im currently runnin pennzoil synchromesh in m car. i have been for around 15K miles. before i put the pennzoil in i had slight notchiness with my gears, after the pennzoil it was gone. im about ready to change the tranny fluid again, and im wondering if i should maybe go with the honda mtf. i put that in my brothers teg and it was like a nite and day difference compared to watever was in there before. the only thing im worried about is if i switch to the honda mtf my notchiness will come back. any thoughts on the synchromesh vs the honda mtf?

 

I say stick with the synchromesh, its good ****.

 

yeah, i put in the ac delco syncromesh and it was nice after.... depends though.. some people's tranny responds differently.

 

If you have grinds, get FRICTION MODIFIED gm syncromesh. If you dont, run normal HMTF.

 

stick with the syncromesh

 

nah theres no grinds, its just gettin kinda notchy in its old age. theres 119K on the tranny

 

GM synchromesh > any synchromesh fluid.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dc2rtek &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">GM synchromesh &gt; any synchromesh fluid.</TD></TR></TABLE>

reason being?

 

Correct me if I'm wrong but, GM Syncromesh has higher density then Honda MTF and yes, it will help with the grinds but in the long run you can create more damage to the tranmission then what it was before. The syncromesh is just a to hide the problem, not solve it. Anybody agree or no?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by danteisme &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">reason being?</TD></TR></TABLE>

because my car had nasty 3rd gear grind that you could hear 5 miles away and the GM synchromesh stopped my grind in 2 weeks and made my gears go in real smooth. I can put my car in reverse with my pinky.