LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 448
Likes: 0
From: WA
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (PrinceAli132)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PrinceAli132 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No noticable difference IMO.
Ali</TD></TR></TABLE>
Ali</TD></TR></TABLE>
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,215
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl, USA
Re: (TOO MUCH TORQUE)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TOO MUCH TORQUE »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">anymore experience</TD></TR></TABLE>
Honestly, even if there was a slight difference (which there isn't) it makes no difference. Do you plan on keeping the car stock?
If not then you'll probably at some point want to upgrade your suspension components, therefore yielding a great handling car when done right.
Ali
Honestly, even if there was a slight difference (which there isn't) it makes no difference. Do you plan on keeping the car stock?
If not then you'll probably at some point want to upgrade your suspension components, therefore yielding a great handling car when done right.
Ali
They let me pick
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (TOO MUCH TORQUE)
If the ls doesn't have a sunroof, technically it should handle slightly (but not noticeably) different on account of a lower COG, but for your purposes they are equivalent.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 0
From: JDM land, usa
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (mrdeadman)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mrdeadman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If the ls doesn't have a sunroof, technically it should handle slightly (but not noticeably) different on account of a lower COG, but for your purposes they are equivalent. </TD></TR></TABLE>
by definition all ls models came with a sunroof...rs's didnt so it would be an rs
by definition all ls models came with a sunroof...rs's didnt so it would be an rs
They let me pick
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (boots)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boots »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
by definition all ls models came with a sunroof...rs's didnt so it would be an rs</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought it was optional on the LS, standard on the GS... but whatever.
by definition all ls models came with a sunroof...rs's didnt so it would be an rs</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought it was optional on the LS, standard on the GS... but whatever.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,337
Likes: 0
From: JDM land, usa
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (mrdeadman)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mrdeadman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I thought it was optional on the LS, standard on the GS... but whatever.</TD></TR></TABLE>
its the other way around...but i was just busting your *****
its the other way around...but i was just busting your *****
They let me pick
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (boots)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by boots »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
its the other way around...but i was just busting your ***** </TD></TR></TABLE>
I call BS it's not the other way around, take the cards. GS is the upper model right before the GSR.
its the other way around...but i was just busting your *****
</TD></TR></TABLE>I call BS it's not the other way around, take the cards.
GS is the upper model right before the GSR.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (imadickted2yu)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by imadickted2yu »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what about ls and itr. are there any differences?</TD></TR></TABLE>
yes, there is a really big difference in handling between the itr and all other intergras.
yes, there is a really big difference in handling between the itr and all other intergras.
76.169.175.137
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
From: So Cal....yes, i know, ca, USA
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (-Darren-)
sway bar is different, pretty much the whole suspension is upgraded, bigger rotors and brake calipers...and the JDM 98 spec ITR is even better 
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,327
Likes: 0
From: NASSUA, LI, NY, U.S.A.
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (CW_98gsr)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by CW_98gsr »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">sway bar is different, pretty much the whole suspension is upgraded, bigger rotors and brake calipers...and the JDM 98 spec ITR is even better </TD></TR></TABLE>
thats not true. ur thinking of the type r. the gsr only has a front strut tower bar compared to an LS. all the suspension components are the same. rotors calipers springs struts etc are all the same
</TD></TR></TABLE>thats not true. ur thinking of the type r. the gsr only has a front strut tower bar compared to an LS. all the suspension components are the same. rotors calipers springs struts etc are all the same
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,215
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl, USA
76.169.175.137
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,659
Likes: 0
From: So Cal....yes, i know, ca, USA
Re: LS HANDLING COMPARED TO GSR (gsr dood)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gsr dood »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
thats not true. ur thinking of the type r. the gsr only has a front strut tower bar compared to an LS. all the suspension components are the same. rotors calipers springs struts etc are all the same </TD></TR></TABLE>
forgot to quote the comment above me
thats not true. ur thinking of the type r. the gsr only has a front strut tower bar compared to an LS. all the suspension components are the same. rotors calipers springs struts etc are all the same
</TD></TR></TABLE>forgot to quote the comment above me
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 480
Likes: 0
From: Nevada
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mrdeadman »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> I call BS it's not the other way around, take the cards. GS is the upper model right before the GSR. </TD></TR></TABLE>
I own a 91' GS four door with no a/c, sunroof, or power locks and it came that way from the factory. My buddy also owns a 90' GS hatch back with no power locks or a/c stock.
I own a 91' GS four door with no a/c, sunroof, or power locks and it came that way from the factory. My buddy also owns a 90' GS hatch back with no power locks or a/c stock.
They let me pick
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,690
Likes: 1
Re: (GsDAteg)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GsDAteg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I own a 91' GS four door with no a/c, sunroof, or power locks and it came that way from the factory. My buddy also owns a 90' GS hatch back with no power locks or a/c stock. </TD></TR></TABLE>
We are referring to the 94-01 models when the GS came stock with all the options.
I own a 91' GS four door with no a/c, sunroof, or power locks and it came that way from the factory. My buddy also owns a 90' GS hatch back with no power locks or a/c stock. </TD></TR></TABLE>
We are referring to the 94-01 models when the GS came stock with all the options.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,775
Likes: 0
From: Danbury, CT, 06804
only way there might be a slight difference would be comparing an rs to a gsr, only because of the weight difference. four door should actually handle a little better if skunk 2 is correct when saying that the four door is more rigid. i never noticed any difference in handling between any tegs i've driven, besides ones with aftermarket or messed up suspension.