camp 1320 header
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">maybe.....just maybe..... http://www.camp1320.com</TD></TR></TABLE>
nice!
nice!
holy ****. 475 for those. if the dyno is right on those headers and you see those gains than for that price those headers are amazing
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sivikvtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeaaa
no proven results
over 200whp on an untuned ecu
i call madd bs
</TD></TR></TABLE>
i could careless what the engine makes. There have been stock internal motors making over 200whp. Thats all on the dyno. But a dyno will not lie about how much power you gain in a true comparison, which has not been done for this header. I would really like to see what kinda power it makes.
no proven results
over 200whp on an untuned ecu
i call madd bs
</TD></TR></TABLE>i could careless what the engine makes. There have been stock internal motors making over 200whp. Thats all on the dyno. But a dyno will not lie about how much power you gain in a true comparison, which has not been done for this header. I would really like to see what kinda power it makes.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sivikvtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yeaaa
no proven results
over 200whp on an untuned ecu
i call madd bs </TD></TR></TABLE>
What kind of proof do you need. I posted the dyno graphs right there for you to look at it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i could careless what the engine makes. There have been stock internal motors making over 200whp. Thats all on the dyno. But a dyno will not lie about how much power you gain in a true comparison, which has not been done for this header. I would really like to see what kinda power it makes.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I offered to do comparisons if people would give me the header and 60$ for the dyno time. No one stepped up. so im not goign to loose out of pocket on it. I have pulled on any prelude i have ever raced, anywhere from 3 to 6 car lenghts. I know it made power on my motor, if you are a sceptic buy one and try it out.
no proven results
over 200whp on an untuned ecu
i call madd bs </TD></TR></TABLE>
What kind of proof do you need. I posted the dyno graphs right there for you to look at it.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
i could careless what the engine makes. There have been stock internal motors making over 200whp. Thats all on the dyno. But a dyno will not lie about how much power you gain in a true comparison, which has not been done for this header. I would really like to see what kinda power it makes.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I offered to do comparisons if people would give me the header and 60$ for the dyno time. No one stepped up. so im not goign to loose out of pocket on it. I have pulled on any prelude i have ever raced, anywhere from 3 to 6 car lenghts. I know it made power on my motor, if you are a sceptic buy one and try it out.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mgags7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why would you buy one if you were a skeptic?
come see if you pull 3-6 cars on me....lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you running a stock weight, stock internaled prelude? If so, lets meet up. Im in Oklahoma, where are you located?
come see if you pull 3-6 cars on me....lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you running a stock weight, stock internaled prelude? If so, lets meet up. Im in Oklahoma, where are you located?
hahaha. Well i guess my post was misleading. I pull 3 - 6 on stock weight, stock internal preludes. Mine is 4ws model so its extra fat, with me it weighs in around 3150lbs.
All I'm saying is that there's no proof. No before/after TUNED dyno results, same dyno, same day. That in itself makes your posting of dyno plots useless.
Instead of being a ricer wanna be street racer, go to the track and see if you can hit the low 14's like precisionelite and 98vtec
Instead of being a ricer wanna be street racer, go to the track and see if you can hit the low 14's like precisionelite and 98vtec
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sivikvtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">All I'm saying is that there's no proof. No before/after TUNED dyno results, same dyno, same day. That in itself makes your posting of dyno plots useless.
Instead of being a ricer wanna be street racer, go to the track and see if you can hit the low 14's like precisionelite and 98vtec
</TD></TR></TABLE>
why dont u pay for the dyno time and tuning then maybe we could get more positive results instead of bagging on a guy who went out of his way to post his dyno results on the header that he paid the dyno time and tuning for.....dont u realize it costs to do this?
Instead of being a ricer wanna be street racer, go to the track and see if you can hit the low 14's like precisionelite and 98vtec
</TD></TR></TABLE>
why dont u pay for the dyno time and tuning then maybe we could get more positive results instead of bagging on a guy who went out of his way to post his dyno results on the header that he paid the dyno time and tuning for.....dont u realize it costs to do this?
I bought a good header....
I don't need to see dyno results of an inferior product.
Everybody acts like this thing is god's gift to the world when it hasn't been proven to do crap. Who's to say with a DC header on that same dyno, same day wouldn't put down the same numbers. Nobody knows for sure.
I don't need to see dyno results of an inferior product.
Everybody acts like this thing is god's gift to the world when it hasn't been proven to do crap. Who's to say with a DC header on that same dyno, same day wouldn't put down the same numbers. Nobody knows for sure.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sivikvtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">All I'm saying is that there's no proof. No before/after TUNED dyno results, same dyno, same day. That in itself makes your posting of dyno plots useless.
Instead of being a ricer wanna be street racer, go to the track and see if you can hit the low 14's like precisionelite and 98vtec
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I did go to the track. All i got was 2 runs, so I need practice launching my car. my time was 15.00 at 97 mph with a 2.45 60ft time. And all that on stock suspension. with a litle better suspension, some stickier tires, and better 60 ft times, i will be mid to low 14's. if i gut my interior to shave a few lbs, i dont see a problem hitting a low 14.
Instead of being a ricer wanna be street racer, go to the track and see if you can hit the low 14's like precisionelite and 98vtec
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I did go to the track. All i got was 2 runs, so I need practice launching my car. my time was 15.00 at 97 mph with a 2.45 60ft time. And all that on stock suspension. with a litle better suspension, some stickier tires, and better 60 ft times, i will be mid to low 14's. if i gut my interior to shave a few lbs, i dont see a problem hitting a low 14.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by preludestud11 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I did go to the track. All i got was 2 runs, so I need practice launching my car. my time was 15.00 at 97 mph with a 2.45 60ft time. And all that on stock suspension. with a litle better suspension, some stickier tires, and better 60 ft times, i will be mid to low 14's. if i gut my interior to shave a few lbs, i dont see a problem hitting a low 14.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you should hit easily hit 13's with the proper tire and suspension setup. Considering your "astonishing" dyno numbers, you should eat 13.5's for lunch. If you dont, then you know how off the dyno is
I did go to the track. All i got was 2 runs, so I need practice launching my car. my time was 15.00 at 97 mph with a 2.45 60ft time. And all that on stock suspension. with a litle better suspension, some stickier tires, and better 60 ft times, i will be mid to low 14's. if i gut my interior to shave a few lbs, i dont see a problem hitting a low 14.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you should hit easily hit 13's with the proper tire and suspension setup. Considering your "astonishing" dyno numbers, you should eat 13.5's for lunch. If you dont, then you know how off the dyno is
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98vtec »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you should hit easily hit 13's with the proper tire and suspension setup. Considering your "astonishing" dyno numbers, you should eat 13.5's for lunch. If you dont, then you know how off the dyno is
</TD></TR></TABLE>
well considering his bad 60ft, his less mods, and more weight...he trapped higher than you!
thats if he didnt round up...
times tell you how well you drove your car.
traps tell you how much power your car has (considering the weight)
</TD></TR></TABLE>well considering his bad 60ft, his less mods, and more weight...he trapped higher than you!
thats if he didnt round up...times tell you how well you drove your car.
traps tell you how much power your car has (considering the weight)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GraphiteMW »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">lol ive seen h23's do 15's</TD></TR></TABLE>
have u seen h23's trap at 97?
have u seen h23's trap at 97?
Im not here to defend myself or the power that my car made. I dont know if the dyno reads high or not. with my h23 setup I ran a 15.6 at 84 mph. with my turbo h23 i ran 13.8 @ 101mph. Iwill try and get more track time with some better tires to see what it is really capable of.




