which do you think is a better budget option.. budget meaning as cheap as possible
i dont want to have to deal with bending clutch pedals and what not from the hasport kit. plus i dont want to fork over that much extra if i can get the same results from the b18a. basically when all is said and done with the motor, i want to be boosted to 350+ WHP.

but that is down the road.

or would it be better to go with a b18c and use the cable tranny?

 

i would go with a b16a cable tranny shorter gears faster accle. plus why spend the extra money on a cable to hydro conversation, just use a 90-93 integra clutch cable with a spacer.

 

it poll was for a b18, not a b16. and here is another ? for you. can i use any b series motor with a cable tranny? cause if so, then i will go with a b18c and cable tranny

 

yea u can use any b series motor wit a cable tranny they all interchange

 

Cheaper is a no-brainer here. The cable tranny will be a much cheaper option for you, maybe about $400 give or take. The hydro tranny will cost you about $600 or so just for the tranny and about $400 for the mount kit.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Themadone &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea u can use any b series motor wit a cable tranny they all interchange </TD></TR></TABLE>

You will want a better tranny then the ls if you really will be making high HP #s a GSR might suit you better.

 

i decided that i will go with a b16 from h-motors. just cheaper for everything in the long run, and i figure with building the bottom end and a stage 3 turbo, i should get what i want out of it.

 

Can't beat the YS1 with the 4.4 FD. Much shorter than a 94-01 GS-R tranny, I drive both on a daily basis and it's a big difference. Only thing better would be a Type-R tranny, and that's expensive.