All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

b16 IM vs ITR IM

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 05:52 PM
  #1  
Drew17th's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wa, USA
Default b16 IM vs ITR IM

what is the difference??? ITR flows better right?????
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 06:09 PM
  #2  
Brick Top's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,654
Likes: 1
From: cincinnati
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (Drew17th)

with stock cams, the myth is the b16 p30 manifold over powers the itr manifold throughout the entire rpm range. not sure if different bottom ends affect this.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 06:18 PM
  #3  
Drew17th's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wa, USA
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (brick top)

well im gonna have jdm itr bottom end completely rebuilt with fully built supertech head with high compression valves with m22x cams....
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2006 | 07:15 PM
  #4  
Del Soouulll's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (Drew17th)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Drew17th &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well im gonna have jdm itr bottom end completely rebuilt with fully built supertech head with high compression valves with m22x cams....</TD></TR></TABLE>

ITR manifold ported, or Skunk2 Pro series would be good
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 01:18 PM
  #5  
gotboost562's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (bLack*)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bLack* &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

ITR manifold ported, or Skunk2 Pro series would be good</TD></TR></TABLE>

Whom do you suggest doing the port job? Import Builders? Is there a difference in the JDM and USDM ITR manifolds? Thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 01:29 PM
  #6  
jdmB18CT-R's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
From: Northern, 671, U.S.
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (gotboost562)

Dont forget whitfield racing CNC P73 manifolds..
And just because you got a bigger/better manifold dont forget the TB, like MAXBORE porting..
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #7  
gotboost562's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (jdmB18CT-R)

What about the Edelbrock Victor X?
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 04:59 PM
  #8  
Del Soouulll's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (gotboost562)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by gotboost562 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">What about the Edelbrock Victor X?</TD></TR></TABLE>

i suggest this manifold for a 2L motor
Reply
Old Dec 15, 2006 | 10:53 PM
  #9  
UncleD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,465
Likes: 4
From: GO PACKERS
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (bLack*)

With the M22x cam, you're gonna want an intake that flows well on the top end. In your personaly situation, go with the type r. And the Victor X should be out of the question, MUCH too large for your motor as it is now.:

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by bLack* &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i suggest this manifold for a 2L motor</TD></TR></TABLE>
Reply
Old Dec 16, 2006 | 02:30 PM
  #10  
Drew17th's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wa, USA
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (clean rice)

so for my personnal set up go with the type r manifold???? good cuz i just bought it for $40 from a friend lol... thats what i call deals.....
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 09:25 PM
  #11  
Drew17th's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Everett, Wa, USA
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (Drew17th)

bump!
Reply
Old Dec 18, 2006 | 10:08 PM
  #12  
UncleD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 8,465
Likes: 4
From: GO PACKERS
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (Drew17th)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Drew17th &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so for my personnal set up go with the type r manifold???? </TD></TR></TABLE>

For sure, you got a DEAL son!
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2006 | 07:13 AM
  #13  
SkankyEJ7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,919
Likes: 0
From: Auburn, AL, usa
Default Re: b16 IM vs ITR IM (clean rice)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by clean rice &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">With the M22x cam, you're gonna want an intake that flows well on the top end. In your personaly situation, go with the type r. And the Victor X should be out of the question, MUCH too large for your motor as it is now.:

</TD></TR></TABLE>


Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4doortypeR
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
14
Mar 26, 2010 03:35 PM
Turboed00EM1
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
3
Nov 19, 2007 11:31 AM
mike_paz17
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
2
May 23, 2007 07:37 PM
-KangaRod-
Hybrid / Engine Swaps
3
Oct 2, 2003 01:13 PM
preludacris
Tech / Misc
8
Apr 24, 2003 05:15 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:10 PM.