PROOF!!!! Sohc non vtec.. 300+whp and 11 sec runs..Vitara setup

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default PROOF!!!! Sohc non vtec.. 300+whp and 11 sec runs..Vitara setup

Sometime ago i posted a thread about someone i know who has a 98 DX coupe, d16y7 motor and how he dynoed 300+ whp and some amazing torque numbers (comonly i've seen higher than usual torque numbers with vitaras)and also how he ran 11.9 sec runs. Some guys wanted a slip and a dyno sheet as proof and i said i was gonna get ahold of the guy to get it..I keep my word so here it is.


Dynoed 315whp and 297lbs/ft with Vitara pistons on a Y7 engine.I dunno why the torque graph goes whack at the end...Probably due to pressing the clutch while reving the car when it redlined.... The car is still using OEM OBDII ECU and is tuned via APEXi AFR(yes i know u guys hate it)

The car ran last week 11.8 @ 116mph with just 1.89 o-60fts...Driver weights 260lbs so the car is not exactly light... Car has A/C hooked up and running.Run was on Race gas but with full exhaust hooked up.. 24-26PSI on a toy turbo --->T3 .42.48 off a volvo

I hope this is enough proof for you guys...


Car #7832


Dyno sheet:


This guy has been running the Vitaras for way more than me..Around 3 1/2yrs with vitaras for him. He was my inspiration to do the vitaras on my engine and boost it. This is the same guy that drove my car when it ran 12.44 @ 111mph
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #2  
AbitAvenger's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,907
Likes: 0
Default

INSANE!!!!! VITARAS

Is there a reason he doesn't do a vtec head swap?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #3  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

why?..Is not needed, and to make a point...lol

you dont need a swap...you dont always need vtec(is not always better)...and it is simpler to tune as well..

but i dont have any proof that non vtec is better for turbo but atleast here in P.R. all the non vtec turbo setups are generaly faster than the vtecs. Non vtec heads seems to accept boost very well
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #4  
turbosi03's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,210
Likes: 0
From: Now in SoCal, CA, USA
Default Re: (fjt)

interesting... damn 11.8 @116mph I ran 13 flat with 119mph trap... my car is slow
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #5  
vtac sonn's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: theodore, alabama, usa
Default Re: (turbosi03)

what tires was this achieved with
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #6  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default Re: (vtac sonn)

Slicks.. 24 X 8 X 13"
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:43 AM
  #7  
SL0WEGG's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 7,489
Likes: 0
From: Minnesota
Default Re: (fjt)

awesome!!d-block , curious how he managed to push 300whp out of that small *** snail. i didnt even think you could get 23 lbs out of it
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:51 AM
  #8  
BlackCRX's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 653
Likes: 0
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Default

bump for crazy power on a non vtec sohc
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:56 AM
  #9  
alexsracing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, Tx, usa
Default

nice
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:03 AM
  #10  
Kowalski's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
From: Funk, Squad, USA
Default Re: (alexsracing)

Dammmn on a T3!!!

That's inspiring.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:09 AM
  #11  
turboEGhatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 959
Likes: 0
From: work
Default Re: (fjt)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fjt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why?..Is not needed, and to make a point...lol

you dont need a swap...you dont always need vtec(is not always better)...and it is simpler to tune as well..

but i dont have any proof that non vtec is better for turbo but atleast here in P.R. all the non vtec turbo setups are generaly faster than the vtecs. Non vtec heads seems to accept boost very well</TD></TR></TABLE>

VTEC heads flow better and let you run bigger cams. They'll let you rev higher and make more power per pound of boost, but if you're limiting yourself with a tiny T3 turbo it really doesn't matter what head you're running. Try and build a 500 WHP non-vtec SOHC, and see how much that head holds you back then.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #12  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

yeah vtec head Should flow better and has more cam and upgrade options but as i said it is not needed...

In here there are alot other cars other than Hondas that with a sohc heads and no vtec make power..There are some Mitsubishi mirage(Technicas in P.R.) guys here that put down 400+whp on their 1.8lt sohc motors..so i guess its just a matter of time when we will start seeing 400+whp sohc non vtec hondas .. The most i know so far is 385whp on a sohc non vtec head ..

Anyways i think 500whp+ on a light Honda is really pointless..I wouldnt do it for a street car. It will be ridiculuos how lil traction there would be with that kind of power.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #13  
Iceman05's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 748
Likes: 0
From: Del Rio, TX
Default

im even more inspired! fjt, u know what rods he was using? any more info on his setup?
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 11:42 AM
  #14  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

Eagle rods were installed not too long ago but he was using PG6 rods when he had 275-280whp
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 12:23 PM
  #15  
SPOON_BeIgHtEeNsEe's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 12,063
Likes: 0
From: Spokane, WA
Default Re: PROOF!!!! Sohc non vtec.. 300+whp and 11 sec runs..Vitara setup (fjt)

so the head is stock? what kind of tranny/clutch is he running...?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 03:04 AM
  #16  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

No the head is not stock..It has a Port & Polish and i think a 3* angle valve job...everything else is stock(Cam,valvetrain)
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 09:24 AM
  #17  
alexsracing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
From: McAllen, Tx, usa
Default

what size injectors was he running?
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:00 AM
  #18  
nonvtecD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 4
From: Watertown, CT, USA
Default

Crazy amount of torque
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 10:08 AM
  #19  
fjt's Avatar
fjt
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,659
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default Re: (alexsracing)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by alexsracing &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what size injectors was he running?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I dont know exactly but its more than 600cc...if im not mistaken i am pretty sure its 620cc's
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 12:27 PM
  #20  
GiNuWiNe's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA, U.S.
Default Re: (fjt)

I'm kind of specious about a little T3 .42/48 putting down 300whp on a D16, but good numbers nonetheless.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 12:42 PM
  #21  
nonvtecD's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 4
From: Watertown, CT, USA
Default Re: (GiNuWiNe)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GiNuWiNe &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm kind of specious about a little T3 .42/48 putting down 300whp on a D16, but good numbers nonetheless.</TD></TR></TABLE>

suspicious
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #22  
H.A.R.T B18C1EG6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,853
Likes: 2
From: PLAYBOY MANSION
Default Re: (turbosi03)

Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 12:56 PM
  #23  
Mr. Vapor's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 3,523
Likes: 0
From: GO LEAFS GO, NY, USA
Default Re: (nonvtecD)

wow...im in shock to say the least.

so many things going against everything we're "told"

-D-block (yea us ever so elitest B-block guys will never give it enough credit)
-essentially a AFC hack/tune on the OBDII!!!!!!
-WHAT?!?! NO VTAKk?

thats amazing man.
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 02:31 PM
  #24  
yee SERIOUS's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 22,150
Likes: 0
From: The Village Hidden in the Leaves: Seattle, WA
Default

ninja! ninja! ninja! ninja!
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 04:15 PM
  #25  
KeyserSoze's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,832
Likes: 0
From: RIP Duke of Turbo, CA
Default Re: PROOF!!!! Sohc non vtec.. 300+whp and 11 sec runs..Vitara setup (fjt)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by fjt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Dynoed 315whp and 297lbs/ft with Vitara pistons on a Y7 engine.I dunno why the torque graph goes whack at the end...Probably due to pressing the clutch while reving the car when it redlined.... The car is still using OEM OBDII ECU and is tuned via APEXi AFR(yes i know u guys hate it)</TD></TR></TABLE>

Maybe a bit of boost creep (on a straight t3 though?)? Just a guess.

Nice times, and nice #'s.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:12 AM.