ok i have a question i know this is in all motor but anyways ....if it was you what would you go b18b1 block b16 pistons b1 rods type r crank built b16 head with ctr cams or would you just go b16 with a t3 garett turbo with 450 cc injectors with a type s bov and a front mount intercooler with a full race turbo manifold ??? just wondering i can drcide so i was thinking maybe you guys could help me figure out what i really want to do and witch you think would be faster i think abiously the turbo but hey who knows

 

I would go with a turbocharge because you would gain more hp and tq faster than n/a. Have you seen those turbocharge car making hp from 300 and up if you did and want those kind of numbers turbocharge is the best way to reach those numbers. N/A is not bad at all because you can throw that motor into a light weight car and still go fast. Turbo charge cost more than N/A. If you on a tight buget go with a N/A it still give you good amount of hp/tq and time on the strip. Yeah turbo are fast but it depend on how you suit up the car.

 

I would go witht the turbo because all motor is way too expensive and in all motor everything has to run right if it doesn't your motor will detonate and all money spent will be useless.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by HONDA RR &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I would go witht the turbo because all motor is way too expensive and in all motor everything has to run right if it doesn't your motor will detonate and all money spent will be useless.</TD></TR></TABLE>

The price really depends on how fast you wanna go and how radical your setup is. I dont know what this guy is talking about that everything has to run right with all motor? That goes for just about any setup n/a or boost. Boost has its fair share of problems also. It basically comes down to money and prefrence.

 

i have a 200whp built lsvtec and i'll be the first one to tell you that its slow and going all motor was one of the bigest mistakes i made.




Modified by riceball777 at 12:51 AM 10/19/2005

 

lol. this is the most ******* on N/A ive seen in the NA forum in a long time. to crazy4hp, you can't compare turbo hp and tq to n/a hp and tq

 

It really matters what kind of car you have and what you want to do.
Go read some FI threads with 300+ HP hondas doing low 13's and high 12's.
I mean if you got a light car for example crx or a hatch, going all motor would be very fast. That one guy with the 200 hp lsv who regrets it. well he has a heavy chassis and he probably cant drive and has a stunna system.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by crxh22project &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">It really matters what kind of car you have and what you want to do.
Go read some FI threads with 300+ HP hondas doing low 13's and high 12's.
I mean if you got a light car for example crx or a hatch, going all motor would be very fast. That one guy with the 200 hp lsv who regrets it. well he has a heavy chassis and he probably cant drive and has a stunna system.</TD></TR></TABLE>
you are right about some thing
i do have have a heavy full weight integra with ac and ps and with a heavey system. thats why my car is slow and if my motor was in a crx i'm sure it will be way faster.
the thing is some ppl like my self like heavery integras like ac, ps, power everything, sunroof and all the good stuff. you can easly make 300+whp and have all this and still be fast with turbo.


Modified by riceball777 at 1:23 AM 10/19/2005

 

i have had a turbo civic hatch 91 with a zc motor and it was fast but i think it was about 230 hp iam not really sure i never dynoed it but i was beating all n/a cars were iam from i have a 88 crx gutted and it already has a b16 in it converted to obd1 i just ripped out the ls i had in there that i stated in the previous thread that i made and the car was shootin flames from the cat but i have fixed that but anyways i think iam about to just boost it i understand the maintnence of a turbo car and a n/a car .............

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by xxwhixx &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i have had a turbo civic hatch 91 with a zc motor and it was fast but i think it was about 230 hp iam not really sure i never dynoed it but i was beating all n/a cars were iam from i have a 88 crx gutted and it already has a b16 in it converted to obd1 i just ripped out the ls i had in there that i stated in the previous thread that i made and the car was shootin flames from the cat but i have fixed that but anyways i think iam about to just boost it i understand the maintnence of a turbo car and a n/a car .............</TD></TR></TABLE>

N/A= Respect when you beat 300 hp hondas. Well for the guy above well yeah of course he is going to need a turbo to haul all that weight around.
I remember when i was an audio nut, now i sold everything because it hurst performance on my crx.