Quick post after a couple dyno runs today.

Completely stock F23A4 (Cali U-LEV V-TEC) on DynoJet Dynameter.

 

good power

 

afaccord, what are you doing with the f23a4 if you don't mind me asking?

 

Once it comes out of the car, it's probably gonna sit in my basement just incase the FI setup takes a crap.

 

wtf? 300hp is good in my book.. 400hp is great, 500hp is excellent ... the jaw dropping power starts at 600hp..

dude, add some beef to your 'cord.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NJ VTECpowered &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">good power</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ny153 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wtf? 300hp is good in my book.. 400hp is great, 500hp is excellent ... the jaw dropping power starts at 600hp..

dude, add some beef to your 'cord. </TD></TR></TABLE>


I don't care what you think 'good power' is. Matter of fact, I could care less about hp all together. This is a STOCK, BASELINE dyno run.

To the point,
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AFAccord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Completely stock F23A4 (Cali U-LEV V-TEC) on DynoJet Dynameter.</TD></TR></TABLE>

This is simply a baseline run for new 6th gen Accord owners who are interested to see what their Accord's stock powerplant might produce. 138wtq stock. How many other stock everyday Honda four-bangers that can do this, and at ~2500 rpms no less.

Read up on notoriousB if you want modified power.


Modified by AFAccord at 12:14 AM 1/18/2007


Modified by AFAccord at 8:07 AM 9/26/2008

 

thanks. thats actually very helpful.

i hope my F22B1 with I/H/E isnt to far off those numbers.

 

wow 123HP

 

well what else would you expect buddy.

 

I WOULDN'T expect someone to post a dyno on a stock 4 banger accord. Whats the point? No one buys these cars to make em a race car. Buddy...

 

You're missing the point. This is simply a baseline run... meaning, if AFAccord gets a dyno later on after completing his FI setup, he'll have something to compare it to. That way he'll know what his actual gains were.

For other owners, it gives them an idea of what they are starting off with. There's always people asking what a stock motor puts down, whether in someone else's thread or in their own. That's the point...

There are plenty of people who are going for fairly high horsepower numbers, even 6th gen owners. You don't have to have a race car to have higher horsepower goals.

 

Oh well his post was pretty veg(sp). I didn't know this guy was going to do mods or anything substansial.

 

[QUOTE=AFAccord]


I couldn't give two ***** what you think 'good power' is. Matter of fact, I could care less about hp all together. What good is 600hp with 210ft/lb torque? Show me 300+ ft/lb tq and I'll consider the car praise worthy. But I digress...

How about this then?



My work truck!

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SneezinCD5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">[How about this then? </TD></TR></TABLE>


Lol. Yeah, that's impressive alright, but on a whole nother level. I've got a soft spot in my heart for diesels. My girlfriend drives an '05 Ram 2500 4x4 with the Cummins turbo diesel, fully loaded with the complete Banks Performance Six Gun kit (I had nothing to do with it ). It pulls a meager 502whp and 917ft/lb wtq on the same dyno.

 

Nice numbers stock man, especially the torque. I just got mine dynoed too..156.9whp and 145wtq with i/h/e, stage 1 clutch/fidanza flywheel, and a catalytic emissions CEL

My torque didn't increase much from the mods considering yours stock is 137. I have the F23a4 ULEV too

Btw..Thank you for posting a stock 6th gen dyno. I'm sure a lot of people over on 6thgenaccord.com will be happy with this. I am a believer in the F23 too

 

Well done, sir.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98AV6205HP &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow 123HP </TD></TR></TABLE>
Considering the car's SAE Net rating, it is pretty good indeed.

 

Thanks for all the input. Just hoping this would prove useful for others. I've always been interested in seeing stock results.

 

for you guys with higher mileage F22B1's sometime this week, i am getting my 2.2CL dynoed. i have I/H/E/ and no cat, w/ 125K. only $50 bucks for 3 runs. doesnt sound to bad for me.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 98AV6205HP &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">wow 123HP </TD></TR></TABLE>

Wow, you have a v6.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NJ JDM CL &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">for you guys with higher mileage F22B1's sometime this week, i am getting my 2.2CL dynoed. i have I/H/E/ and no cat, w/ 125K. only $50 bucks for 3 runs. doesnt sound to bad for me.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Although I doubt this car will ever be campaigned again, it won the last two races it was in. We've lost track of the total mileage on the motor, but it's up around 300,000 miles and we've never even taken the head off.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlkChryKord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Wow, you have a v6. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Which is in NO way advantageous over any four cyl 5mt accord. He's gonna see lower results vs his net ratings, and while they may be higher than a stock four cyl engine, he's still at a gearing, and weight disadvantage. I really don't understand why he even raised question on this thread.

 

jesus christ!!!!

did i just say i had a high mileage F22B1. i take that back. lol

how is that possible that at least the head didnt blow up!!!!

 

I had an F22B1 with 328K+ on it, ran it hard, and I still see the new owner driving it around occasionally.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by NJ JDM CL &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">jesus christ!!!!

did i just say i had a high mileage F22B1. i take that back. lol

how is that possible that at least the head didnt blow up!!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

In my point of view.... a domestic car with 70k miles is high mileaged already.
Now, when it comes to a honda or acura..... 180k or 200k is when you could say.... "...oh well.. it's got a high mileage on the odometer..."... and yet.. drives and feels as reliable as when it had 100k.
I had one accord (91 SE auto), that had 250k miles on it... drove strong, I had it for delivery of pizza and food at restaurant 7 days of the week. It never gave me the idea that the engine needed some rest.

That's one of the things that make me like a honda so much.
And this thread, is indeed helpful to the accord owners out there, that should belive more in HP gain in their original motors other than swaping motors from japan. I'm not saying is wrong to swap, I'm just saying that with the same money to swap a motor, you could invest in that f22 or f23 and make it descently responsive to the gas pedal.

Accord luv!!!!