ball-bearing version of straight t3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
SpeedwaySlick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Speedway, IN
Default ball-bearing version of straight t3?

Well I saw a considerable amount of oil in my IC piping after just a few hundred miles of boost. I bought the turbo used. I don't know for sure whether its a t3/t04 or straight t3, but I think its a t3. I like the quick spool. I need to find a place soon that can rebuild and rebalance it. But I've had it in mind for a while to get a ball-bearing turbo. If I do, I just want to make sure I get one that has the same dimensions so I don't have to change my manifold or downpipe. What are some part numbers I should be looking for for a ball-bearing version of my turbo?

It says Garrett AiResearch on the turbine housing. Here's a pic

Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 06:53 PM
  #2  
B18C1CYA's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,751
Likes: 1
From: Ny,NY
Default Re: ball-bearing version of straight t3? (SpeedwaySlick)

looks to be your normal T3 , with 5 bolt discharge
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 07:25 PM
  #3  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: ball-bearing version of straight t3? (SpeedwaySlick)

Probably a typical 50 trim T3. Take the compressor cover off to acurately measure the small end of the comp. wheel, then refer to this site: http://majesticturbo.com/c-maps-1.html

The difference between a 45 trim and 60 trim T3 inducer size is 3/8", and power diff is enough for 100+/- whp on a honda (based on lb/min flow).
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 07:31 PM
  #4  
Fo-Do Fanatic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,420
Likes: 1
From: Lovin the EF, Wa
Default Re: ball-bearing version of straight t3? (HiProfile)

fvck i hate 5 bolt turbos.

Reply
Old Jan 10, 2007 | 11:27 PM
  #5  
HiProfile's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,015
Likes: 7
From: b00sting my D16s, SoWis, USA
Default Re: ball-bearing version of straight t3? (b00sted-Hatch)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b00sted-Hatch &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">fvck i hate 5 bolt turbos.

</TD></TR></TABLE>


Because they're more versitle? Because you're limited to a 2.5 to 3"/4" flare right off the flange for a turbo that has 2.439" exducer (stg5) at the most? Because you can't mix in some thought to make the wg port work w/o boost creap? A crappy 40mm design can have much more creap than a well-designed internal setup.
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 12:05 AM
  #6  
Fo-Do Fanatic's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,420
Likes: 1
From: Lovin the EF, Wa
Default Re: ball-bearing version of straight t3? (HiProfile)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HiProfile &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


Because they're more versitle? Because you're limited to a 2.5 to 3"/4" flare right off the flange for a turbo that has 2.439" exducer (stg5) at the most? Because you can't mix in some thought to make the wg port work w/o boost creap? A crappy 40mm design can have much more creap than a well-designed internal setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>

hahah, not for that reason lol.

i just having having to take off that ******* dreaded 5th bolt

i wasn't literally meaning "hate"
Reply
Old Jan 11, 2007 | 03:48 AM
  #7  
SpeedwaySlick's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: Speedway, IN
Default Re: ball-bearing version of straight t3? (HiProfile)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HiProfile &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


A crappy 40mm design can have much more creap than a well-designed internal setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>

That part is blocked off by the flange. I am running an external wg.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sikid111
Forced Induction
4
Sep 20, 2010 10:16 AM
rdeezy78
Forced Induction
8
Feb 9, 2009 06:02 PM
acuracy r
Forced Induction
11
Feb 21, 2005 10:36 PM
1.8T_EG
Forced Induction
12
Oct 30, 2002 09:50 AM
Dorikamu
Forced Induction
7
May 3, 2002 07:17 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:22 PM.