have any of you guys ever raced one of those newer sentra se-rs? my friend has a 2003 sentra se-r and is really confident and cocky about beating my type r. his mods are: Intake, Exhaust, header. my mods are the same. he says he will smash gsrs and even type rs. what do you think?

 

no..... hell no

 

i tried telling him. he is too cocky and picks on d-series civics or ls integras. he keeps saying "well my car has a lot of torque"

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlueStar &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i tried telling him. he is too cocky and picks on d-series civics or ls integras. he keeps saying "well my car has a lot of torque"</TD></TR></TABLE>

Tell him, "So, mine has vTak".

 

Take it to a strip and find out...

 

the se-r can nevar loseeeeee........no wait that another car

 

it may be an alright race.each motor varies, some are stonger than others, goes for both, odds are if you have a well maintained, low mileage R you should have no problem walking him

 

umm not so much. itr FTW.

 

This **** should be locked but.
You will scrape an SE-R, WITH NO PROBLEMS.


Modified by NBPdEeCeE at 7:50 PM 4/20/2007

 

in for the race!

 

stop bench racing and find out for yourself.

 

i raced a swapped ser motor into a older model sentra supposedly lighter and walked on it no problem. i think it was like at least 5 cars.

this was when my car was bone stock with about 30k on it. now it has 40k.

 

1992 Nissan Sentra SE-R 8.1 16.2
1993 Nissan Sentra SE-R 7.6 15.8
1994 Nissan Sentra SE-R 7.4 15.8
2001 Nissan Sentra SE 2.0 7.9 16.0 (R&T Online)
2002 Nissan Sentra SE-R 7.2 15.4
2003 Nissan Sentra SE-R Spec V 7.3 15.6


those are the 0-60 times, and 1/4 mile for the se-r and what not and

here are the 0-60 times, and 1/4 for all integra's

1986 Acura Integra RS 9.3 17.0
1986 Acura Integra LS 8.8 16.5
1989 Acura Integra LS 9.3 17.1
1990 Acura Integra 3-Dr GS 9.2 16.8
1990 Acura Integra GS 8.9 16.6
1992 Acura Integra GS-R 6.8 15.4
1993 Acura Integra GS-R 6.5 15.2
1994 Acura Integra GS-R 7.1 15.5
1994 Acura Integra LS 7.6 16.0
1996 Acura Integra GS-R 7.1 15.5
1996 Acura Integra SE 7.9 16.1
1997 Acura Integra Type R 6.5 14.7

14.7 for the R in 97 im sure they were faster in 98 due to sound deadening bullcrap was gone and also ac and whatnot correct if im wrong.

 

Its funny when people compare new cars to the ITR. They have had ten years to copy the car and still nobody has come close.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlueStar &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> what do you think? </TD></TR></TABLE>

I think you should take it to the track! R vs *** post are teh ghey.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by grjp1988 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> 97 im sure they were faster in 98 due to sound deadening bullcrap was gone and also ac and whatnot correct if im wrong.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

You are wrong.

 

You're talking about straight line racing, but here's more info for your buddy: When the new Spec V's came out they were put in the same SCCA autocross class as the ITRs (D Stock).
Autocross has at least as much to do with handling as it does straight line acceleration, but after a couple years of not being able to keep up, the Spec V's were moved to the slower G Stock class, where the gsr and rsx-s run.

 

ITR FTW!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by I love lamp. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ITR FTW!</TD></TR></TABLE>

x2

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Jon D &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I think you should take it to the track! R vs *** post are teh ghey. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Thought this tread would be locked by the time I got online today

 

If you can drive you should EASILY beat him by at LEAST 3 cars

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by grjp1988 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">14.7 for the R in 97 im sure they were faster in 98 due to sound deadening bullcrap was gone and also ac and whatnot correct if im wrong.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

WTF are you talking about?

 

instead of saying "wtf are you talking about" like most of you **** bags do just say no the 97 and 98 models were the the same besides the front and rear bumpers.

 

um no

 

here take it from me. I own a 02 Spec V. The thing feels fast cuz its got torque, but its so ******* slow. 2nd gear is nice, but 3rd gear just dies down. the car cant rev worth of crap either. youll smoke him so hard he wouldnt know what hittem