Acura Integra Type-R All Integra Type R Discussions

Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2005 | 11:52 PM
  #1  
Haleiwa-Brando's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,909
Likes: 0
Default Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine

I know this topic has been beaten like a dead horse. Bare with me. I've ordered a header from Hytech which they say is good for a 2.0L high compression engine. I'm simply thinking if I'm going to spend a wad of cash on a header, is there anything out there in your opinion that I should consider and why?

I've been looking at:
Mugen (both headers)
Toda
SMSP
DTR
Hytech

I suppose to better assist in this post, my requirements are going to be gains in the mid and top end. Though I think that's a given.

I've tried to find flow charts, comparrison charts, testimony of 'before and after' and have come up with nothing. It's an expensive part and simply want to make a well educated descision.

Thanks to all that view

Aloha,
Brandon

(Chris F want to do some spell checking? )
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 12:22 AM
  #2  
RagingAngel's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 4,073
Likes: 1
From: The Dirty Hotness
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Haleiwa-Brando)

The only headers worth looking at the ones that aren't from the JDM manufacturers in your list.

(in no particular order)
SMSP
DTR
Hytech

I would add RMF to this as well.

The primary reason I state this is not because I think Mugen/Toda are junk, but rather they never designed their headers to run with a 2.0L applications. Only the USDM tuners have taken Honda power production so seriously to warrant (in this particular discussion) custom headers to be built.

Again, not saying the Mugen/Toda headers won't work....it probably won't allow your motor to reach its intended potential.

Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 04:36 AM
  #3  
Eva01's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,313
Likes: 1
From: I wish I were in..., Osaka, JAPAN
Default

Definately I would go with custom header for 2L. I know that both Hytech or SMSP have designed headers which have been optimized for a 2L. Personally, I would go Hytech but I'm biased.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 04:46 AM
  #4  
Kengs's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,083
Likes: 0
From: Feeling FOBulous
Default Re: (Eva01)

Don't forget Burns Stainless; Casey posted one of their one-off jobs in the All Motor forum.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 04:58 AM
  #5  
Bradstard's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,027
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Haleiwa-Brando)

I've got a custom built AN-R with a 3" collector. I've never dyno'd it against anything else although I almost bought the Hytech. Honestly though, with any of the good ones (Hytech, SMSP, DTR, RMF, AN-R) you'll make good power. Stay away from the JDM crap...
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 05:16 AM
  #6  
Aquafina's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 11,966
Likes: 43
From: Johnson City TN
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Bradstard)

SMSP

Header builder who road races.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 07:27 AM
  #7  
Ekasey's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,788
Likes: 0
From: Charlotte, NC
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Haleiwa-Brando)

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1426596
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 07:29 AM
  #8  
DIFFUT'S INC.'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (-1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,270
Likes: 0
From: NEW YORK CITY, NY, NY
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Casey@Burns)

RMF all the way one of the best headers made today 2.5" for street/track or 3" for all track
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #9  
Black R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default

If you've already ordered a hytech, then the point is moot. Just make sure he knows it's for a 2.0L and your intended stroke, bore, cams, and compresssion + head flow numbers.


And the expression is "bear with me," not "bare with me" - I don't want to 'bare' with you, period.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:03 AM
  #10  
Pondus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Molde, Norway
Default Re: (Black R)

This is true, tell John about your setup and he will build it to match, I guarantee you won't be dissapointed. I have a custom Hytech on my 2.1L engine and it seems to be working good. Just be prepared for a bit of waiting
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:04 AM
  #11  
clayton bigsby's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,527
Likes: 8
From: where it rains 24/7 stay away...
Default Re: (Black R)

found this he is from seattle
http://hondamarketplace.com/zerothread?id=1427935
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:23 AM
  #12  
Dr Pooface's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 4,514
Likes: 1
From: Vancity, b.c, CANADA
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Haleiwa-Brando)

Doesn't Hytech use some "unique" technology such as anti reversion chambers and super secret patented designes?

I think you went the right route, Brandon. A little $$$$ for my liking, but the quality will definately be there.

