Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

TYPE R ECU

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 08:55 PM
  #1  
Lauj87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca, USA
Default TYPE R ECU

HEY GUYS I JUST PUT IN MY JDM p73 and wow!...Vtec engagement is alot more noticable but with the p72 i had more power between 4500 rpm and 5600 rpm..soo i don't know if im losing time or gaining time. reason why i did this is because im getting a sk2 IM later on. but what i really want to know is with the type R i know im running rich....but would running rich so besides wasting gas will it damage my motor?
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 09:53 PM
  #2  
kchungb17a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Sunny SoCal
Default Re: TYPE R ECU (Lauj87)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Lauj87 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">HEY GUYS I JUST PUT IN MY JDM p73 and wow!...Vtec engagement is alot more noticable but with the p72 i had more power between 4500 rpm and 5600 rpm..soo i don't know if im losing time or gaining time. reason why i did this is because im getting a sk2 IM later on. but what i really want to know is with the type R i know im running rich....but would running rich so besides wasting gas will it damage my motor?</TD></TR></TABLE>

So you're still running a B18C1 IM with the P73? If so you're not getting IAB activation from it. You're loosing power at the top from that.

Do you mean you had more power from 4500-5600 before you put the P73 ECU in? Again, if you're still running the B18C1 IM, the VTEC engagement from the P73 at 5700-ish is way too late for that manifold, which is costing you that power. I'd recommend you go back to the P72 until you get the Skunk IM, just for the sake of your powerband. Also, don't forget that the P73 gives you a couple hundred rpms before fuel cutoff than the P72. Can your valve train keep up?

As for the P73 running you rich, if it does, I'd doubt it would be by much. It shouldn't hurt anything, depending on actual air/fuel ratio. Better a little rich than lean but too much either way isn't good either. If it is too rich though, damage could be done to the catalytic convertor.
Reply
Old Oct 22, 2005 | 09:57 PM
  #3  
dc2drifterx's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
From: co
Default

The vtec feels like it engages harder because you are losing more power before vtec than your stock ecu. Unless you have mods to warrant using that ecu go back to your p72.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 10:11 AM
  #4  
Lauj87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca, USA
Default

hahaa yeah im going to go back to my stock ecu soon but i like the feel of this one..soo imma drive with it just till i get tired of it :-D
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 11:21 AM
  #5  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: TYPE R ECU (kchungb17a)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by kchungb17a &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">So you're still running a B18C1 IM with the P73? If so you're not getting IAB activation from it. You're loosing power at the top from that. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Without the signal from the ECU, the secondaries should actually be open all the time, so he'd be sacrificing power in the low RPM range, not high. I do agree that it's best to stick with the stock ECU at this point until the modifications warrant switching to the ITR ECU.
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2005 | 03:33 PM
  #6  
Lauj87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca, USA
Default Re: TYPE R ECU (Padawan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Without the signal from the ECU, the secondaries should actually be open all the time. </TD></TR></TABLE>


really? i thought they would be close!?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 05:56 PM
  #7  
kchungb17a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Sunny SoCal
Default Re: TYPE R ECU (Padawan)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Without the signal from the ECU, the secondaries should actually be open all the time, so he'd be sacrificing power in the low RPM range, not high. I do agree that it's best to stick with the stock ECU at this point until the modifications warrant switching to the ITR ECU. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Really?... Is that on OBD2 thing?
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #8  
Padawan's Avatar
Darth ModerVader
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 11,539
Likes: 1
From: Mustafar
Default Re: TYPE R ECU (kchungb17a)

No, it's simply a result of how the secondaries function. The manifold is set up so that the secondaries are normally open (held that way by a spring). When the car is started, power is sent by the ECU to a solenoid which in turn directs vacuum to a diaphragm that closes the secondaries. Once the ECU determines that the secondaries should be open, it cuts power to the solenoid (sources I've seen actually indicate that it's the solenoid's groud that is being interrupted, but the principle is the same either way) and the secondaries then open. If there is no being power sent to the solenoid by the ECU or if there is no vacuum to the diaphragm, the secondaries will remain open at all times.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 07:02 PM
  #9  
kchungb17a's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,290
Likes: 0
From: Sunny SoCal
Default Re: TYPE R ECU (Padawan)

I stand corrected (again). Thanks for straightening it out. I believe the difference between the ground vs power activation depends on whether it's OBD1 (ground) or OBD2 (power).
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 07:41 PM
  #10  
Lauj87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca, USA
Default

OooOoO that would explain why my intake is noticeably louder in the lower RPM'S
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2005 | 08:31 PM
  #11  
Lauj87's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: san jose, ca, USA
Default

soo when the spring is in the down position that means the IAB's are open?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
2kdrift
Engine Management and Tuning
0
May 28, 2016 12:51 AM
poormans_typer69
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
5
Oct 3, 2007 02:32 PM
SkIp_Civic_Ek6
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
1
Jan 16, 2007 10:07 PM
ki3t
Acura Integra Type-R
14
Aug 9, 2004 11:57 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:50 PM.