All Motor / Naturally Aspirated No power adders

Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Crank, Rods, Pistons) Your opinions pls.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 01:39 AM
  #1  
DEMNTD1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Guam, USA, USA
Default Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Crank, Rods, Pistons) Your opinions pls.

Planning on building my B18C to 2.0L and would like to receive opinions on which way would be best way to build.

Please note all details of crank size, rod ratio, piston bore size etc. To be used mainly for racing, but would like to cruise around from time to time.

Willing to resleeve cylinders. Would like to be able to rev between 9K to 10K rpms.

Please list your opinions and pros/cons for other opinions provided. THANKS

Example of 2.0L build using:

GSR/Type R stock crank 87.2mm
GSR/Type R rods 1.58 R/S
85mm pistons
1.98L
Cost effective

Crower 92mm Crank
84mm pistons
Crower Rods (? R/S)
2.04L

Crower 95mm crank
84mm pistons
Crower rods (? R/S)
2.10L

Please list other ideas.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 06:43 AM
  #2  
FATBOYeg6's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 688
Likes: 0
From: frozen hell, Vermont
Default Re: Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Crank, Rods, Pistons) Your opinions pls. (DEMNTD1)

you want to rev to 9-10k? i would personally stick with a gsr or itr crank. well me personally, it would be the ls crank and rods. but thats just me. something just bothers me about revving a long stroke short rod engine that high. but thats just me, others may disagree.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 07:05 AM
  #3  
dognutz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 1
From: md, usa
Default Re: Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Crank, Rods, Pistons) Your opinions pls. (DEMNTD1)

bump cause I would like to hear some opions as well.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 07:56 AM
  #4  
mike_belben@yahoo.com's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: not riding any bandwagons in, massachusetts, usa
Default

84.5mm bore
89mm crank
eagle +.137" rods ($350)
rollerwave +.137" off the shelf pistons ($550ish?)
R/S=1.5784

cheap and reliable. more stroke than GSR/ITR with nearly identical RS ratio. i have these parts for sale brand new actually. $650 rings and all
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 11:12 AM
  #5  
Tbone's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 0
From: North East
Default Re: Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Crank, Rods, Pistons) Your opinions pls. (DEMNTD1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DEMNTD1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Example of 2.0L build using:

GSR/Type R stock crank 87.2mm
GSR/Type R rods 1.58 R/S
85mm pistons
1.98L
Cost effective

</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats my setup.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #6  
dognutz's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 386
Likes: 1
From: md, usa
Default Re: Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Tbone)

Thats my setup.[/QUOTE]
Does this only require the block to be sleeved and new pistons with a B18C long block?
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 11:36 AM
  #7  
Tbone's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,295
Likes: 0
From: North East
Default Re: Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (dognutz)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by dognutz &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats my setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Does this only require the block to be sleeved and new pistons with a B18C long block? [/QUOTE]

To acheive that displacement yes. Stock crank with 85mm sleeves and matching pistons.. Now I have alot of other stuff but for the basis of the topic, thats all you need to get to 1.98 (2ltr basicly)
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:29 PM
  #8  
Yell88CRXsi's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 218
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Beach,, Virginia, USA
Default Re: Possible Ways To Build A 2.0L Block (Tbone)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tbone &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Thats my setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>

LOL

Mine too

Hey Mike, do you still have the eagle +.137" rods and +.137" up pistons?

I need a set for a friends motor I'm doing.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 12:54 PM
  #9  
mike_belben@yahoo.com's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: not riding any bandwagons in, massachusetts, usa
Default

yes, all in boxes brand new from Endyn. shipping in the continental US on me
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 08:38 PM
  #10  
DEMNTD1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Guam, USA, USA
Default Re: (mike_belben@yahoo.com)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Tbone &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Thats my setup.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Hey Tbone

I know you have built and tried many setups, what do you think and how would you compare between using the 87.2mm/85mm bore setup and all others using 89mm, 92mm, and 95mm crank.

Shorter stroke we can rev to like 9K, compared to longer stroke. Any reason why you chose the 87.2mm route instead.

