Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000) EG/EH/EJ/EK/EM1 Discussion

Turbo vs. NA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 12:54 AM
  #1  
LS_92_HB_TX's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
From: North Richland Hills, Texas, USA
Default Turbo vs. NA

I have a 92hatch with an LS swap.....im stucj between a rock and a hard place with money to spend.....i wanna know if it would be better to build it up and boost it or still build it up and go NA
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 12:57 AM
  #2  
john666's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,271
Likes: 0
From: westminster, ca
Default Re: Turbo vs. NA (LS_92_HB_TX)

everyones different.. i think fun factor could build the ls and smack a turbo on.. really depends on your long term goals and funds
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 12:58 AM
  #3  
HonDelso's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, Hawaii, USA
Default

I say turbo or Nos, best bang for your buck.

but i'd give more props to the guy who goes N/A
Reply
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 06:57 AM
  #4  
Pocket_Rocket's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: barrie, ont, canada
Default

bottles are for babies, real men get blown! an N/A engine will be much more expensive to build as apposed to a trubo engine. (That is of course if you looking at for example, a total of 220 hp and the end of each build).
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nine3Sol
Forced Induction
40
Feb 14, 2019 02:57 AM
Murk 'EM
Acura Integra
1
Mar 10, 2011 03:03 PM
TVietEBoyG
Acura Integra
4
Aug 14, 2007 04:30 AM
00IntegrAllmotoR
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
Aug 11, 2004 03:25 AM
bakinbits
Acura Integra
5
Feb 13, 2002 12:09 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:24 PM.