NA Itr
Was wondering what kinda NA ITR set-up you would run if you were looking for around 220whp.
99jdm itr
what valvetrain, cams ect ect
btw: have around $3000-$3500 to spend
already have hondata/i/h/e/high-flow/255 fuel pump
Modified by digital sol at 7:03 PM 10/30/2005
99jdm itr
what valvetrain, cams ect ect
btw: have around $3000-$3500 to spend
already have hondata/i/h/e/high-flow/255 fuel pump
Modified by digital sol at 7:03 PM 10/30/2005
id have around
$3,000 to spend
already have 99 jdm itr swap
short ram intake
jdm header
high flow cat
2.5" greddy catback
hondata
255 fuel pump
looking for more power and have about $3,000 to get me there
i really wanted to boost but that would end up running me more towards like 5-6k the right way with a built bottom end and all so im looking into na options. This way i can have more power but still keep it reliable.
$3,000 to spend
already have 99 jdm itr swap
short ram intake
jdm header
high flow cat
2.5" greddy catback
hondata
255 fuel pump
looking for more power and have about $3,000 to get me there
i really wanted to boost but that would end up running me more towards like 5-6k the right way with a built bottom end and all so im looking into na options. This way i can have more power but still keep it reliable.
Here's how you do it.
1) Sell the JDM ITR motor, Hondata, etc.
2) Get a good deal on a K
3) Swap that in, get header and intake.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">id have around
$3,000 to spend
already have 99 jdm itr swap
short ram intake
jdm header
high flow cat
2.5" greddy catback
hondata
255 fuel pump
looking for more power and have about $3,000 to get me there
i really wanted to boost but that would end up running me more towards like 5-6k the right way with a built bottom end and all so im looking into na options. This way i can have more power but still keep it reliable.</TD></TR></TABLE>
1) Sell the JDM ITR motor, Hondata, etc.
2) Get a good deal on a K
3) Swap that in, get header and intake.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">id have around
$3,000 to spend
already have 99 jdm itr swap
short ram intake
jdm header
high flow cat
2.5" greddy catback
hondata
255 fuel pump
looking for more power and have about $3,000 to get me there
i really wanted to boost but that would end up running me more towards like 5-6k the right way with a built bottom end and all so im looking into na options. This way i can have more power but still keep it reliable.</TD></TR></TABLE>
if you can pull the motor and put it in yourself, i say get some new 82mm 2 or 5cc wiseco pistons, get headwork, springs, retainers, and skunk 2 pro 2 cams and put it on and make 220 with proper tuning.
-Francisco
-Francisco
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">id have around
$3,000 to spend
already have 99 jdm itr swap
short ram intake
jdm header
high flow cat
2.5" greddy catback
hondata
255 fuel pump
looking for more power and have about $3,000 to get me there
i really wanted to boost but that would end up running me more towards like 5-6k the right way with a built bottom end and all so im looking into na options. This way i can have more power but still keep it reliable.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you don't need a built bottom end. small amounts of boost on a stock motor is fine, 7-8psi, and you'd be well above 220hp, and would be spending FAR less than trying to make it 220hp n/a. n/a is always more expensive.
$3,000 to spend
already have 99 jdm itr swap
short ram intake
jdm header
high flow cat
2.5" greddy catback
hondata
255 fuel pump
looking for more power and have about $3,000 to get me there
i really wanted to boost but that would end up running me more towards like 5-6k the right way with a built bottom end and all so im looking into na options. This way i can have more power but still keep it reliable.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you don't need a built bottom end. small amounts of boost on a stock motor is fine, 7-8psi, and you'd be well above 220hp, and would be spending FAR less than trying to make it 220hp n/a. n/a is always more expensive.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ossabB »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">try the FAQs, it might help you to decide what you want to do.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I love you Rob.
