https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1382288

 

1. you dont know it would put 200whp down on a dynojet
2. 200whp on a dynojet isnt impressive anyway

Nice numbers regardless though.

 

for an i/h/e motor 200whp is damn impressive....

cars come down to rlz's dyno from turbo tune and put down 180s when they were putting down 220s on marks dynojet

for stock internals i am pretty impressed....a lot more impressed than i am about 200whp fully built b16s.....

thanks for the cricism....

 

The only thing im going to criticize is your spelling. Dynojets always give people very high numbers. if you made 200 on a mustang dyno I would be impressed.

 

A dyno is a tuning tool for gods sake. So if i made a custom dyno that an F1 car would only make 1hp on, youd say thats the best dyno?

 

No, im saying there are dynos that give you low numbers IE mustang dynos, and dynos that give you high numbers IE dynojet, dynapack. There is no standard dyno obviously. I am pointing out that an h22 putting down 200whp on a dynojet wouldnt be that impressive.

 

i love this....

you idiots rant and rave about 200whp b16 motors that are fully built and cammed and all that.....and i go and put down the "same" power with just bolt ons and i have to listen to whiney *** over here because thats not that great....


Modified by mgags7 at 8:23 AM 9/26/2005

 

You are taking this too personally. And making 200 whp with a b16 IS more impressive because stock the b16 makes less hp off the bat.

 

why the hell is that impressive....those guys have spent thousands and thousands of dollars and are now out of potential....and have to deal with high *** compression and huge cams.....gas mileage :thumbdown"
daily driveability -

i have only done i/h/e, and spent $1500, and still have way more potential left, and use less gas, and drive smoother....

which is more impressive now....

 

I will agree that 183whp is <U>good</U> for only having boltons. However, I would probably jump off of a building if I spent 1500 dollars to put down 183hp.

 

that is such a joke, that dyno reads low....its more than 183....secondly, you find me another way to make 183whp on THAT dyno for $3200....(motor plus uprgades).....

and you must be on here 24 hours a day...i hope you jump off a building...

 

skunk2 stg 2 cams, dc sports exhaust manifold, crome or uberdata with a decent tune.
Less than $1500 and would most likely produce more hp.

 

bs....the dc is ****....

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=691830&page=4

look on there....stage 2 crowers and full port/polish and high compression valves just made 200whp.....with an upgraded IM and throttle body....

thats a lot more than $1500....dude just give up being a pessimist, that header will help more and more as i get inside the block, whereas that dc crap will just hold you back.....

 

for years the H headers have been the hold back for us
now with RMF and
SMSP making some killer headers we can finally open these things up

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by mgags7 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">bs....the dc is ****....

https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=691830&page=4

look on there....stage 2 crowers and full port/polish and high compression valves just made 200whp.....with an upgraded IM and throttle body....

thats a lot more than $1500....dude just give up being a pessimist, that header will help more and more as i get inside the block, whereas that dc crap will just hold you back.....</TD></TR></TABLE>

wow, great thinking. Porting and polishing wont give you max topend power.