peakboost ramhorn mani's any good?
08-15-2006, 09:44 AM
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: essex, england
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
peakboost ramhorn mani's any good?
thinking of buying a peakboost ramhorn mani for my b18c4! hoping to hit around 450whp just wanted to know will this manifold reach that power goal and will it give a fast spool? have been searching but i have yet to find the answers im after! thanks for looking regards russell
08-15-2006, 10:22 AM
#4
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA, United States
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (BoostedEG6)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BoostedEG6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, peakboost is good 
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Plus Anthony is the man, he went out of his way to make a bad situation right! He gets
</TD></TR></TABLE> Plus Anthony is the man, he went out of his way to make a bad situation right! He gets
08-16-2006, 12:05 PM
#7
Honda-Tech Member
Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (DRAGWORKS)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DRAGWORKS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i just made 345whp/230tq with the peak boost turbo kit on a stock block b16a!!peak boost gets a from me
</TD></TR></TABLE>
how much boost?
from me</TD></TR></TABLE>
how much boost?
Trending Topics
08-16-2006, 12:28 PM
#8
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: PA, United States
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (HT Chaplain)
08-17-2006, 08:25 AM
#11
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: essex, england
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (sc4dr)
anyone had any fitment issues with these? im looking to hit 450whp+ so i will using a fairly nice sized turbo dont really wanna shave the block if i can help it! thanks for looking!
08-17-2006, 09:10 AM
#12
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: az
Posts: 1,766
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: peakboost ramhorn mani's any good? (integracivic94)
Thanks for all the kind words guys....
You will not have a fitment issue with our ver.1, ftw or topmount....
Heres a pic of our ver.1.
FTW Ramhorn
Topmount(not the best pic)
Any questions just pm me
You will not have a fitment issue with our ver.1, ftw or topmount....
Heres a pic of our ver.1.
FTW Ramhorn
Topmount(not the best pic)
Any questions just pm me
08-18-2006, 06:27 AM
#15
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (integracivic94)
just curious, have you had better results with the ver. 1 compared to the ftw ramhorn? i like how the ver. 1 has more of a "straight" when exiting the head.
08-18-2006, 12:36 PM
#16
B*A*N*N*E*D
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,661
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (tgh99si)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tgh99si »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">just curious, have you had better results with the ver. 1 compared to the ftw ramhorn? i like how the ver. 1 has more of a "straight" when exiting the head. </TD></TR></TABLE>
good question, that i've been asking myself for sometime now.
to be honest, we've yet to test them back to back.
however, i completely agree with you. the 90* bend of the "FTW Ramhorn" coming out of the #1 and #4 cyl, seems to be much more restrictive than the 45* of the PeakBoost Ver.1.
beyond this, the "FTW" #2 and #3 runners are quite a bit longer and have a much higher volume than the 1 and 4. whereas the PeakBoost Ver1 runners are all within ~1inch of equal.
all in all, both manifolds have been proven to put down awesome power, look great and stand the test of time. in the past 5years we've made well over 2000 manifolds and have only had 4 warranty claims(in the first year of production). pretty good track record if i do say so myself.
good question, that i've been asking myself for sometime now.
to be honest, we've yet to test them back to back.
however, i completely agree with you. the 90* bend of the "FTW Ramhorn" coming out of the #1 and #4 cyl, seems to be much more restrictive than the 45* of the PeakBoost Ver.1.
beyond this, the "FTW" #2 and #3 runners are quite a bit longer and have a much higher volume than the 1 and 4. whereas the PeakBoost Ver1 runners are all within ~1inch of equal.
all in all, both manifolds have been proven to put down awesome power, look great and stand the test of time. in the past 5years we've made well over 2000 manifolds and have only had 4 warranty claims(in the first year of production). pretty good track record if i do say so myself.
08-18-2006, 01:00 PM
#17
Honda-Tech Member
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,056
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: (Ken Peak)
the ver. 1 i have not seen any other company fabricate besides you guys, i prefer the design because it looks like it is also a lot further more away from the valve cover than the FTW, which can only be good for oil temps on the valve train;
but nonetheless, both designs make power.
but nonetheless, both designs make power.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RsxType-Stitch
Acura RSX DC5 & Honda Civic EP3
16
09-07-2005 07:52 PM
