1994 gsr
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: sacto, CA, usa
Re: 1994 gsr (blk94gsr)
94 n 95 r the best year due to their obd 1.....ease of tuning.....honestly the 95 is the best year becuz its 90-110 lbs lighter.....still most gsr r the same in about everything except some changes in the 99-01 model...hope this help out a little...
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: Bay Area, CA
Re: 1994 gsr (finest_GSR)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by finest_GSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">94 n 95 r the best year due to their obd 1.....ease of tuning.....honestly the 95 is the best year becuz its 90-110 lbs lighter.....still most gsr r the same in about everything except some changes in the 99-01 model...hope this help out a little...</TD></TR></TABLE>
Trending Topics
Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,948
Likes: 0
From: Sparks, NV, USA
Re: 1994 gsr (beeateteen)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by finest_GSR »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">honestly the 95 is the best year becuz its 90-110 lbs lighter.....</TD></TR></TABLE>Can anyone confirm this? If so why did it seem that most 94s performed better than 95s in stock form? That's a lot of weight.
EDIT~ Nevermind found it.
http://www.team-integra.net/se...D=144
For lazy people. Looks like 94-97 GSRs were all 2667 then in 98-99 they were 2665 and 2000 it was 2672. Doesn't show 01.
EDIT~ Nevermind found it.
http://www.team-integra.net/se...D=144
For lazy people. Looks like 94-97 GSRs were all 2667 then in 98-99 they were 2665 and 2000 it was 2672. Doesn't show 01.
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 12,497
Likes: 2
From: Newark/Bay Area, CA., USA
Re: 1994 gsr (2000turbogsr)
Downside to having a 94-95 gsr... Big *** ABS Unit, lots of sound detening (spelling) material underneath the carpet, car is already over 10 years old meaning more and more things are starting to rattle as the years go on. Yes obd 1 has its benefits over the obd2 models, but as for being faster, I dont think thats 100% true in some cases. I think there was a big thread about the difference between the obd1 and the obd2 tegs...i'll try searching for it.
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 334
Likes: 0
From: so cal 760, 858, 619, ca, usa
Re: 1994 gsr (Sack Master)
[QUOTE=Sack Master]Can anyone confirm this? If so why did it seem that most 94s performed better than 95s in stock form? That's a lot of weight.
i have to agree with this from personal experience. when i first drove the 94 gsr stock from my sister, i never felt any teg that pulls me so hard when secondaries hit. in stock form, my 94 would smoke a 95, and all obd2 gsr's also
i have to agree with this from personal experience. when i first drove the 94 gsr stock from my sister, i never felt any teg that pulls me so hard when secondaries hit. in stock form, my 94 would smoke a 95, and all obd2 gsr's also
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,748
Likes: 1
From: Cincinnati, Ohio
Re: 1994 gsr (Sack Master)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Sack Master »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Can anyone confirm this? If so why did it seem that most 94s performed better than 95s in stock form? That's a lot of weight.
EDIT~ Nevermind found it.
http://www.team-integra.net/se...D=144
For lazy people. Looks like 94-97 GSRs were all 2667 then in 98-99 they were 2665 and 2000 it was 2672. Doesn't show 01.</TD></TR></TABLE>
This always weirded me out. I've heard the 3rd gen GSRs are around 2670, which is what most places say, but kid I know has a 94-95 GSR and it weighed like 2470 w/ a turbo kit and w/o the 'trunk junk'. Weird.
EDIT~ Nevermind found it.
http://www.team-integra.net/se...D=144
For lazy people. Looks like 94-97 GSRs were all 2667 then in 98-99 they were 2665 and 2000 it was 2672. Doesn't show 01.</TD></TR></TABLE>
This always weirded me out. I've heard the 3rd gen GSRs are around 2670, which is what most places say, but kid I know has a 94-95 GSR and it weighed like 2470 w/ a turbo kit and w/o the 'trunk junk'. Weird.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post