Was thinking about it too, but wanted other views and opinions.
Reply
Old Oct 7, 2005 | 09:08 PM
  #11  
DEMNTD1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Guam, USA, USA
Default Re: (DEMNTD1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DEMNTD1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Example of 2.0L build using:
GSR/Type R stock crank 87.2mm
GSR/Type R rods 1.58 R/S
85mm pistons
1.98L
Cost effective</TD></TR></TABLE>

If this is the route I am going to take, should I change the rods to aftermarket as well. If I use the stock rods, I have to get the small end journal machined and insert brass bushing. Will the stock rods hold the power?

What would be a good rod? Carrillo, Pauter, Cunningham, etc.

What would be a good piston? CP, Wiseco, JE, etc.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 07:17 AM
  #12  
mike_belben@yahoo.com's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: not riding any bandwagons in, massachusetts, usa
Default

Eagles are in quite a few more race motors than some folks would like us to believe. look into piston weights, the lighter they are the less tensile abuse on the rod and fasteners.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 07:37 AM
  #13  
WAFFLES's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 5,307
Likes: 1
From: Tulsa, OK
Default Re: (mike_belben@yahoo.com)

I'm currently building a 84x87.2 motor, so technically its a 1.9l. I would like to have went with 85mm bore, but im using the stock B20 sleeves for now.

Revving high is cool and all, but I would prefer something with more stroke and a rev limit of 8-8.5k. I like a nice tq curve that you can really feel.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #14  
92TypeR's Avatar
FSAE
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 5,495
Likes: 1
From: Drinking Beer, UT
Default Re: (WAFFLES)

I run a Benson sleeved B18C @ 85mm
Balanced/micropolished GSR crank
Eagle Rods w/ARP rod bolts
CP OTS 12:1

Love it
Reply
Old Oct 9, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #15  
DEMNTD1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Guam, USA, USA
Default Re: (92TypeR)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by WAFFLES &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm currently building a 84x87.2 motor, so technically its a 1.9l. I would like to have went with 85mm bore, but im using the stock B20 sleeves for now.

Revving high is cool and all, but I would prefer something with more stroke and a rev limit of 8-8.5k. I like a nice tq curve that you can really feel.</TD></TR></TABLE>

You can go 1mm oversize on stock B20 block to get 85mm.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mike_belben@yahoo.com &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Eagles are in quite a few more race motors than some folks would like us to believe. look into piston weights, the lighter they are the less tensile abuse on the rod and fasteners. </TD></TR></TABLE>

Heard that with Eagle rods, it is a bit difficult to match proper rod bearing size. Is this true?

looking for strong and lightweight pistons and rods.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 04:53 AM
  #16  
Pondus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,791
Likes: 0
From: Molde, Norway
Default Re: (DEMNTD1)

Carillo A-beam or Cunningham ultra light would be my choice of rods. I have Cunningham rods and CP pistons myself, in a 92mm x 85mm engine.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 10:10 AM
  #17  
mike_belben@yahoo.com's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,592
Likes: 0
From: not riding any bandwagons in, massachusetts, usa
Default Re: (DEMNTD1)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DEMNTD1 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

Heard that with Eagle rods, it is a bit difficult to match proper rod bearing size. Is this true?

</TD></TR></TABLE>

the two sets that ive owned have been sized very consistently. that may not be a large enough sample to make a judgement about the whole group though. ive heard nothing but praise about them from experienced builders personally.

was somewhat shocked to hear about a pretty bad machining error from Crower by an internet acquaintance in Italy a few months back. i think they refunded him eventually.
Reply
Old Oct 10, 2005 | 08:47 PM
  #18  
DEMNTD1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
From: Guam, USA, USA
Default Re: (mike_belben@yahoo.com)

Was thinkin about Carillo A-beams. How do they differ in weight between the Carillo and Cunningham?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ee8_pt
Honda S2000
59
Jan 12, 2012 01:51 PM
prodragEG
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
1
Jun 8, 2008 08:54 PM
Baggy Spandex
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
6
Nov 1, 2005 12:02 PM
dkim48
Drag Racing
1
Mar 19, 2003 05:06 PM
genius
For Sale
14
Dec 2, 2002 10:16 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:42 AM.