I know, I know, we've all heard it before but here it is.

http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=102867

I wonder what it'd look like. Maybe I'll have a steady job by then so I can afford a new car.

~Alex

 

not horribly excited.


in order for it to be worth it, it'll have to weigh the same as the 88-91s do, as well as look the same. I cant see honda benefiting from changing the design, and we all know they're going to.


i really cant see it doing well. i think its just going to be a huge let down

 

back seat?

Thats not a CRX in no way you style it.

CRX=2 seater.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by LaFawnduh &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">back seat?

Thats not a CRX in no way you style it.

CRX=2 seater.</TD></TR></TABLE>

CRX=4 seater in JDM land and EDM land too

 

Cool, they're bringing the Jazz/Fit over here too.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2fast4udude &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">in order for it to be worth it, it'll have to weigh the same as the 88-91s do, as well as look the same. </TD></TR></TABLE>

are you high? I love how crxs look as much as anyone, but it is a very dated look.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by chri5 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">are you high? I love how crxs look as much as anyone, but it is a very dated look.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I just hope they keep the stunted rear-end look that is so damn sexy. Can't remember exactly what it's called... named after some guy.

 

man if this article is in autoweek........than its legit!

hmm might get one if its in 2007!

 

Autoweek is probably one of the least reliable sources I've came across....

 

The CRX rumor seems to resurface every time a new Civic generation is released . . .

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by 2fast4udude &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I cant see honda benefiting from changing the design, and we all know they're going to.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Do you understand how car companies work? Honda already changed the design, and they're not going to break out some cobweb-having ancient *** bodywork to start building a cult car again. Honda = innovation, thinking that they should build their old stuff is just silly. Just think, if the EF CRX was this good, what will the next one be like? You wouldn't buy a brand new CRX knowing it would have hatch rattles, water leaks, a bad ignitor, a climate control that may as well be made out of glass...

 

how horribley dissappointing

 

notice how there are no pictures of this 2007 crx on that page, hmmmm who gives a **** 2g crx will always be better than any other honda, well that and the 4g civics

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Rexified &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">CRX=4 seater in JDM land and EDM land too</TD></TR></TABLE>


blah, I find it impossible to sit in the back of a JDM crx. It should have been a 2 seater over there as well.

now if they make it a 4 seater in USA, they better have some Ankle room.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by b18cEF9 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">notice how there are no pictures of this 2007 crx on that page, hmmmm who gives a **** 2g crx will always be better than any other honda, well that and the 4g civics</TD></TR></TABLE>

my point exactly. what i said was the new CRX will have nothing on the 88-91s, and they can never rebuild that "magic."


<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drdisco69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">You wouldn't buy a brand new CRX knowing it would have hatch rattles, water leaks, a bad ignitor, a climate control that may as well be made out of glass...</TD></TR></TABLE>

actually, yes i would. i'd rather buy a 91 CRX that has completely holy rockers, worn out quarters, and spits out more blue smoke from the tail pipe then the next one i pull up to, and fix that, then buy a k20 rex that weighs 2500-3000 lbs and looks like complete ***.

in my opinion, they wont ever rebuild or top the 88-91s, and i dont care what it looks like.

just my .02

 

Honestly with how crap these new cars are i've never been more ashamed to own a honda.

honestly I'm about to sell mine looking at its new family members

 

i think this is just more b/s. i mean, how long have people been rumoring about another crx??? if Honda decides to redo it then i guess that's okay, but there is no way i would give up my ef for the "new and improved" line of civics they are producing.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by drdisco69 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Just think, if the EF CRX was this good, what will the next one be like? You wouldn't buy a brand new CRX knowing it would have hatch rattles, water leaks, a bad ignitor, a climate control that may as well be made out of glass...</TD></TR></TABLE>

my climate control is perfect, my car doesn't leak, the hatch doesn't rattle, and my ignitor is fine. it's called taking care of your car. there aren't too many 14-17 year old cars that are in the same condition as when they rolled off the showroom floor. so it's kinda hard to point fingers at some of the flaws on the crx when there are a lot of older cars that naturally have problems that develop over time.