h22 Accord track times
So I went to the track a few weeks ago and just now thought about posting
Track wasnt prepped and I couldnt go around the water box
90 Accord coupe DX
jdm h22/f22 tranny
i/h/e
Severe header leak and 60 series all season tires
I didnt have a tire gauge and really was just to lazy to mess with the pressure
Im going to cut few holes in the rear bumper to see if I can gain a few mph
I know the 60 is horrible I tried everything though track just wouldnt stick
r/t .537
60' 2.420
330 6.567
1/8 9.934
mph 73.69
1000 12.823
1/4 15.244@ 93mph
Im going to invest in some dr's
Track wasnt prepped and I couldnt go around the water box
90 Accord coupe DX
jdm h22/f22 tranny
i/h/e
Severe header leak and 60 series all season tires
I didnt have a tire gauge and really was just to lazy to mess with the pressure
Im going to cut few holes in the rear bumper to see if I can gain a few mph
I know the 60 is horrible I tried everything though track just wouldnt stick
r/t .537
60' 2.420
330 6.567
1/8 9.934
mph 73.69
1000 12.823
1/4 15.244@ 93mph
Im going to invest in some dr's
accords are heavy? i dont know about you but my 92 coupe with a jdm h22 w/ m2b4 lsd tranny. with just sri. and apexi ws2 exhaust ran 14.2 last weekend on drag radials.
Car is damn near 3000 lbs with me in it Damn right its heavy.
I know by my trap speed I should be running at least a 14.8 with a decent 60.
I think its time for a chassis swap. But like always money is the only factor stopping me.
I know by my trap speed I should be running at least a 14.8 with a decent 60.
I think its time for a chassis swap. But like always money is the only factor stopping me.
you will see a dramatic improvement with your times if you have the m2b4 tranny and slicks. what is your suspension setup? that also has a lot to do with times.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JSPECunit »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well the 90-93 accords arnt that heavy...you should gut that bitch and get some bfg ..</TD></TR></TABLE>
It is gutted dash,carpet and front seats all thats left my car My car weighs around 2650 plus me @ 270lbs(fatfuck i know) 90-93 accords arent that heavy? Pffft you are crazy.
Dr's and a 75 wet shot comming soon
It is gutted dash,carpet and front seats all thats left my car My car weighs around 2650 plus me @ 270lbs(fatfuck i know) 90-93 accords arent that heavy? Pffft you are crazy.
Dr's and a 75 wet shot comming soon
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by failuretwoyield »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you will see a dramatic improvement with your times if you have the m2b4 tranny and slicks. what is your suspension setup? that also has a lot to do with times.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I know i need the shorter geared tranny but this car is just for fun and I dont want to dropp that kind loot on a tranny right now. I have some no name blue lowering springs (they came on the car) maybe 1.5 " drop not much. with tokico blues in front and looks to be cheap oem replacements on the back. Im also running a 60 series tire which I know is only hurting me more with the long *** gears in that tranny. I thought about getting a h23 tranny since they are like half what I can find a m2b4 tranny for. Not sure if it would help all that much though
I know i need the shorter geared tranny but this car is just for fun and I dont want to dropp that kind loot on a tranny right now. I have some no name blue lowering springs (they came on the car) maybe 1.5 " drop not much. with tokico blues in front and looks to be cheap oem replacements on the back. Im also running a 60 series tire which I know is only hurting me more with the long *** gears in that tranny. I thought about getting a h23 tranny since they are like half what I can find a m2b4 tranny for. Not sure if it would help all that much though
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by k20pRoject »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">accords are heavy...</TD></TR></TABLE>
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JSPECunit »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">well the 90-93 accords arnt that heavy...you should gut that bitch and get some bfg ..</TD></TR></TABLE>
i vouch for that. my buddy has an H22 in his 91 ex with a sunroof. hes only slightly gutted (back seats) and has i/h/e running wit a spoon chipped P30 and he easily pulverizes Type R's. 6+ cars!!
H22
i vouch for that. my buddy has an H22 in his 91 ex with a sunroof. hes only slightly gutted (back seats) and has i/h/e running wit a spoon chipped P30 and he easily pulverizes Type R's. 6+ cars!!
H22
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by loyalty4eva »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your tranny is killing you swap it out.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Let me know when you ar ready to paypal me $600 and ill get right on that
Let me know when you ar ready to paypal me $600 and ill get right on that
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by failuretwoyield »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you will see a dramatic improvement with your times if you have the m2b4 tranny and slicks. what is your suspension setup? that also has a lot to do with times.</TD></TR></TABLE>
no name \ blue srpings (tokico maybe?) very mild drop no more than 1.5 with tokico blues in front and oem style in rear. I know slicks and that tranny will help tons.
no name \ blue srpings (tokico maybe?) very mild drop no more than 1.5 with tokico blues in front and oem style in rear. I know slicks and that tranny will help tons.
Actually I think you did fairly well on your run. Not many people run Accords at the drag strip, due to weight issues. Believe me... I know a little about racing this type of car. My opinion is don't waste time on drag radials, get a set of slicks instead. Sure you will have to change them at the track, but the E.T.'s will be much better.