On T:
Me = B18C5 bored to 84mm. Sleeved
12.0:1 compression, coated, forged wiseco pistons
Whole Rocket Motorsports valve train (MX22's on the way)
Thinner head gasket
550cc injectors w/ ugraded fuel system
Hytech Header (on the way)
3" exhaust w/ test pipe
chipped P28 w/ Chrome
bootylicious
I love you Rob.
On T:
Me = B18C5 bored to 84mm. Sleeved
12.0:1 compression, coated, forged wiseco pistons
Whole Rocket Motorsports valve train (MX22's on the way)
Thinner head gasket
550cc injectors w/ ugraded fuel system
Hytech Header (on the way)
3" exhaust w/ test pipe
chipped P28 w/ Chrome
bootylicious
I would get my head ported. Get a ported ITR intake manifold to match. 70mm throttle body. Good intake. Toda C cams + cam gears. Portflow valve train. Some 81.5mm Wiseco pistons with a 5cc dome. Hytech header-no cat. Good cat back exhaust. Lots and lots of tuning.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sicteer69 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why would you want an NA build...Turbo it!!</TD></TR></TABLE>
See I would say the exact opposite.
Either of the two lists aboe my post sound good, but there are loads of others. Bradstard's setup is very very nice as well.
See I would say the exact opposite.
Either of the two lists aboe my post sound good, but there are loads of others. Bradstard's setup is very very nice as well.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Haleiwa-Brando »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I love you Rob.
On T:
Me = B18C5 bored to 84mm. Sleeved
12.0:1 compression, coated, forged wiseco pistons
Whole Rocket Motorsports valve train (MX22's on the way)
Thinner head gasket
550cc injectors w/ ugraded fuel system
Hytech Header (on the way)
3" exhaust w/ test pipe
chipped P28 w/ Chrome
bootylicious
</TD></TR></TABLE>
what kind of power are you making with that setup?
On T:
Me = B18C5 bored to 84mm. Sleeved
12.0:1 compression, coated, forged wiseco pistons
Whole Rocket Motorsports valve train (MX22's on the way)
Thinner head gasket
550cc injectors w/ ugraded fuel system
Hytech Header (on the way)
3" exhaust w/ test pipe
chipped P28 w/ Chrome
bootylicious
</TD></TR></TABLE>what kind of power are you making with that setup?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by digital sol »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">jdm header</TD></TR></TABLE>
You do realize that you'll need to replace that with something much better to reach your HP goal ...
You do realize that you'll need to replace that with something much better to reach your HP goal ...
What's the application goal for this power? DD, track, autocross, combination, etc?
And why are you set on NA & 220whp?
Would you even consider FI if these fine chaps showed you the way?
If tracking frequently though ask Chris F what he would and wouldn't do for a future build.
Personally WHP numbers mean nothing to me if tha car isn't balanced, reliable, sorted out and or the driver can't handle or drive it within his abilities.
And why are you set on NA & 220whp?
Would you even consider FI if these fine chaps showed you the way?
If tracking frequently though ask Chris F what he would and wouldn't do for a future build.
Personally WHP numbers mean nothing to me if tha car isn't balanced, reliable, sorted out and or the driver can't handle or drive it within his abilities.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1GreyTeg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Personally WHP numbers mean nothing to me if tha car isn't balanced, reliable, sorted out and or the driver can't handle or drive it within his abilities.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Very well-put and I couldn't agree more.
Very well-put and I couldn't agree more.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 1GreyTeg »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If tracking frequently though ask Chris F what he would and wouldn't do for a future build.</TD></TR></TABLE>
More boost, more loctite.
More boost, more loctite.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Chris F »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
More boost, more loctite.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's where I messed up! Hey guy I sold my Full-Race kit to....send it back
I only used loc-tite on half my stuff. *Slaps forehead.
More boost, more loctite.
</TD></TR></TABLE>That's where I messed up! Hey guy I sold my Full-Race kit to....send it back
I only used loc-tite on half my stuff. *Slaps forehead.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
digital sol
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
10
Nov 10, 2004 05:23 PM




