Honda Accord (1990 - 2002) Includes 1997 - 1999 Acura CL

Automatic Trans?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #1  
96_9c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Automatic Trans?

I was curios how reliable an Accord's automatic transmissions are behind a stock motor. Given if your hard on the tranny and dont change the fluids the life will be greatly reduced. But what if the owner(s) have kept up the maintenance on it and driven it in a normal fashion?

I know that Honda has changed there trannys through the years, but I would like to hear some feedback about how they hold up.

Thank You
96_9c1
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #2  
YeuEmMaiMai's Avatar
B*a*n*n*e*d
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,712
Likes: 3
From: Bouncing off of the city bus in Saigon
Default

THE 4 CYL TRANS has great reliability. I have a 1994 LX and my tranny is at 134K and is still running like a champ. The V6 cars have a higher than usual failer rates due to design flaws in the 6th gen and 7th gen cars
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 11:38 AM
  #3  
Elvis1977's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, Ga., USA
Default Re: Automatic Trans? (96_9c1)

I have 138k miles on my 4-cyl 98 accord. Transmission in great shape. A little clunking during downshifts on the automatic transmission, but nothning serious.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 11:42 AM
  #4  
hypnosisracing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,861
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta, GA
Default Re: Automatic Trans? (Elvis1977)

Also kinda depends on what you mean by "hard" on the tranny, some instances of being "hard" on the tranny could lead to nearly immediate failure (neutral drops, etc etc etc)...where as other things considered "hard" on the tranny like fluid changes that are inconsistant, or constant usage of the passing gear will yield much less damage if any at all.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2005 | 11:59 AM
  #5  
96_9c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Re: Automatic Trans? (hypnosisracing)

Im really glad to see such a low failure rate so far among you guys

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hypnosisracing &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Also kinda depends on what you mean by "hard" on the tranny, some instances of being "hard" on the tranny could lead to nearly immediate failure (neutral drops, etc etc etc)...where as other things considered "hard" on the tranny like fluid changes that are inconsistant, or constant usage of the passing gear will yield much less damage if any at all.</TD></TR></TABLE>

What I mean by "hard" is racing from stop light to stop light, trying to get the tires to chirp at every stop, etc...

Thank You
96_9c1
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 03:25 AM
  #6  
96_9c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Re: (YeuEmMaiMai)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by YeuEmMaiMai &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">THE 4 CYL TRANS has great reliability. I have a 1994 LX and my tranny is at 134K and is still running like a champ. The V6 cars have a higher than usual failer rates due to design flaws in the 6th gen and 7th gen cars</TD></TR></TABLE>

Would it be asking to much to try to get 225,000-250,000 miles out of a 3rd or 4th gen trans?

Thank You
96_9c1
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 05:34 AM
  #7  
Elvis1977's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw, Ga., USA
Default Re: (96_9c1)

Yes. If it were a Toyota then I would say the automatic transmission would last 250k easy with routine mainanence of course. But Honda just can't solve their automatic transmission problems and that's why Toyota is better overall. Honda's are great reliable cars too but Toyata's are simply better in the long run. And this is coming from someone who has owned both for many years.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 06:53 AM
  #8  
accordselux's Avatar
Me Gusta History
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,418
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Elvis1977)

I've got a 2000 accord auto and i'm on my 2nd tranny, and 500 into repairs on it. And I drove it nicely. Some 6th gen accord trannys are pieces of ****, others are not.
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 11:34 AM
  #9  
13lue's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: New york, NY, USA
Default Re: (accordselux)

Not to steal the topic but... Is there another auto tranny that will fit in a 98-02 V6 perfectly, other then stock?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 12:22 PM
  #10  
accordselux's Avatar
Me Gusta History
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,418
Likes: 0
Default Re: (13lue)

I believe the TL and CL will, but they'll give you the same problems if youre one of the unlucky ones...
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 07:04 PM
  #11  
96_9c1's Avatar
Thread Starter
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Elvis1977)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Elvis1977 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Yes. If it were a Toyota then I would say the automatic transmission would last 250k easy with routine mainanence of course. But Honda just can't solve their automatic transmission problems and that's why Toyota is better overall. Honda's are great reliable cars too but Toyata's are simply better in the long run. And this is coming from someone who has owned both for many years.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Thats the kind of answer I was looking for

Thank You
96_9c1
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 07:13 AM
  #12  
13lue's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: New york, NY, USA
Default Re: (accordselux)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by accordselux &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I believe the TL and CL will, but they'll give you the same problems if youre one of the unlucky ones...</TD></TR></TABLE> But shouldn't it be better, since it can hold more power then the stock V6?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 08:16 AM
  #13  
accordselux's Avatar
Me Gusta History
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,418
Likes: 0
Default Re: (13lue)

The gearing would be different maybe, but you'll have the same problem. Since the normal trannies cant handle the stock power they make, upgrading to a tranny with the same problem wont really do much. Youll have to check with an Acura dealership or something to verify what years or VIN numbers are affected by the tranny problem.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 11:10 AM
  #14  
13lue's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 121
Likes: 0
From: New york, NY, USA
Default Re: (accordselux)

Do they have a percentage of how many tranny had failed or had problems?
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2005 | 05:08 PM
  #15  
Stealthman80's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Ottawa, On, Canada
Default Re: (13lue)

I bought my car 2 months ago, the tranny shifts almost not noticible if you get it to shift at like 3k if you shift it at like 2k it shifts stiff, I changed the fluid twice and its perfect. also I bought it to a trans shop to make sure it was ok cause I wasnt used to a car shifting that hard they said theres absolutly nothing wrong with it and my mechanic said they just shoft like crap and didnt like honda autos
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
madgeo
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
1
May 28, 2012 12:21 AM
sfcd5
Acura TL, RL & ZDX
25
Apr 26, 2009 05:16 PM
lol at u
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
3
Nov 23, 2006 04:08 AM
vivid 02
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
6
Sep 21, 2006 08:48 PM
Entaka
Honda Accord (1990 - 2002)
5
Mar 9, 2006 05:35 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:38 PM.