All motor s2k??
So where are the all motor s2k's? I always see turbo and supercharged s2ks. Don't get me wrong, that's kick *** and for each their own, but I want to see some all motor power.
I'm talking about more displacement, higher compression, built head and maybe some ITB's. Are there any out there? What kind of power you making?
I'm talking about more displacement, higher compression, built head and maybe some ITB's. Are there any out there? What kind of power you making?
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1827629
can't make more NA power much unless you are 2.5 and you still are less than 300 hp. pointless in my opinion.
can't make more NA power much unless you are 2.5 and you still are less than 300 hp. pointless in my opinion.
Guess I didn't search enough! I'm not about blowing a motor up, but you can do that with FI too. 300whp isn't bad all motor, but I'd want to keep it a daily driver and going 2.5 isn't reliable!
I see what you mean, but I'm still partial to all motor.
Thanks for the link bro!
I see what you mean, but I'm still partial to all motor.
Thanks for the link bro!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by iam7head »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">http://www.racingfilm.com/vide...Turbo</TD></TR></TABLE>
I lost interest after about 2 mins since I had no clue what was going on! haha
I lost interest after about 2 mins since I had no clue what was going on! haha
Trending Topics
i doubt i'm qualified to answer that but i know a guy with minor head work, + usual n/a mods, around 240 hp. you can do 300-350 reliable daily with S/C i know that much.
you'd probably spend more getting half the power on an n/a setup.
realistically you can find a used s/c for about 3-4k. add 1k for emanage (not the most efficient setup) including tune, injectors, pulley, fuel pump, call it a day.
realistically you can find a used s/c for about 3-4k. add 1k for emanage (not the most efficient setup) including tune, injectors, pulley, fuel pump, call it a day.
Not sure to be honest.
Just wanted a summer cruiser to begin with. Then I thought all motor would be nice and now you have me thinking sc! (haha) A summer cruiser with some nuts would be nice. Other then that, I really don't know.
Just wanted a summer cruiser to begin with. Then I thought all motor would be nice and now you have me thinking sc! (haha) A summer cruiser with some nuts would be nice. Other then that, I really don't know.
if you want a summer cruiser, i doubt you will want this much hp. just drive one you'll see what im talking about. a little boost of power for summer= 4.57 or 4.77. just my opinion though.
70mm throttle body, spoon n1, spoon header, 4.77 gears, mugen intake, j's ecu, test pipe
expensive set up but its what i plan on doing prolly make 230 whp or a little more! this would be a reliable and fast set up.
expensive set up but its what i plan on doing prolly make 230 whp or a little more! this would be a reliable and fast set up.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by apSquidFace »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">70mm throttle body, spoon n1, spoon header, 4.77 gears, mugen intake, j's ecu, test pipe
expensive set up but its what i plan on doing prolly make 230 whp or a little more! this would be a reliable and fast set up. </TD></TR></TABLE>
reliable yes. fast, not really.
expensive set up but its what i plan on doing prolly make 230 whp or a little more! this would be a reliable and fast set up. </TD></TR></TABLE>
reliable yes. fast, not really.
Munkyw3rkz.webs.com
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 22,166
Likes: 1
From: PUTTIN UR MOUTH ON CURBZ CPT, SoCal
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
reliable yes. fast, not really. </TD></TR></TABLE>
with me driving.. FAST!
reliable yes. fast, not really. </TD></TR></TABLE>
with me driving.. FAST!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LAS2K »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
reliable yes. fast, not really. </TD></TR></TABLE>
reliable yes. fast, not really. </TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by apSquidFace »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
</TD></TR></TABLE>
as in compared to s/c, which we have been talking about, no.
</TD></TR></TABLE>as in compared to s/c, which we have been talking about, no.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WH0R3nEF9 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I lost interest after about 2 mins since I had no clue what was going on! haha</TD></TR></TABLE>
it's about the J's na machine keeping up with the turbo'ed amuse machine
I lost interest after about 2 mins since I had no clue what was going on! haha</TD></TR></TABLE>
it's about the J's na machine keeping up with the turbo'ed amuse machine
gears arent HP
NA ftw
sc is cool but doesnt feel the same or sound the same as NA
turbo is nice for lots of power and it's pretty reliable, but once again depends on what you want
i dont care about 350whp
id rather have a 250whp NA car.
imo, the s2k with much more than 250whp is way too hard to control on the track unless you have serious rubber(grip) and lots of weight reduction
matt
NA ftw
sc is cool but doesnt feel the same or sound the same as NA
turbo is nice for lots of power and it's pretty reliable, but once again depends on what you want
i dont care about 350whp
id rather have a 250whp NA car.
imo, the s2k with much more than 250whp is way too hard to control on the track unless you have serious rubber(grip) and lots of weight reduction
matt
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Azcheron »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">gears arent HP
NA ftw
sc is cool but doesnt feel the same or sound the same as NA
turbo is nice for lots of power and it's pretty reliable, but once again depends on what you want
i dont care about 350whp
id rather have a 250whp NA car.
imo, the s2k with much more than 250whp is way too hard to control on the track unless you have serious rubber(grip) and lots of weight reduction
matt</TD></TR></TABLE>
I've never been in a supercharged honda before, so I don't really know what kind of power it makes. 250whp is good...in a hatch or crx all motor, but that power in an s2k with it weight difference isn't all that great. From what I've read and heard, all motor is pretty expensive and for the same or less money you could have 100 more hp.
Although I still love the idea of an all motor s2k, LAS2K has me thinking alot about sc now.
NA ftw
sc is cool but doesnt feel the same or sound the same as NA
turbo is nice for lots of power and it's pretty reliable, but once again depends on what you want
i dont care about 350whp
id rather have a 250whp NA car.
imo, the s2k with much more than 250whp is way too hard to control on the track unless you have serious rubber(grip) and lots of weight reduction
matt</TD></TR></TABLE>
I've never been in a supercharged honda before, so I don't really know what kind of power it makes. 250whp is good...in a hatch or crx all motor, but that power in an s2k with it weight difference isn't all that great. From what I've read and heard, all motor is pretty expensive and for the same or less money you could have 100 more hp.
Although I still love the idea of an all motor s2k, LAS2K has me thinking alot about sc now.


