RMF/i/e Dyno Results
well the day of reckoning finally came. fininshed up the tuning and and got her dynoed. i tuned with crome. the results are well, ehhh. i lowballed my estimates because we all know too well how devastating real HP numbers can be after all the time sweat and money poured into our rides. at the very worst i was expecting 170whp considering a few issues earlier on. but my real goal was 180whp. mods are RMF header, AEMV2, carsound hiflow 2.5 cat, greddy evo2, chipped ecu, crome tuned.
all pulls 4th gear not to happy with the results but not completely terrible either, just expected more.
here is baseline:

final pull:
all pulls 4th gear not to happy with the results but not completely terrible either, just expected more.
here is baseline:

final pull:
yeah its def designed for a even mildly cammed engine but thought it would pull out some more on a stock block. oh well. cams here i come. thinking of going with skunk2 stg1 for a nice mild cam. daily driver.
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Matador »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">the gap should be 5-10 psi each cylinder. Something doesnt seem right. Those numbers are really low. </TD></TR></TABLE>
how do you mean?? 220-225-230-235 like that or from only a gap of 5-10 between them all like 220-220-230-235??
how do you mean?? 220-225-230-235 like that or from only a gap of 5-10 between them all like 220-220-230-235??
oh. yeah i hear ya. im a little disappointed. only thing i can think of is a bad tune. which i was told in another forum. but he seemed to know his stuff or i just happened to have started with a weaker engine. i have seen graphs of stock or mild ludes putting out as low as 150-160 whp so i dont know. how many graphs of RMF'ed h22's on a stock engine are there??
Modified by 91preyludesi at 4:29 PM 2/20/2006
Modified by 91preyludesi at 4:29 PM 2/20/2006
Not much, but regardless, their header is well designed. Ive seen graphs of SMSP header, on a stock JDM h22, making 200whp. SMSP and RMF are both well designed and their gains should bge similar. I dont get it.
HAHAH there he is. i emailed him last nite i think i'll just call him. he is actually a member on here and talked to john to get the bin for my basemap i got from phearable. the only thing i noticed on the graph was a dip after vtec where it got a little rich. he did smooth it out at least a little from the basline run
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 91preyludesi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">oh. yeah i hear ya. im a little disappointed. only thing i cant think of is a bad tune. which i was told in another forum. or i just happened to have started with a weaker engine. i have seen graphs of stock or mild ludes putting out as low as 150-160 whp so i dont know. how many graphs of RMF'ed h22's on a stock engine are there??</TD></TR></TABLE>
well...it's not well tuned..look a your A/F graf...a traced a line in 13..start downs(12.6)..goes up(13.5)...then goes down(12.8)..goes up and it stays up(13.4)....well my friend...it's bad tuned...should be 13~1
look a this link...look a/f in this dyno sheet...that's how your should look like...it's the blue line...https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1530692
when you correct that...you will be happy....another thing...most guys that have other companies headers(smsp, hytech,SSR etc)...have a good 2.5 exhaust and muffler...euro r intake manifold...o ported stock manifold...don't have hi flow cats...what i'm trying to say..the have a good intake and exhaust system that can maximaze their engine...
you can't just expect a miracle just bolting a header and have a crappy tune...sorry...
well...it's not well tuned..look a your A/F graf...a traced a line in 13..start downs(12.6)..goes up(13.5)...then goes down(12.8)..goes up and it stays up(13.4)....well my friend...it's bad tuned...should be 13~1
look a this link...look a/f in this dyno sheet...that's how your should look like...it's the blue line...https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1530692
when you correct that...you will be happy....another thing...most guys that have other companies headers(smsp, hytech,SSR etc)...have a good 2.5 exhaust and muffler...euro r intake manifold...o ported stock manifold...don't have hi flow cats...what i'm trying to say..the have a good intake and exhaust system that can maximaze their engine...
you can't just expect a miracle just bolting a header and have a crappy tune...sorry...
Well doggone, I can't see the tune here at work.
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LudeyKrus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.</TD></TR></TABLE>
just saying that's not well tuned...nobody is making a big sh*t about it...he gained 8hp and 7tq peak with a crappy a/f ratio...
he needs to get well tuned...and a better exhaust system...then dyno...