I might get my car running before you do
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:28 AM
  #13  
rhd's Avatar
rhd
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,872
Likes: 0
From: 03 Sedona WRX
Default

hytech can't even TOUCH the power an RMF or SMSP can produce

personally...RMF would be my choice
next would be SMSP

after that..they all pretty much suck
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #14  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: (rhd)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rhd &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hytech can't even TOUCH the power an RMF or SMSP can produce</TD></TR></TABLE>

Where's your proof of this?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #15  
rhd's Avatar
rhd
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,872
Likes: 0
From: 03 Sedona WRX
Default

5,000 dyno charts all over the internet. customers chaning out cause they want more power. hanging out at 2 different dyno's and seeing it first hand
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:34 AM
  #16  
Reid's Avatar
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 11,470
Likes: 0
From: Yokohama, Japan
Default Re: (rhd)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rhd &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">5,000 dyno charts all over the internet. customers chaning out cause they want more power. hanging out at 2 different dyno's and seeing it first hand</TD></TR></TABLE>

So do you have any dyno comparisons?

I'm not doubting you, but if you're going to make such a bold claim you have to back it up with evidence.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:40 AM
  #17  
Black R's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
25 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 12,949
Likes: 8
From: Atlantis
Default Re: (rhd)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rhd &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hytech can't even TOUCH the power an RMF or SMSP can produce

personally...RMF would be my choice
next would be SMSP

after that..they all pretty much suck</TD></TR></TABLE>


is ignorance truly bliss?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:41 AM
  #18  
Kendall's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 10,289
Likes: 1
From: Hendersonville, NC
Default Re: (rhd)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by rhd &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">5,000 dyno charts all over the internet. customers chaning out cause they want more power. hanging out at 2 different dyno's and seeing it first hand</TD></TR></TABLE>

From what I understand, John builds most of his headers for stock motors and any additional change in volumetric efficiency will adversely effect the power potential of his headers. If you had John custom build you an application specific header that took into account every detail of your build, then you'd make excellent power with it until you did something that again changed the VE. There's no doubt that Dave and Randy build outstanding headers, but just because John does it differently (and often making "picky" headers in the process) doesn't mean that his products are inferior.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 09:48 AM
  #19  
jakeiscool's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 3,798
Likes: 0
From: it was a funny angle
Default Re: (Kendall)

Dyno charts plz
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:02 AM
  #20  
NorthernXposure's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 722
Likes: 0
From: anchorage, ak, usa
Default Re: (JakeIsCool)

i have made 230+ whp on my 2.0 w/ a JUN header... and while it may not be the best out there.. you cant argue w/ the numbers.. makes me wonder if i could pull 240 out of it with a custom header and testpipe
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 10:54 AM
  #21  
92TypeR's Avatar
FSAE
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 1
From: Drinking Beer, UT
Default Re: (NorthernXposure)

Brandon did you order a HyTech? Is it going to arrive here soon?

HyTech does offer a 2.0L header, and it will be better compared to another off-the-shelf header.

However, the DTR, RMF and SMS both will produce more power than the HyTech 2.0L, at least from the charts I've seen. But when it really comes down to it, the difference isn't huge, and if you've already ordered the HyTech I would just stick with what you paid for.

If the header is coming here, I can always do a dyno comparison with my motor
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 02:35 PM
  #22  
Pondus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Molde, Norway
Default Re: (92TypeR)

Unless tested on the same engine, on the same dyno and preferrably also the same day I would think it's hard to back up these claims, can we all agree that all the headers mentioned will give good power?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 03:04 PM
  #23  
itr1244's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,082
Likes: 2
Default Re: (Pondus)

my motor is not 2.0L but this header will work i guess

Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 03:18 PM
  #24  
Jon D's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 11,340
Likes: 1
From: Homie dont, play that, USA
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Bradstard)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Bradstard &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote"> Stay away from the JDM crap...</TD></TR></TABLE>

crap?
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #25  
seek167's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,503
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default Re: Exhaust mani for 2.0L high compression engine (Jon D)

i'm a smsp guy
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:46 AM.