Honda Prelude All Model Preludes

RMF/i/e Dyno Results

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:02 AM
  #1  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default RMF/i/e Dyno Results

well the day of reckoning finally came. fininshed up the tuning and and got her dynoed. i tuned with crome. the results are well, ehhh. i lowballed my estimates because we all know too well how devastating real HP numbers can be after all the time sweat and money poured into our rides. at the very worst i was expecting 170whp considering a few issues earlier on. but my real goal was 180whp. mods are RMF header, AEMV2, carsound hiflow 2.5 cat, greddy evo2, chipped ecu, crome tuned.
all pulls 4th gear not to happy with the results but not completely terrible either, just expected more.
here is baseline:



final pull:
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:06 AM
  #2  
ralpheezy's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville, Florida, USA
Default

that header is designed for work with a lot of internal block and head work so don't be sad.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:08 AM
  #3  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (ralpheyizzle)

yeah its def designed for a even mildly cammed engine but thought it would pull out some more on a stock block. oh well. cams here i come. thinking of going with skunk2 stg1 for a nice mild cam. daily driver.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:17 AM
  #4  
Soda Popinski's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

Have you ever compression tested your motor? Those numbers are what the motor should be making stock! And just to make sure, this is a h22 right?
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:20 AM
  #5  
The Weather Man's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,241
Likes: 0
From: The Wizard Of Oz, State Rd 1505, Section 8
Default

yep. A good cam setup and higher compression - and you'll be in there.

The numbers still do seem kinda low though.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #6  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Matador)

h22, and yes compression tested before dynoing. all within 220-235
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:33 AM
  #7  
Soda Popinski's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

the gap should be 5-10 psi each cylinder. Something doesnt seem right. Those numbers are really low.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:42 AM
  #8  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Matador)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Matador &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the gap should be 5-10 psi each cylinder. Something doesnt seem right. Those numbers are really low. </TD></TR></TABLE>
how do you mean?? 220-225-230-235 like that or from only a gap of 5-10 between them all like 220-220-230-235??
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:44 AM
  #9  
Soda Popinski's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

Yea your comp numbers are good, i was talking about the whp numbers though. It just isnt adding up.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:50 AM
  #10  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Matador)

oh. yeah i hear ya. im a little disappointed. only thing i can think of is a bad tune. which i was told in another forum. but he seemed to know his stuff or i just happened to have started with a weaker engine. i have seen graphs of stock or mild ludes putting out as low as 150-160 whp so i dont know. how many graphs of RMF'ed h22's on a stock engine are there??


Modified by 91preyludesi at 4:29 PM 2/20/2006
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:53 AM
  #11  
Soda Popinski's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,124
Likes: 0
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

Not much, but regardless, their header is well designed. Ive seen graphs of SMSP header, on a stock JDM h22, making 200whp. SMSP and RMF are both well designed and their gains should bge similar. I dont get it.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 09:59 AM
  #12  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Matador)

i dont get it either, healthy engine at least relatively. dont know why such low numbers im hoping i can open up the potetnital of this header with a mild cam.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #13  
98vtec's Avatar
moderator emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 6
From: Cantonment, FL
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

get me those bin's bitch
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #14  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (98vtec)

HAHAH there he is. i emailed him last nite i think i'll just call him. he is actually a member on here and talked to john to get the bin for my basemap i got from phearable. the only thing i noticed on the graph was a dip after vtec where it got a little rich. he did smooth it out at least a little from the basline run
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 10:48 AM
  #15  
hj.'s Avatar
hj.
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Lv, Dominican Republic
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 91preyludesi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">oh. yeah i hear ya. im a little disappointed. only thing i cant think of is a bad tune. which i was told in another forum. or i just happened to have started with a weaker engine. i have seen graphs of stock or mild ludes putting out as low as 150-160 whp so i dont know. how many graphs of RMF'ed h22's on a stock engine are there??</TD></TR></TABLE>

well...it's not well tuned..look a your A/F graf...a traced a line in 13..start downs(12.6)..goes up(13.5)...then goes down(12.8)..goes up and it stays up(13.4)....well my friend...it's bad tuned...should be 13~1

look a this link...look a/f in this dyno sheet...that's how your should look like...it's the blue line...https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1530692

when you correct that...you will be happy....another thing...most guys that have other companies headers(smsp, hytech,SSR etc)...have a good 2.5 exhaust and muffler...euro r intake manifold...o ported stock manifold...don't have hi flow cats...what i'm trying to say..the have a good intake and exhaust system that can maximaze their engine...

