Jackson Racing vs. Turbonetics
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,655
Likes: 0
From: Minneap
Jackson Racing vs. Turbonetics
I have a b16 with a crower 2.0L stroker kit, and i cant decide if i should go with the sc or the turbo. I like the extra power of the turbo but also like the driveability of the SC. please help
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 1
From: Simi Valley, CA, USA
Re: (Boostage)
I hate stroked motors. I'm not sure why anyone with a turbo would stroke their motor.
Even though I hate JRSC's with a fiery passion, it might be the better option because it will make peak power at a lower RPM. Less chance of engine failure.
Even though I hate JRSC's with a fiery passion, it might be the better option because it will make peak power at a lower RPM. Less chance of engine failure.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15,814
Likes: 8
From: Dallas, TX, USA
Re: (EnzoSpeed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EnzoSpeed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I hate stroked motors. I'm not sure why anyone with a turbo would stroke their motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why is that?
Why is that?
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 789
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA, U.S.
Re: (EnzoSpeed)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EnzoSpeed »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I hate stroked motors. I'm not sure why anyone with a turbo would stroke their motor.
Even though I hate JRSC's with a fiery passion, it might be the better option because it will make peak power at a lower RPM. Less chance of engine failure.</TD></TR></TABLE>
If you want peak power at a lower rpm, just get a smaller turbo..
Even though I hate JRSC's with a fiery passion, it might be the better option because it will make peak power at a lower RPM. Less chance of engine failure.</TD></TR></TABLE>
If you want peak power at a lower rpm, just get a smaller turbo..
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 1
From: Simi Valley, CA, USA
Re: (tony1)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tony1 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Why is that?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I just don't like the idea of a longer stroke when an overbore is a better way to increase displacement. Messing with the r/s ratio seems to be overlooked a lot.
Why is that?</TD></TR></TABLE>
I just don't like the idea of a longer stroke when an overbore is a better way to increase displacement. Messing with the r/s ratio seems to be overlooked a lot.
Trending Topics
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 786
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Re: (EnzoSpeed)
Messing with the R/S ratios seems to be overemphasized a lot. See sig.
I think wrist pin location, smaller ringlands, and less material in the crown of the piston should be much greater concerns when looking at a stroker setup with a turbo, not the rod-to-stroke ratio.
I think wrist pin location, smaller ringlands, and less material in the crown of the piston should be much greater concerns when looking at a stroker setup with a turbo, not the rod-to-stroke ratio.
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,789
Likes: 1
From: Simi Valley, CA, USA
Re: (tokes1320)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by tokes1320 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Messing with the R/S ratios seems to be overemphasized a lot. See sig.
I think wrist pin location, smaller ringlands, and less material in the crown of the piston should be much greater concerns when looking at a stroker setup with a turbo, not the rod-to-stroke ratio.</TD></TR></TABLE>
See sig? Well I'm glad you're convinced, unfortunately the rest of engine building world knows it's true importance.
That's why some D16's are turned into 1.5's. It's also why the D17's suck and no one ever uses them.
Stroking a motor is just a bad idea. Just look at the way an engine was designed to work. Increasing the stroke means the engine has to indure tremendous amounts of stress and waste more energy to reverse the direction of piston travel after every stroke.
I think wrist pin location, smaller ringlands, and less material in the crown of the piston should be much greater concerns when looking at a stroker setup with a turbo, not the rod-to-stroke ratio.</TD></TR></TABLE>
See sig? Well I'm glad you're convinced, unfortunately the rest of engine building world knows it's true importance.
That's why some D16's are turned into 1.5's. It's also why the D17's suck and no one ever uses them.
Stroking a motor is just a bad idea. Just look at the way an engine was designed to work. Increasing the stroke means the engine has to indure tremendous amounts of stress and waste more energy to reverse the direction of piston travel after every stroke.
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 1,842
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth, TX, USA
Re: (Civic Racer X 7)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Civic Racer X 7 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">silly kids stroking moves torque not JUST increase the displacement</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JunIntegra
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
7
Sep 27, 2003 05:32 PM