Dyno'd at Church Automotive, suprising numbers


Vortech SC, T1R Testpipe, Spugen Single Ti Exhaust, Slipping clutch

Most SC'd s2k's dyno 320 with my setup but for some reason berlina is running a little stronger.

Small Clip (Rained on the way down there, dirty *** car): http://videos.streetfire.net/v...A.htm

 

Nice numbers

 

Not bad at all. How many lbs of boost?

 

dyna-pack.........thats why its alittle higher

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fknfast &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dyna-pack.........thats why its alittle higher</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yeah most of the cars I have seen dyno'ed at Church's have been a little on the high side.

 

AEM EMS, injectors, and headwork then you will see 450.

Church sure has a way with tuning.

 

Yea its on 7.5 pounds right now. Im looking to get around 400 whp then save up to build the head

 

what engine management? any other mods than in your sig?

 

nope thats it...sc/e/tp

 

some people claim it read 3-4% high but im confident it read 8-10% higher than dynojet. AP2's have dynoed in the 220's and even some hit 230. But most of the SC's s2ks put down 320 there and there are even some with upgraded boost and tuning only hitting 330-340. All I know is that i was running about 95 octane and reset the ecu about 5 miles from his shop.

 

It's silly to compare dyno #'s from one place to another. Get your baselines on one dyno, continue mod'ing and retest on the same dyno to see the gains losses of each mod.

 

who is comparing numbers from different dynos? I just simply told him that it runs 8-10% higher than dynojet on average. All the other numbers I talked about were numbers from the same dyno I dyno'd on.

 

get a 4.40 or a 4.70 final drive..... u will be hella fast

 

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fknfast &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">dyna-pack.........thats why its alittle higher</TD></TR></TABLE>

yea but a RWD has more DRIVETRAIN loss!

i hate HP #'s....... the track is what proves it!!!

because before there were dynos, it was who got there FIRST!!! as in the end
enjoy the new found power boiii





Modified by SnoFlake at 12:20 PM 4/7/2006

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SnoFlake &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yea but a RWD has more DRIVETRAIN loss!</TD></TR></TABLE>

The only cars being compared are S2000s. So, although your statement is obvious, it's also irrelevant for this discussion.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SnoFlake &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">because there was a dyno there was who got there FIRST!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

I'm sorry, what?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by philadd &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">


I'm sorry, what?</TD></TR></TABLE>

edited......

 

aaaaaaaahhhhhhh, gotcha