you can't just expect a miracle just bolting a header and have a crappy tune...sorry...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 11:12 AM
  #16  
98vtec's Avatar
moderator emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 6
From: Cantonment, FL
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

i prolly have the bin that john used on my computer. But the basemap is not what i am concerned with.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 11:29 AM
  #17  
LudeyKrus's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,768
Likes: 1
From: Flowery Branch, Ga
Default

Well doggone, I can't see the tune here at work.

I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 12:02 PM
  #18  
hj.'s Avatar
hj.
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Lv, Dominican Republic
Default Re: (LudeyKrus)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LudeyKrus &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.</TD></TR></TABLE>

just saying that's not well tuned...nobody is making a big sh*t about it...he gained 8hp and 7tq peak with a crappy a/f ratio...

he needs to get well tuned...and a better exhaust system...then dyno...
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 12:14 PM
  #19  
flyrod's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,072
Likes: 0
From: land of the sheep, home of the hypocrite
Default Re: (hj.)

That air fuel looks pretty good. Thanks for posting your results!
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #20  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default

i dont see whats wrong with the xhasut system. granted it could be better, its not a true 2.5in exhuast but its not terrible either.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 12:59 PM
  #21  
Nalude92's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: Oside, CA
Default Re: (91preyludesi)

hmmm....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hj. &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

well...it's not well tuned..look a your A/F graf...a traced a line in 13..start downs(12.6)..goes up(13.5)...then goes down(12.8)..goes up and it stays up(13.4)....well my friend...it's bad tuned...should be 13~1

look a this link...look a/f in this dyno sheet...that's how your should look like...it's the blue line...https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1530692

when you correct that...you will be happy....another thing...most guys that have other companies headers(smsp, hytech,SSR etc)...have a good 2.5 exhaust and muffler...euro r intake manifold...o ported stock manifold...don't have hi flow cats...what i'm trying to say..the have a good intake and exhaust system that can maximaze their engine...

you can't just expect a miracle just bolting a header and have a crappy tune...sorry... </TD></TR></TABLE>

i have to agree with him on this one. BUT....
close setup, with stock block
euro-r im, stock tb, head built, smsp header, a'pexi intake, 2.5 cat, no tune!!!!!!!!! power-fc running 440/cc min-
made 194whp baseline- REALLY DAMN RICH!!!
WE are talking.....tooo muccchhh damn fuel!!!
figured out from dyno baseline, just a flat curve, even in vtec were it stumbles due to fuel.

hope you get your car tuned (especially during the vtec crossover where it goes rich) and the results are better.
good luck!
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 05:15 PM
  #22  
98vtec's Avatar
moderator emeritus
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 16,357
Likes: 6
From: Cantonment, FL
Default Re: (LudeyKrus)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LudeyKrus &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well doggone, I can't see the tune here at work.

I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.</TD></TR></TABLE>

thats what i want to look at when he sends me the bin.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #23  
mgags7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 15,050
Likes: 3
Default

dude my h22 is stock inside, and with a 60mm catback, no cat, rmf header, and j's racing style intake, i put down 183whp on the rlz dynapack, which dynoes stock h22s at like 135-145....

your numbers are very low, whether it be your tune that is making the whole difference or something else, you are missing at least 10-15whp.....

on the tq side, i put down 141....and my line was a good bit flatter than yours.....remember that the dynapack reads very low....that should be somewhere around 155-160 dynojet....but i have yet to hit one....

that was with power steering on there too....

is it a usdm or jdm h22??
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 06:33 PM
  #24  
91preyludesi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Default Re: (mgags7)

^^usdm h22a4.
Reply
Old Feb 19, 2006 | 08:16 PM
  #25  
Daboi630's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX, 77082
Default

them fighting words

baseline run was with all mods UNTUNED right? well just think of this, maybe you would have made only 155-160 with stock header.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:25 AM.