are these pipes good for a B-serise log manifold ?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,434
Likes: 2
are these pipes good for a B-serise log manifold ?
hello everybody...
i got these pipes today for very cheap.
are these any good to make a B-serise log manifold?
2" is the outer diamention...
best regards moshik galimidi
i got these pipes today for very cheap.
are these any good to make a B-serise log manifold?
2" is the outer diamention...
best regards moshik galimidi
Junior Member
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
From: Red Deer, Alberta, Canada
they'll work. you might have some clearance issues with the bolts though.
set it up on the flange and see how they clear the holes, that would be the best way.
also you are only going to need 2 of those 90's and 2 T's if you are doing the classic log style manifold.
if you got them cheap enough why not get some more and do a top mount or ramhorn or some other kind of equal length manifold or something with a better collector than the classic log?
set it up on the flange and see how they clear the holes, that would be the best way.
also you are only going to need 2 of those 90's and 2 T's if you are doing the classic log style manifold.
if you got them cheap enough why not get some more and do a top mount or ramhorn or some other kind of equal length manifold or something with a better collector than the classic log?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 7,434
Likes: 2
Re: (cua0)
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by cua0 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">they'll work. you might have some clearance issues with the bolts though.
set it up on the flange and see how they clear the holes, that would be the best way.
also you are only going to need 2 of those 90's and 2 T's if you are doing the classic log style manifold.
if you got them cheap enough why not get some more and do a top mount or ramhorn or some other kind of equal length manifold or something with a better collector than the classic log?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
im not to worried about the bolt clearnce, im gonna crush the side of the pipe that will be welded on the flange so thay will be matched.
ramhorn and top mount are to complicated for me....
set it up on the flange and see how they clear the holes, that would be the best way.
also you are only going to need 2 of those 90's and 2 T's if you are doing the classic log style manifold.
if you got them cheap enough why not get some more and do a top mount or ramhorn or some other kind of equal length manifold or something with a better collector than the classic log?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
im not to worried about the bolt clearnce, im gonna crush the side of the pipe that will be welded on the flange so thay will be matched.
ramhorn and top mount are to complicated for me....
Re: are these pipes good for a B-serise log manifold ? (RACEPAK)
if u're gonna use those i'd highly recommend bracing it . its not too thick. its thicker than needed for day a downpipe but for a manifold i'd be weary on using it .
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
From: Santa Ana, California 92704
Re: are these pipes good for a B-serise log manifold ? (project dc2)
Just for reference sake...
1.5" sch10 pipe = 1.9" OD x .109" wall (1.682" ID)
1.5" sch40 pipe = 1.9" OD x .145" wall (1.610" ID)
Your material = 2" OD x .065" wall (1.87" ID)
The difference in wall thickness is either .044" or .080"...keep this in mind
1.5" sch10 pipe = 1.9" OD x .109" wall (1.682" ID)
1.5" sch40 pipe = 1.9" OD x .145" wall (1.610" ID)
Your material = 2" OD x .065" wall (1.87" ID)
The difference in wall thickness is either .044" or .080"...keep this in mind
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JDMB20TDA
Forced Induction
42
Apr 15, 2006 08:57 AM
