CTR Cams Vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #1  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default CTR Cams Vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams?

Which one is better, I have read several threads with mixed opnions?

these are the threads

http://www.honda-acura.net/for...76041

and

http://www.automotiveforums.co....html
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 09:09 PM
  #2  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

anyone?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 09:40 PM
  #3  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

come on anyone?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 10:19 PM
  #4  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

...
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 10:43 PM
  #5  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

http://www.honda-acura.net/for...76154
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 11:11 PM
  #6  
M15's Avatar
M15
Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,476
Likes: 0
From: Leesburg, Fl, USA
Default Re: (VTEC-Power)

I would say the CTR's are better but then again if you put a set of cams in front of me and a set of headlights Id have a hard time telling you which one was which.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2005 | 11:17 PM
  #7  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

My friend said specs show that the Skunk2 is a little more aggressive than the CTR cams, but only a negligible amount.

Better? As in what sense? Knowing the stage 1 cams have a longer duration? Spending less for the same amount of power? Better build?

Obviously, the CTR cams are the better choice because they are cheaper, offer better build quality, and give about the same amount of power.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #8  
TH33G4MON3's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: NOR, NV, USA
Default Re: (M15)

haha thats a good one go CTR
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 04:07 AM
  #9  
smutmonger's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: dirty, south, usa
Default

i have used both before
never dynoed them

couldnt tell the diff, wish i hadnt spent the money on cams at all much less on the skunk2's

thats about 1000 bucks i will never see again
(that was also in like 2000-2001) lil bit cheaper today
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 06:39 AM
  #10  
c.dub's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
Default Re: (smutmonger)

I'd say go with CTR. Honda makes good ****. I have a video of some group of guys with B18C EK's (Ground Zero Racing or something) and in one video at a track it said one dude was running Toda Spec B cams, and he ended up with a crappier time (not drastically) than when he had his ITR cams in it.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #11  
EFvtec Yo!'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, ga
Default

dude, best bang for the buck would be some ctr's. Can't go wrong with them if you are running a internally stock motor. Now, if you were built and running higher compression on the other hand, i would say go with some aftermarket more agressive cams.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 10:33 AM
  #12  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

ok thx, CTR's is the way I am going
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 10:48 AM
  #13  
Suck my DX's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,353
Likes: 1
From: Pasadena, CA
Default Re: (deviate_si)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by deviate_si &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'd say go with CTR. Honda makes good ****. I have a video of some group of guys with B18C EK's (Ground Zero Racing or something) and in one video at a track it said one dude was running Toda Spec B cams, and he ended up with a crappier time (not drastically) than when he had his ITR cams in it. </TD></TR></TABLE>
there are so many variables in that equation that what u just said doesnt really mean ****...sorry to be so blunt but its true...

CTR cams
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #14  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

thx all
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 12:36 PM
  #15  
91civicDXdude's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,157
Likes: 2
From: Saint Joseph, MO, USA
Default

aftermarket cams will more than likely make more power. the people who "made less power" dont know how to tune the engine and since type r cams are so mild, they crank up the fuel pressure 3 psi and its "tuned", but with a larger aftermarket it takes more tuning to get more power.

look at the specs and compare. generally, a cam with a larger lift and longer duration WILL make more power NA up to a certain point.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 04:41 PM
  #16  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

gotcha
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 05:19 PM
  #17  
CrisEK's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: Chicago Burbs, IL, USA
Default

I agree with the CTR cams being the cest bang for the buck. You don't even need any tuning to make some extra ponies for street driving. Also, Although Skunk2 came are made of chilled iron, they are Made In Taiwan. If your planning not to do much tuning, get the CTR/ITR cams compared to the any stage ONE aftermarket cam. Only difference betwwen ITR & CTR is the intake cam. (but not much at all). Can't go wrong with OEM quality. But max hp can only reach around 200 hp at the wheels when fully tuned with bolt on's. At least I've never seen over 200 hp on stock CTR/ITR cams. Most I've seen was 198hp. (ITR, Hondata,Hytech, & Spoon stuff)
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 09:30 PM
  #18  
CaliforniaHighwayPatrol's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, California, Los Angeles
Default

could I use the CTR cams if I supercharge my car?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 10:53 PM
  #19  
RA122324's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 3
Default

Does anyone on here know why people mix and match them ( CTR Intake, ITR Exhaust)?
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 11:10 PM
  #20  
RCautoworks's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 17,227
Likes: 2
From: Illinois
Default Re: CTR Cams Vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams? (VTEC-Power)

Make sure if you go above 8200, you replace the lma's also.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by knwldge54 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Does anyone on here know why people mix and match them ( CTR Intake, ITR Exhaust)?</TD></TR></TABLE>

Because the ITR and CTR exhaust are the same, or vice versa. But the ctr's intake cam is better. It could be the other way around though. But thats basically why.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #21  
TH33G4MON3's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,221
Likes: 0
From: NOR, NV, USA
Default Re: CTR Cams Vs. Skunk2 Stage 1 Cams? (VTEC-Power)

like I said ctr's... but yeah ctr...
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2005 | 07:51 AM
  #22  
EFvtec Yo!'s Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 703
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, ga
Default

yeah, the ctr intake cam has a little more duration then the itr intake cam.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
gsr x civic
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
9
Sep 29, 2006 01:47 PM
blakacintegera
Acura Integra
26
Jul 21, 2003 12:52 AM
b18c-93
Tech / Misc
4
Jan 6, 2003 06:14 PM
EGkTiOn_CiViC
Drag Racing
3
Dec 3, 2002 02:00 PM
far
Acura Integra
4
Apr 4, 2002 09:52 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:27 AM.