Turbo ITB??
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wantboost »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">yes, tony the tiger has itb's on his 12:5:1 cr integra gsr, gt28rs at 12psi</TD></TR></TABLE>
GT2871R now. I dont think he has posted any updates yet.
<Edit>
Also, EDO has done some ITB/Turbo testing on the K series.
</Edit>
GT2871R now. I dont think he has posted any updates yet.
<Edit>
Also, EDO has done some ITB/Turbo testing on the K series.
</Edit>
all info aside, i thought it was 11.5:1. Has it changed?
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1027496
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1027496
Trending Topics
Sorry guys, no dyno plots or new videos yet... The only reference I can offer is my old GT28RS video you've all seen a while ago. The 28RS turbo didn't last and took a crap so I opted for the larger GT2871R (about a couple of months ago); which meant I had to change everything around it to suit the larger turbo 
I am still testing and experimenting with different plenums for my ITB's. I've also dropped my compression ratio to 10.5:1 right now after the turbo upgrade. 94oct pump gas and a turbo capable of 400WHP won't mix. I don't look forward in making any huge numbers, but rather see how the car performs differently with ITB's. Most likely I will be making another video for you guys to compare because dyno just doesn't show much about the ITB's

I am still testing and experimenting with different plenums for my ITB's. I've also dropped my compression ratio to 10.5:1 right now after the turbo upgrade. 94oct pump gas and a turbo capable of 400WHP won't mix. I don't look forward in making any huge numbers, but rather see how the car performs differently with ITB's. Most likely I will be making another video for you guys to compare because dyno just doesn't show much about the ITB's
These are some videos from about 2 months ago. Setup as follows:
B18C1 1.8L GSR stock sleeves
Forged internals, 11.5:1 CR
GT2871R @ 14 psi
0.86 a/r T25 turbine
Internal WG, HKS T25 manifold
AEM EMS, stock ignition
RC550 injectors
Hayward/Jenvey 51mm ITB's
ITB plenum (2700cc)
Water/Alchy Injection System (175cc/min jet)
First video -- boost/throttle response:
http://jr21777.0catch.com/Tony...e.wmv
Second Video: -- Boost response
http://jr21777.0catch.com/Tony...2.wmv
Third Video -- low-end response and midrange
http://jr21777.0catch.com/Tony...e.wmv
These are some vids just so you guys can get a grasp on how the car behaves with ITB's. It's hard to do a solid comparison, but at least it's something fun to watch
B18C1 1.8L GSR stock sleeves
Forged internals, 11.5:1 CR
GT2871R @ 14 psi
0.86 a/r T25 turbine
Internal WG, HKS T25 manifold
AEM EMS, stock ignition
RC550 injectors
Hayward/Jenvey 51mm ITB's
ITB plenum (2700cc)
Water/Alchy Injection System (175cc/min jet)
First video -- boost/throttle response:
http://jr21777.0catch.com/Tony...e.wmv
Second Video: -- Boost response
http://jr21777.0catch.com/Tony...2.wmv
Third Video -- low-end response and midrange
http://jr21777.0catch.com/Tony...e.wmv
These are some vids just so you guys can get a grasp on how the car behaves with ITB's. It's hard to do a solid comparison, but at least it's something fun to watch
How's the manifold pressure signal with the ITBs?
Autronic suggests running boosted ITB setups in a hybrid MAP/TPS based system where TPS and the manifold pressure sensor is used to calculate fuel delivery. I beleive the MAP sensor is then put in the plenum so that it gets an accurate measure of the available pressure to each runner and throttle angle is used to approximate how much air is actually making it in the motor.
Autronic suggests running boosted ITB setups in a hybrid MAP/TPS based system where TPS and the manifold pressure sensor is used to calculate fuel delivery. I beleive the MAP sensor is then put in the plenum so that it gets an accurate measure of the available pressure to each runner and throttle angle is used to approximate how much air is actually making it in the motor.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by BlackT5 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Tony, what was the cause for your 28RS taking a crap?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Too much anti-lag and insane backfires shattered the bearings
Too much anti-lag and insane backfires shattered the bearings
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by andysila »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hey tony, do you have any pics of your setup?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Check out one of the threads in the fab forum for some pics of my setup:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1394232
Check out one of the threads in the fab forum for some pics of my setup:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1394232
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 99_GS-T »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">How's the manifold pressure signal with the ITBs?
Autronic suggests running boosted ITB setups in a hybrid MAP/TPS based system where TPS and the manifold pressure sensor is used to calculate fuel delivery. I beleive the MAP sensor is then put in the plenum so that it gets an accurate measure of the available pressure to each runner and throttle angle is used to approximate how much air is actually making it in the motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have it set up in a similar fashion with the AEM software, using throttle% vs additional injection maps along with the MAP sensor.
The GM 3bar MAP or the stock Honda MAP sensor had really poor resolution near the 0-vacuum regions and never worked out. I've then swapped to an AEM 3.5 bar MAP sensor and it had great resolution between -0.15 and 0.00 PSI ... I have about 4 load scales between -0.15 to 0.00 PSI which took care of the weak vacuum signal problem and has created enough resolution for fine tuning
Autronic suggests running boosted ITB setups in a hybrid MAP/TPS based system where TPS and the manifold pressure sensor is used to calculate fuel delivery. I beleive the MAP sensor is then put in the plenum so that it gets an accurate measure of the available pressure to each runner and throttle angle is used to approximate how much air is actually making it in the motor.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I have it set up in a similar fashion with the AEM software, using throttle% vs additional injection maps along with the MAP sensor.
The GM 3bar MAP or the stock Honda MAP sensor had really poor resolution near the 0-vacuum regions and never worked out. I've then swapped to an AEM 3.5 bar MAP sensor and it had great resolution between -0.15 and 0.00 PSI ... I have about 4 load scales between -0.15 to 0.00 PSI which took care of the weak vacuum signal problem and has created enough resolution for fine tuning
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by andysila »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">so do you guys think its worth the investment?</TD></TR></TABLE>
NO
Unless you have $$ to wast. I really don't think its worth it at all.
What are you plans for your car?
NO
Unless you have $$ to wast. I really don't think its worth it at all.
What are you plans for your car?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by White Smoke »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">NO
What are you plans for your car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
probably full-race stage 3 gt
built b16 block
built b16 head
walbro 255
rc 550's
p28 w/ hondata s300
much more.
What are you plans for your car?</TD></TR></TABLE>
probably full-race stage 3 gt
built b16 block
built b16 head
walbro 255
rc 550's
p28 w/ hondata s300
much more.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by andysila »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
probably full-race stage 3 gt
built b16 block
built b16 head
walbro 255
rc 550's
p28 w/ hondata s300
much more.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not worth the time and money to run ITB's for that setup at all.
probably full-race stage 3 gt
built b16 block
built b16 head
walbro 255
rc 550's
p28 w/ hondata s300
much more.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Not worth the time and money to run ITB's for that setup at all.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by _gurusan_ »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Tony those links are dead!</TD></TR></TABLE>
I ran out of bandwidth!
I ran out of bandwidth!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




