Clutchmaster FX400 (6-puck) vs. (4-puck)

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Apr 27, 2006 | 03:59 AM

RuffRhyno

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 398

Likes: 0

From: NY

Clutchmaster FX400 (6-puck) vs. (4-puck)

Anybody have experience with both/either? How is it for daily driving? Someone told me it is rather similar to the feeling of OEM, aside from a little harsher engagement and pedal pressure... This was for the 4 puck. I can't imagine this being true considering that is supposed to be the harsher of the two versions. I'm just looking for a safe and strong clutch that can handle the power of my turbo K24a2. Thanks

P.S.
No, I won't consider Exedy or ACT or any other clutch company. I've narrowed it down to the Clutchmaster.

Apr 27, 2006 | 07:15 PM

RuffRhyno

Thread Starter

Honda-Tech Member

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 398

Likes: 0

From: NY

Re: Clutchmaster FX400 (RuffRhyno)

bump

Apr 28, 2006 | 02:14 PM

Bense

B*a*n*n*e*d

Joined: Mar 2003

Posts: 9,783

Likes: 47

From: Greenville, South Carolina

Re: Clutchmaster FX400 (RuffRhyno)

4 puck will yield harsher engagement than the 6puck, I would go with a 6puck.

Although, I'd be careful launching, as well as brake boosting with a stock differential.