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.</TD></TR></TABLE>
just saying that's not well tuned...nobody is making a big sh*t about it...he gained 8hp and 7tq peak with a crappy a/f ratio...
he needs to get well tuned...and a better exhaust system...then dyno...
hmmm....
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hj. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
well...it's not well tuned..look a your A/F graf...a traced a line in 13..start downs(12.6)..goes up(13.5)...then goes down(12.8)..goes up and it stays up(13.4)....well my friend...it's bad tuned...should be 13~1
look a this link...look a/f in this dyno sheet...that's how your should look like...it's the blue line...https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1530692
when you correct that...you will be happy....another thing...most guys that have other companies headers(smsp, hytech,SSR etc)...have a good 2.5 exhaust and muffler...euro r intake manifold...o ported stock manifold...don't have hi flow cats...what i'm trying to say..the have a good intake and exhaust system that can maximaze their engine...
you can't just expect a miracle just bolting a header and have a crappy tune...sorry... </TD></TR></TABLE>
i have to agree with him on this one. BUT....
close setup, with stock block
euro-r im, stock tb, head built, smsp header, a'pexi intake, 2.5 cat, no tune!!!!!!!!! power-fc running 440/cc min-
made 194whp baseline- REALLY DAMN RICH!!!
WE are talking.....tooo muccchhh damn fuel!!!
figured out from dyno baseline, just a flat curve, even in vtec were it stumbles due to fuel.
hope you get your car tuned (especially during the vtec crossover where it goes rich) and the results are better.
good luck!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hj. »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
well...it's not well tuned..look a your A/F graf...a traced a line in 13..start downs(12.6)..goes up(13.5)...then goes down(12.8)..goes up and it stays up(13.4)....well my friend...it's bad tuned...should be 13~1
look a this link...look a/f in this dyno sheet...that's how your should look like...it's the blue line...https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1530692
when you correct that...you will be happy....another thing...most guys that have other companies headers(smsp, hytech,SSR etc)...have a good 2.5 exhaust and muffler...euro r intake manifold...o ported stock manifold...don't have hi flow cats...what i'm trying to say..the have a good intake and exhaust system that can maximaze their engine...
you can't just expect a miracle just bolting a header and have a crappy tune...sorry... </TD></TR></TABLE>
i have to agree with him on this one. BUT....
close setup, with stock block
euro-r im, stock tb, head built, smsp header, a'pexi intake, 2.5 cat, no tune!!!!!!!!! power-fc running 440/cc min-
made 194whp baseline- REALLY DAMN RICH!!!
WE are talking.....tooo muccchhh damn fuel!!!
figured out from dyno baseline, just a flat curve, even in vtec were it stumbles due to fuel.
hope you get your car tuned (especially during the vtec crossover where it goes rich) and the results are better.
good luck!
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LudeyKrus »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well doggone, I can't see the tune here at work.
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what i want to look at when he sends me the bin.
I want to say the a/f doesn't sound like it would give as big of a loss as you guys are making it out to be, so I'm going to say check the timing tables and see what kind of spark advance you're getting in VTEC.</TD></TR></TABLE>
thats what i want to look at when he sends me the bin.
dude my h22 is stock inside, and with a 60mm catback, no cat, rmf header, and j's racing style intake, i put down 183whp on the rlz dynapack, which dynoes stock h22s at like 135-145....
your numbers are very low, whether it be your tune that is making the whole difference or something else, you are missing at least 10-15whp.....
on the tq side, i put down 141....and my line was a good bit flatter than yours.....remember that the dynapack reads very low....that should be somewhere around 155-160 dynojet....but i have yet to hit one....
that was with power steering on there too....
is it a usdm or jdm h22??
your numbers are very low, whether it be your tune that is making the whole difference or something else, you are missing at least 10-15whp.....
on the tq side, i put down 141....and my line was a good bit flatter than yours.....remember that the dynapack reads very low....that should be somewhere around 155-160 dynojet....but i have yet to hit one....
that was with power steering on there too....
is it a usdm or jdm h22??



