding me,, the guy actually considered bolting the turbo itself between the intake manifold and the cold air intake?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cookie »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Are you kidding me,, the guy actually considered bolting the turbo itself between the intake manifold and the cold air intake?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I saw that thread too. Back in the day.
Take a clip of it and do an archived search in post bodies, it' funny ****.
Are you kidding me,, the guy actually considered bolting the turbo itself between the intake manifold and the cold air intake?
</TD></TR></TABLE>I saw that thread too. Back in the day.
Take a clip of it and do an archived search in post bodies, it' funny ****.
Trending Topics
I know,, nothing ceases to amaze me. I recently saw an ad for some hair-dryer/turbine devise that you put into the tail pipe.
Oh yeah,, that is where horsepower is developed!
Oh yeah,, that is where horsepower is developed!
Now on an economical side of this coin -I was talking to a well know engine guru (one that used to have his own UBB but bailed on it because it was like baby-sitting, he said) on the phone last week,,
and he said that he knew of a friend that was running a turbocharged D16Z6 with 11:1 compression with 285horse and was getting 38 in city/50 highway.
Now there is a perfect balance for these times of high fuel costs. P/W ratio of 8.5 and still gets 50 on the highway. Nice.
and he said that he knew of a friend that was running a turbocharged D16Z6 with 11:1 compression with 285horse and was getting 38 in city/50 highway.
Now there is a perfect balance for these times of high fuel costs. P/W ratio of 8.5 and still gets 50 on the highway. Nice.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cookie »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
and he said that he knew of a friend that was running a turbocharged D16Z6 with 11:1 compression with 285horse and was getting 38 in city/50 highway.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
Maybe if he was running really low amounts of boost he might get a mpg increase.
but pushing in that much air demands more fuel.
There's no logical way for him to have so much bettr mpg.
and he said that he knew of a friend that was running a turbocharged D16Z6 with 11:1 compression with 285horse and was getting 38 in city/50 highway.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
Maybe if he was running really low amounts of boost he might get a mpg increase.
but pushing in that much air demands more fuel.
There's no logical way for him to have so much bettr mpg.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Cookie »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">and he said that he knew of a friend that was running a turbocharged D16Z6 with 11:1 compression with 285horse and was getting 38 in city/50 highway.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no way on the mpg
no way on the mpg
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by brentaction22 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeah my buddy is gettin an ek hatch and is doin an h to b setup...sposed to be silly...thanks for the info </TD></TR></TABLE>
This is a good setup...they just finished the mounts for the H2B setup for EK's.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
Maybe if he was running really low amounts of boost he might get a mpg increase.
but pushing in that much air demands more fuel.
There's no logical way for him to have so much bettr mpg.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Word.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 97Ej6mike »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But you really cant match that up with a boosted B series</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ah sure ya can!
It just depends on who's willing to throw down more money
This is a good setup...they just finished the mounts for the H2B setup for EK's.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
Maybe if he was running really low amounts of boost he might get a mpg increase.
but pushing in that much air demands more fuel.
There's no logical way for him to have so much bettr mpg.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Word.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 97Ej6mike »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But you really cant match that up with a boosted B series</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ah sure ya can!
It just depends on who's willing to throw down more money
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ek forever guy »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
Maybe if he was running really low amounts of boost he might get a mpg increase.
but pushing in that much air demands more fuel.
There's no logical way for him to have so much better mpg.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ek forever guy, yeah, well, normally I wouldn't believe most people that would blurt out words like that, but since you didn't figure it out WHO the person was I will tell you, it was Larry Widmer of Endyn. And if he said that,, I would tend to believe him over normal logic and reason. It seemed a bit out landish to me, but that was the topic of our conversation -
My dilemma; wanting to have decent performance but NOT wanting to lose the gas mileage. Q; Was/Is there a way to get good or better horsepower but not sacrifice mileage or better yet could mileage be better than stock?
You did hit the nail on the head with smaller boost numbers, but the pencil is just touching the paper at this time between myself and him, so we shall see where it all lands.
I wouldn't believe it for a minute.
Maybe if he was running really low amounts of boost he might get a mpg increase.
but pushing in that much air demands more fuel.
There's no logical way for him to have so much better mpg.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ek forever guy, yeah, well, normally I wouldn't believe most people that would blurt out words like that, but since you didn't figure it out WHO the person was I will tell you, it was Larry Widmer of Endyn. And if he said that,, I would tend to believe him over normal logic and reason. It seemed a bit out landish to me, but that was the topic of our conversation -
My dilemma; wanting to have decent performance but NOT wanting to lose the gas mileage. Q; Was/Is there a way to get good or better horsepower but not sacrifice mileage or better yet could mileage be better than stock?
You did hit the nail on the head with smaller boost numbers, but the pencil is just touching the paper at this time between myself and him, so we shall see where it all lands.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1995Civic »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">This is a good setup...they just finished the mounts for the H2B setup for EK's.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You have no Idea how excited that makes me.
h22's in eg's bone stock with a good o2 sensor and a tune up get ~30mpg
And most of the eg guys that have the h2b setups are breaking below 13's
</TD></TR></TABLE>
You have no Idea how excited that makes me.
h22's in eg's bone stock with a good o2 sensor and a tune up get ~30mpg
And most of the eg guys that have the h2b setups are breaking below 13's
wut motor do you haveright now? if you have a d16 the boost that, but build it too.
if you have a d15 or something and you have enough money get a b16 and build that too(stock high compresion), not good for turbo. if you leave it stock and turbo it you'll get the HP but not the torque.
if you have a d15 or something and you have enough money get a b16 and build that too(stock high compresion), not good for turbo. if you leave it stock and turbo it you'll get the HP but not the torque.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




