H1 rule question
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 0
From: Northern, CA, USA
H1 rule question
Can you run a adjustable link on your car such as this one to adjust toe if you are also running a camber kit in the rear. I ask because I thought from reading the rules you were only allowed to run one adjustable suspension arm per corner of the car.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 1
From: Roanoke A.K.A. Redneckville,VA
Re: H1 rule question (chad)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chad »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">1 camber adjusting device per corner....so that part would be illegal if you had something else
</TD></TR></TABLE>
but,it's not a camber adjusting device
i'm assuming this replaces the toe link at the front of the trailing arm?
chris
</TD></TR></TABLE>
but,it's not a camber adjusting device
i'm assuming this replaces the toe link at the front of the trailing arm?
chris
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,045
Likes: 0
From: Dementia
Re: H1 rule question (TeamNextGenChris)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TeamNextGenChris »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
but,it's not a camber adjusting device
i'm assuming this replaces the toe link at the front of the trailing arm?
chris</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yup it bolts in place of the factory link.
but,it's not a camber adjusting device
i'm assuming this replaces the toe link at the front of the trailing arm?
chris</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yup it bolts in place of the factory link.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 4,012
Likes: 1
From: Roanoke A.K.A. Redneckville,VA
Re: H1 rule question (triple_s1x)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by triple_s1x »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yup it bolts in place of the factory link.</TD></TR></TABLE>
that's what i thought.
is the toe setting you need outside the factory link's range of adjustment?if so,sounds like you have something bent.is it like this on both sides?if not,something's bent,or your thrust angle is off.
or,do you want it to get rid of the factory rubber joints?
Chris
Yup it bolts in place of the factory link.</TD></TR></TABLE>
that's what i thought.
is the toe setting you need outside the factory link's range of adjustment?if so,sounds like you have something bent.is it like this on both sides?if not,something's bent,or your thrust angle is off.
or,do you want it to get rid of the factory rubber joints?
Chris
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
From: cali
Re: H1 rule question (TeamNextGenChris)
i haven't seen a rules update yet, and at last disscussion these were deemed illegal.
should be a re-write of the rules to deem them leagal
but as of now they are illegal.
should be a re-write of the rules to deem them leagal
but as of now they are illegal.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 0
From: Between Willow, and Button Willow, CA, USA
Re: H1 rule question (slammed_93_hatch)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by slammed_93_hatch »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
should be a re-write of the rules to deem them leagal
but as of now they are illegal.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct! They will be legal. They provide NO performance advantage. They only make adjusting toe a little easier.
should be a re-write of the rules to deem them leagal
but as of now they are illegal.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Correct! They will be legal. They provide NO performance advantage. They only make adjusting toe a little easier.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 0
From: Southern NJ, USA
Re: H1 rule question (prkiller)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by prkiller »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Correct! They will be legal. They provide NO performance advantage. They only make adjusting toe a little easier.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont know about that 100%. I was under the impression that the compiance of the rubber bushings in the toe arm, made the suspension dynamicly toe in under most loads besides braking. Seems like an advantage to me if what I heard about how the suspension works is tru.
Correct! They will be legal. They provide NO performance advantage. They only make adjusting toe a little easier.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont know about that 100%. I was under the impression that the compiance of the rubber bushings in the toe arm, made the suspension dynamicly toe in under most loads besides braking. Seems like an advantage to me if what I heard about how the suspension works is tru.
Thread Starter
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,637
Likes: 0
From: Northern, CA, USA
Re: H1 rule question (prkiller)
I was reading a old thread about them and was just curious if they were legal.
I agree the only benefit I see to them is making adjusting toe easier.
I agree the only benefit I see to them is making adjusting toe easier.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 4,596
Likes: 0
From: Between Willow, and Button Willow, CA, USA
Re: H1 rule question (xerox445)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xerox445 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I dont know about that 100%. I was under the impression that the compiance of the rubber bushings in the toe arm, made the suspension dynamicly toe in under most loads besides braking. Seems like an advantage to me if what I heard about how the suspension works is tru. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep, you might be right. But 99% of people wont be able to tell one bit of difference. They are not expensive, and I don't see them becoming a "must have" part to win, so it's kind of a pointless debate!
I dont know about that 100%. I was under the impression that the compiance of the rubber bushings in the toe arm, made the suspension dynamicly toe in under most loads besides braking. Seems like an advantage to me if what I heard about how the suspension works is tru.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Yep, you might be right. But 99% of people wont be able to tell one bit of difference. They are not expensive, and I don't see them becoming a "must have" part to win, so it's kind of a pointless debate!
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 2,369
Likes: 0
From: Southern NJ, USA
Re: H1 rule question (prkiller)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by prkiller »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Yep, you might be right. But 99% of people wont be able to tell one bit of difference. They are not expensive, and I don't see them becoming a "must have" part to win, so it's kind of a pointless debate!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yep, you might be right. But 99% of people wont be able to tell one bit of difference. They are not expensive, and I don't see them becoming a "must have" part to win, so it's kind of a pointless debate!</TD></TR></TABLE>
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 13,483
Likes: 0
From: cali
Re: H1 rule question (xerox445)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xerox445 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I dont know about that 100%. I was under the impression that the compiance of the rubber bushings in the toe arm, made the suspension dynamicly toe in under most loads besides braking. Seems like an advantage to me if what I heard about how the suspension works is tru. </TD></TR></TABLE>
you can press spherical bearings in the stock arm, which illiminates the possibility of this happening.
I dont know about that 100%. I was under the impression that the compiance of the rubber bushings in the toe arm, made the suspension dynamicly toe in under most loads besides braking. Seems like an advantage to me if what I heard about how the suspension works is tru.
</TD></TR></TABLE>you can press spherical bearings in the stock arm, which illiminates the possibility of this happening.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,805
Likes: 1
From: building H2 cars, NY
Re: H1 rule question (TeamNextGenChris)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TeamNextGenChris »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
that's what i thought.
is the toe setting you need outside the factory link's range of adjustment?if so,sounds like you have something bent.is it like this on both sides?if not,something's bent,or your thrust angle is off.
or,do you want it to get rid of the factory rubber joints?
Chris</TD></TR></TABLE>
there good to have if you have an older chassis where someone may have stripped the factory slider in the body or you are worried about doing doing so when aligning your car.
that's what i thought.
is the toe setting you need outside the factory link's range of adjustment?if so,sounds like you have something bent.is it like this on both sides?if not,something's bent,or your thrust angle is off.
or,do you want it to get rid of the factory rubber joints?
Chris</TD></TR></TABLE>
there good to have if you have an older chassis where someone may have stripped the factory slider in the body or you are worried about doing doing so when aligning your car.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
matt98hb
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
14
Nov 3, 2003 07:08 AM
CivicSiRacer
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
4
May 12, 2003 03:18 AM