this is my set up
skunk2 stage2 camshafts
type S piston and rod
ported head wit valves train upgrade
ported IM and 70mm TB, removed the butterfly thing
injen sri
hondata s100
440cc injector
rmf header
2.5 straight pipe
aem fuel reg
stock cam gears
tuned on 17in 5zigen rims

am i suppose to make more power or 225 seem ok??? cuz my mechanic said im suppose to make 235 at least....

 

I'm certainly no expert but it looks like you need to spend some more time tuning that Hondata.

 

H22 and stage 2 camshaft... only 225hp... daamn... ....there's gotta be somethin' wrong right?!

 

Something is definitely wrong.

That means those mods only dished out roughly 50whp over stock.

 

any clue wat is wrong????

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Crono139 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">That means those mods only dished out roughly 50whp over stock. </TD></TR></TABLE>
50 HP to the WHEELS, and on an N/A motor, I'm no N/A guy but I think that's a pretty damned good bump in power.

An H22 stock wheel hp is like 160, that's more like a 65 hp bump no?

 

tune a little more.

but pretty good numbers.


remember, the dyno is testing power to the wheels, stock HP on a h22 is tested at the crank

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dtran002 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ported IM and 70mm TB, removed the butterfly thing</TD></TR></TABLE>

removed tha what?!? Not sure, but I don't think that's a good thing.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AFAccord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">removed tha what?!? Not sure, but I don't think that's a good thing.</TD></TR></TABLE>

can you say full throttle all the time?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dtran002 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">ported IM and 70mm TB, removed the butterfly thing</TD></TR></TABLE>

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AFAccord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">removed tha what?!? Not sure, but I don't think that's a good thing.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I think he was refer to the secondary butterflies in the intake manifold. I could be wrong but I don't think he would be refering to the butterfly in the throttle body.

 

Yeah, I was thinking WOT all the time too, but like I said, I'm not sure. Not familiar with the secondaries.

 

the secondaries are part #14 in the pictures below.



I've heard of others removing them as well.

 

Hmmm... That's very interesting. What would be the original purpose?

 

original purpose of the secondaries is to close off the shorter second set of runners at low RPM. Thus making less air travel further giving more bottom end torque. Then as you reach higher in the RPM's the secondaries open. This allows more air in a shorter path giving you more power up top.

Thats my understanding of it.

I'm currently looking into using an H23 IM on my F22B1. Both the H22 and H23 motors have those secondary butterflies as well as the F22A6 from the 90-93 Accord EX.

 

Nice. Sounds like some good stuff. Pardon my thread jack here.

 

have you done a compression test?

 

im no h22 expert but is that torque right&gt;? seems low?

 

Seems in line with the hp numbers. H22's not a torque champ by any means.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TouringAccord &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">original purpose of the secondaries is to close off the shorter second set of runners at low RPM. Thus making less air travel further giving more bottom end torque. Then as you reach higher in the RPM's the secondaries open. This allows more air in a shorter path giving you more power up top.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Seems right.

That's why the H22 sounds like a bat out of hell higher in the powerband.

 

i dun really noe if that low or not, thats why i was hopin to find out through u guyz, it juss with all the mods, thought i would get somethin better than in the 225 u noe...and i havent done a compression test yet, do i need to???

 

As I said, in relation to the hp results, the torque seems right. 200hp/156tq is stock for the H22 I believe, but given the drive train loss, your mods seem to be doing well to overcome that.

15.8 1/4 mile?? Sounds like your tires resemble something found on my favorite toy of the golden years, Power Wheels!

You'll have to take the educated opinions of others on here more familiar with the H22 regarding your overall numbers.

 

That would be the 1st thing i would do, no compression=no power

 

I would look to getting rid of that jump at Vtec and smooth out the power band. Your tq does seem low, I would do a compression check I had less tq than that on the dyno and I found that I had really low compression in 1 cylinder

 

o ok, i'll ask them to do that wen then, as far as the vtec dip thing, i heard they said somethin bout my collector being too small, i got rmf 2.5in i think, does that restrict alot?

 

hey guyz, my after i took for a drive today, i notice the sound is very quiet than usual, and it throw me cel code, i checked and it gave me a code 43, which is fuel supply system circuit, is that correct??? and wat that mean? sorry dun really noe much about those stuff