my cousin just got a "stock" 2000 ITR...so anyway he decided to take it to the track a couple days ago and ran a 14.411 @ 99.20 mph....i wanna know wtf is goin on....somethin is not addin up right. does anyone else find this a little wierd??? any ideas or just opinions on wat this "stock" ITR might have done to it....?????

 

low 14's high 13's sound about right for a stock ITR.
Im sure others will chime in.
the car was meant for road racing

 

I ran a 14.4 @ 97mph when my R was stock. No biggie.

 

There is wealth of ITR 1/4 mile times here on HT. All you need to do is search for them.

 

14.4 stock for me. No biggie.

 

Just checked the stock timeslip pile....

14.441 @ 95.61mph full interior minor spare + tools - 2.201 60ft.

2600lbs with me (145lbs @ the time) in it.... verified by the digital scale at the track.

yup....nothing weird....

 

nice post title

 

High 13's for a stock ITR??

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by YellowKahuna &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">low 14's high 13's sound about right for a stock ITR.
Im sure others will chime in.
the car was meant for road racing </TD></TR></TABLE>

 

^^^ It's been done, now you have to remove the pass seat, rear seats, jack, spare and run on less than a 1/4 tank and be at a low elevation with correct conditions but it can be done.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by AllMOtrDC2beatU &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">&lt;&lt;&lt; wtf? &gt;&gt;&gt;</TD></TR></TABLE>

When you post a topic, it helps to give it a title that will let people know what's inside. That way, if they know the answer, they'll open the topic and post it. Otherwise, they might just glance at it and not even open it.

For example, if your topic has a title that says "1/4 Mile Times?" it would be more helpful, and more likely to get responses, than one with a title that says "&lt;&lt;&lt; wtf? &gt;&gt;&gt;".

Thank you in advance.

 

14.4 is about right.....

the trap speed seems high....

i ran a 13.9 w/ toda b's and a trap speed of 99.9 mph

 

Impressive!

 

Type R's are overrated

 

The fastest time I've ever seen out of a bone stock ITR is 13.98 on drag radials with a pretty damn good driver.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1GreyTeg &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> nice post title</TD></TR></TABLE>

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by RTW DC2R &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Type R's are overrated</TD></TR></TABLE>

totally

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by YellowKahuna &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">low 14's high 13's sound about right for a stock ITR.
Im sure others will chime in.
the car was meant for road racing </TD></TR></TABLE>

uh.... ok.

what does 'the car was meant for road racing' have to do with quarter mile times?

that seems a little fast for stock. unless he can launch really, really well.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

uh.... ok.

what does 'the car was meant for road racing' have to do with quarter mile times?

that seems a little fast for stock. unless he can launch really, really well.</TD></TR></TABLE>

i think he was just making a point that type R's are pretty quick and it's able to do low 14's stock with no problem.

 

I'm still wondering if the O.P. was upset because he expected it to be faster, or slower?

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by andyt &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm still wondering if the O.P. was upset because he expected it to be faster, or slower?</TD></TR></TABLE>

"any ideas or just opinions on wat this "stock" ITR might have done to it....?????"

he expected it to be slower since he wants to know what the "stock" ITR was done to it.

 

My ITR ran a 13 flat bone stock. Discuss.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by TypeRaceRx1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i think he was just making a point that type R's are pretty quick and it's able to do low 14's stock with no problem.</TD></TR></TABLE>

that statement doesn't make it a 'capable track car', not in any way.

 

HT user: Active Aero wrote a great piece on drag racing the R. I believe he hit mid-high 13's in stock form.

Are you saying 14.4 is no good or too high for a stock R? Seems totally reasonable from what I've read.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris N &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

uh.... ok.

what does 'the car was meant for road racing' have to do with quarter mile times?

that seems a little fast for stock. unless he can launch really, really well.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I was just saying when Honda built the Type R that it was meant for a road course not a drag strip. But hey!, you could drag a stock ITR if you want. Has nothing to do with 1/4 mile times, just my opinion. Low 14's and high 13's are a stock type r 1/4 mile times.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Opie &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">My ITR ran a 13 flat bone stock. Discuss.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I didn't realize there were any 1/8 mile drag strips in the area...