peakboost ramhorn mani's any good?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #1  
integracivic94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: essex, england
Default peakboost ramhorn mani's any good?

thinking of buying a peakboost ramhorn mani for my b18c4! hoping to hit around 450whp just wanted to know will this manifold reach that power goal and will it give a fast spool? have been searching but i have yet to find the answers im after! thanks for looking regards russell
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 09:46 AM
  #2  
BoostedEG6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
From: Mechanicsville VA
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (integracivic94)

yes, peakboost is good
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #3  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

Their manifolds are some of the best on the market....talk to Anthony at PeakBoost and he will hook you up and you will make your power goal
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #4  
nebulight's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: PA, United States
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (BoostedEG6)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BoostedEG6 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, peakboost is good </TD></TR></TABLE>

Plus Anthony is the man, he went out of his way to make a bad situation right! He gets
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #5  
integracivic94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: essex, england
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (nebulight)

glad about the good comments
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 11:46 AM
  #6  
DRAGWORKS's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
From: PA, USA
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (integracivic94)

i just made 345whp/230tq with the peak boost turbo kit on a stock block b16a!!peak boost gets a from me
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #7  
HT Chaplain's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,343
Likes: 4
From: u.s.
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (DRAGWORKS)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DRAGWORKS &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i just made 345whp/230tq with the peak boost turbo kit on a stock block b16a!!peak boost gets a from me
</TD></TR></TABLE>

how much boost?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 12:28 PM
  #8  
nebulight's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: PA, United States
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (HT Chaplain)

10-11psi

http://forums.evans-tuning.com...=3797

Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 03:49 PM
  #9  
DfwBB6's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,668
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX, U.S.A
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (integracivic94)

peakboost
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2006 | 04:13 PM
  #10  
sc4dr's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,153
Likes: 0
From: Bmore, usa
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (Lude_Nation)

I havent dyno'd mine yet, but craftmanship is excellent
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 08:25 AM
  #11  
integracivic94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: essex, england
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (sc4dr)

anyone had any fitment issues with these? im looking to hit 450whp+ so i will using a fairly nice sized turbo dont really wanna shave the block if i can help it! thanks for looking!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:10 AM
  #12  
TURBOFTW's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
From: az
Default Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (integracivic94)

Thanks for all the kind words guys....

You will not have a fitment issue with our ver.1, ftw or topmount....

Heres a pic of our ver.1.



FTW Ramhorn



Topmount(not the best pic)


Any questions just pm me
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2006 | 09:14 AM
  #13  
Schister66's Avatar
Man U FTW
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 11,973
Likes: 2
From: Phoenix, AZ
Default

nice stuff....its what i'm using on my next build
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 06:19 AM
  #14  
integracivic94's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: essex, england
Default Re: (Schister66)

all looks good roll on payday
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 06:27 AM
  #15  
redboost10's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Default Re: (integracivic94)

just curious, have you had better results with the ver. 1 compared to the ftw ramhorn? i like how the ver. 1 has more of a "straight" when exiting the head.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 12:36 PM
  #16  
PeakBoost's Avatar
B*A*N*N*E*D
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 0
Default Re: (tgh99si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tgh99si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just curious, have you had better results with the ver. 1 compared to the ftw ramhorn? i like how the ver. 1 has more of a "straight" when exiting the head. </TD></TR></TABLE>

good question, that i've been asking myself for sometime now.

to be honest, we've yet to test them back to back.

however, i completely agree with you. the 90* bend of the "FTW Ramhorn" coming out of the #1 and #4 cyl, seems to be much more restrictive than the 45* of the PeakBoost Ver.1.
beyond this, the "FTW" #2 and #3 runners are quite a bit longer and have a much higher volume than the 1 and 4. whereas the PeakBoost Ver1 runners are all within ~1inch of equal.

all in all, both manifolds have been proven to put down awesome power, look great and stand the test of time. in the past 5years we've made well over 2000 manifolds and have only had 4 warranty claims(in the first year of production). pretty good track record if i do say so myself.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2006 | 01:00 PM
  #17  
redboost10's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Ken Peak)

the ver. 1 i have not seen any other company fabricate besides you guys, i prefer the design because it looks like it is also a lot further more away from the valve cover than the FTW, which can only be good for oil temps on the valve train;

but nonetheless, both designs make power.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdmrex90si
Forced Induction
61
Aug 12, 2008 04:56 PM
mrdeadman
Acura Integra
6
Jan 10, 2007 07:26 PM
RsxType-Stitch
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
16
Sep 7, 2005 07:52 PM
Bradstard
Acura Integra Type-R
65
Dec 19, 2004 10:01 PM
sinister1
Drag Racing
98
Aug 28, 2004 08:39 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:52 PM.