To make long story short I ran 159/121 on a Mustang dyno today. I honestly felt that the numbers are kind of low. The guy who was working told me Mustang dynos read lower. The thing is its still prolly acurate and not much lower than for example a dynojet. what do you guys say?

UPDATE
Today I went to UD motors and jumped on their Dyna V1 Dynajet and brought up this number 163/124........???? Nothing seems consistent.


Modified by John 07 at 9:07 PM 3/12/2007


Modified by John 07 at 9:08 PM 3/12/2007


Modified by John 07 at 9:28 PM 3/12/2007

 

Sounds about right on the money.

 

dont feel so bad, you gotta remember thats a decent amoount of power for a stock NA i remeber reading a article in sport compact the did a dyno run on a bone stock 2002 subaru wrx its baseline was like 168/ i dont remeber the turqueand thats 2.0 turbo. . TYPE R's R best

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Willard &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Sounds about right on the money.

</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

Compression results? Mileage?

But as mentioned... sounds about right.

 

Sounds right on the money. I've seen numbers as low as 140whp up to like 169whp on a bone stock ITR.

 

thats right on man...mustang dynos do read i believe 15% lower or something like that...regardless on any dyno if your stock engine is putting out over 170whp then your a lucky bastard haha. Most stock dynos are in the low to mid 160's

 

good deal man i bet it sounded awesome!

 

new numbers on diff dyno. update on 1st post

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by John 07 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
UPDATE
Today I went to UD motors and jumped on their Dyna V1 Dynajet and brought up this number 163/124........WTF???? Nothing is consistent.
</TD></TR></TABLE>

What do you mean nothing is consistent? You ran on a *different* dyno and a *different TYPE* of dyno at that, why are you surprised?

 

2% significance must mean a lot to him Hell, that seems plenty consistent.

 

From my previous experience, when i ran my GSR on 2 different dynos the numbers were off by 1 or 2. This was a while back. I guess compared to what my GSR ran, the numbers seem different for the R.

 

dude its fine...your numbers are dead on for stock...maybe 1-2 whp lower than most. I have 218 whp on a dynapack, but if I went on a mustang dyno I would prollyonly make like 210

 

^ I feel a lil more relaxed now...lol