If you change to A m2a4 or m2b4 (lsd) trans, you will have even more fun. IMO, adding the circuitworx 4.7 final to a m2a4 trans works really well. Suspension is also key to launching this car... that will take some work. I offer a cb7 traction bar that we make, that makes the car very manageable off the line. I pull low 1.7 60ft times on 24" slicks. I am making a bit more power now, so I changed to a 26" slick size and am expecting 1.6 60ft times this weekend. I am not posting this to brag, but to offer hope that improvements can be made to your set-up.
If you change to A m2a4 or m2b4 (lsd) trans, you will have even more fun. IMO, adding the circuitworx 4.7 final to a m2a4 trans works really well. Suspension is also key to launching this car... that will take some work. I offer a cb7 traction bar that we make, that makes the car very manageable off the line. I pull low 1.7 60ft times on 24" slicks. I am making a bit more power now, so I changed to a 26" slick size and am expecting 1.6 60ft times this weekend. I am not posting this to brag, but to offer hope that improvements can be made to your set-up.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by failuretwoyield »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">accords are heavy? i dont know about you but my 92 coupe with a jdm h22 w/ m2b4 lsd tranny. with just sri. and apexi ws2 exhaust ran 14.2 last weekend on drag radials. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Hell yeah they are heavy... I raced at NOPI last weekend in the Comp 4 class. All the cars were under or around 2000 lbs with driver. My car weighed in at 2550 with me in it. I make similliar power to the lighter cars running high 11's but run only high 12's due to the weight difference.
Hell yeah they are heavy... I raced at NOPI last weekend in the Comp 4 class. All the cars were under or around 2000 lbs with driver. My car weighed in at 2550 with me in it. I make similliar power to the lighter cars running high 11's but run only high 12's due to the weight difference.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2point6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Hell yeah they are heavy... I raced at NOPI last weekend in the Comp 4 class. All the cars were under or around 2000 lbs with driver. My car weighed in at 2550 with me in it. I make similliar power to the lighter cars running high 11's but run only high 12's due to the weight difference.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Can you tell me or pm me how you got it that light? I have a dx and its gutted and its still like 2650
Can you tell me or pm me how you got it that light? I have a dx and its gutted and its still like 2650
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2point6 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Hell yeah they are heavy... I raced at NOPI last weekend in the Comp 4 class. All the cars were under or around 2000 lbs with driver.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought the comp4 cars had a minumum weight of 2150?
Hell yeah they are heavy... I raced at NOPI last weekend in the Comp 4 class. All the cars were under or around 2000 lbs with driver.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I thought the comp4 cars had a minumum weight of 2150?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Launchpad »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Can you tell me or pm me how you got it that light? I have a dx and its gutted and its still like 2650</TD></TR></TABLE>
In my full interior 90 accord I ran 14.7 all day long pullin 2.2 60s & then the guy I sold it too pulled out some interior, got some suspension & tires & ran 14 flat all day long with low 2.1 60s. It was a jdm h22, flywheel, clutch, intake & exhaust. I believe thats all. It was a 4 door.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 94sisol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">In my full interior 90 accord I ran 14.7 all day long pullin 2.2 60s & then the guy I sold it too pulled out some interior, got some suspension & tires & ran 14 flat all day long with low 2.1 60s. It was a jdm h22, flywheel, clutch, intake & exhaust. I believe thats all. It was a 4 door. </TD></TR></TABLE>
The previous owner went 14.7@94 with a 2.1 60 (got the slip right in front of me )but he was on dr's I lost a 1 mph but i think its because im running a tall *** 60 series tire? Think thats possible?
The previous owner went 14.7@94 with a 2.1 60 (got the slip right in front of me )but he was on dr's I lost a 1 mph but i think its because im running a tall *** 60 series tire? Think thats possible?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Launchpad »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The previous owner went 14.7@94 with a 2.1 60 (got the slip right in front of me )but he was on dr's I lost a 1 mph but i think its because im running a tall *** 60 series tire? Think thats possible?</TD></TR></TABLE>
More than likely. Throw some better tires up front, hell I didn't even have very much tread left on my tires & I still pulled 2.2s. High 2.2s but still. After the new owner did the suspension & tires, he pulled low 2.1s. How he gained .7 from that & some weight reduction i'm not exactly sure but good for him. That car was a freak though. You should atleast expect 14.7-14.9 out of your car. Just by knockin your 60 down to a 2.2. So just snag some better tires for up front & practice launching.
More than likely. Throw some better tires up front, hell I didn't even have very much tread left on my tires & I still pulled 2.2s. High 2.2s but still. After the new owner did the suspension & tires, he pulled low 2.1s. How he gained .7 from that & some weight reduction i'm not exactly sure but good for him. That car was a freak though. You should atleast expect 14.7-14.9 out of your car. Just by knockin your 60 down to a 2.2. So just snag some better tires for up front & practice launching.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
AccordH22-123
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
53
Jun 14, 2004 11:44 PM





