Acura Integra All Integra Except ITR

VAFC II ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #1  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Default VAFC II ?

So in doing some research on this site and team-integra.net. I relized that my cars running a little rich due to the bolt ons. If I get a vafc II I should be able to correct this right? Tell me what you guys think about it. Planning on ordering it ASAP. Just wanna run it by you guys first. 00 GSR by the way.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 07:31 AM
  #2  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Default Re: VAFC II ? (gsrboi80)

bump
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 09:29 AM
  #3  
DC2_005200's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
From: Hawthorne, CA, USA
Default Re: VAFC II ? (gsrboi80)

I had my VAFC II in my 94 GSR, also some of the guys have the VAFC in an 95, 96 and 97 GSR, and my final thought on them is just to get a Hondata system. I mean its great and everything. I love it, but my problem was that when I ran in against a stock ECU it will throw out a check engine for a VTEC problem, so I had it in, but always had to leave it on defult. Now the guy with 95 GSR had to dyno his car and come to find out that he need to rip out his. I means to get the max out of your VFAC you have to dyno it, but when you get to the dyno, mostly everyone recommands Hondata. Plus most of the time Hondata is cheaper and less open. If you leave your VAFC out near your shifter or near your radio, people then to break into your car thinking you have crap to steal. YES THIS HAPPEN TO ME!!!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 02:01 PM
  #4  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Default Re: VAFC II ? (DC2_005200)

bump any other thoughts. Will I definetly throw a cel with vafc 2? If i get HONDATA dont I also need an OBD1 ecu w/ conversion harness and a skunk 2 or similar manifold. because the p28 will not run secondaries on a GSR. I Can get VAFC 2 for a little over $200. Somone let me know what a good option is and what to get. Also everything I need to know. I want to get the ball rolling on this ASAP. Thanks in advance guys.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 04:46 PM
  #5  
AznMTboy's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 232
Likes: 0
From: Santa Ana, CA, USA
Default Re: VAFC II ? (gsrboi80)

hey guys, can u guys tell me what running rich mean ? n wat the other beside rich? wat does it mean to run rich? sorry 4 asking.. cus i seriously dont know.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 04:54 PM
  #6  
honda1982's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: lakewood, CO, U.S
Default

Running Rich mean you have too much fuel in the motor and not enough air. It's won't do too much damage vs. running lean. But after a while the motor will feel the effect. 14.7 a/f ratio is storch(or normal) but when you full throttle you need more fuel vs air in the engine. A turbocharge, supercharge, or nitrous need somewhere 11.5 a/f ratio to 12.5 a/f ratio depend on how much boost they're running.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #7  
honda1982's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 180
Likes: 0
From: lakewood, CO, U.S
Default

For the First question. VAFC is basicly a hack on you ECU. VAFC is useless unless you have Force induction. VAFC is good for beginner who want some control of the motor and fairly easy to tune. But it also mess up your torque curve. A stock ECU have a normal fuel map and you are basiclly hacking it and changes the whole fuel map. With Hondata and AEM EMS you can do more because you are a standalone. You can finner tune you car with standalone vs. VAFC. Time to tune you care VAFC 30min-1 hour. Standalone 4-6 hours. Tune cost $50-$75 hr. So unless you have turbocharge your stock car this is useless!!!
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 05:11 PM
  #8  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Default Re: (honda1982)

Though the fact remains that the car is running rich and needs to be fuel tuned. Anyone else have some more in depth info for me?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2005 | 08:14 PM
  #9  
Racermech's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,987
Likes: 1
From: P Town Yo, ca
Default Re: (gsrboi80)

From what i understand the VAFC is a great tool to do some basic tuning. If you took your car and tuned it with the vafc and dynoed it lets say you got 150hp, well if you did a full uberdata or hondata you might be able to gain a few HP and you would be able to work on the power curve.

For simple bolt on's I/H/E you should not need to tune. If you are running rich you might want to first see if you are throwing any codes, check you plugs/cap/rotor do all the basic maintance first. Ypu might have a sensor going bad and that is causing you to run rich. If this is the case the VAFC will only act as a band-aid.
Once you put cams, or start to do head work that is the time you really need a VAFC or other tuning device.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 01:18 AM
  #10  
teknoracing's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,069
Likes: 0
From: South El Monte, CA, United States
Default Re: (Racermech)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Racermech &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For simple bolt on's I/H/E you should not need to tune. If you are running rich you might want to first see if you are throwing any codes, check you plugs/cap/rotor do all the basic maintance first. Ypu might have a sensor going bad and that is causing you to run rich. If this is the case the VAFC will only act as a band-aid.
Once you put cams, or start to do head work that is the time you really need a VAFC or other tuning device.</TD></TR></TABLE>


Thinking the same thing. You should be running lean if anything if you added I/H/E because youre adding more air and expelling it faster. Check your O2 sensors and your Smog equipment to make sure its running properly
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 05:23 AM
  #11  
Micha's Avatar
FAILWGN
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,295
Likes: 0
From: Who knows these days?
Default Re: (teknoracing)

The ECU normally sees a certain amount of air, so it adds fuel. The problem with I/H/E is that it adds more air, in turn telling the ECU that the motor is running lean(more air,not enough fuel at the O2 sensor) so the ECU sees this and adds more fuel to overcompensate for the added air. So then you run rich.
A vafc just takes certain points over the rpm range and adds or subtracts fuel. Tricks the ecu really. Works, but is not really effective. I was gonna get one till I realized what they really did.
Good luck though.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 05:44 AM
  #12  
IN VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,180
Likes: 3
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Default Re: (honda1982)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by honda1982 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">VAFC is useless unless you have Force induction.</TD></TR></TABLE>
And it's even more useless when you add forced induction to an engine/engine management system that didn't originally have it.

It's a moderately ok solution for OEM supercharged vehicles, but it approaches uselessness when you swap out the supercharging units with different ones.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by honda1982 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But it also mess up your torque curve.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Umm...right.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by honda1982 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">A stock ECU have a normal fuel map and you are basiclly hacking it and changes the whole fuel map.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Changes the WHOLE fuel map, huh? Last time I checked, AFC's can't read and write to and from the ROM. Through an AFC, you can change the MAP input voltage and as a result alter the ignition and fuel outputs, but it definitely doesn't change the fuel or ignition base maps.

Most of the other stuff you said, I can't find enough wrong with the statements to argue against them. So, you're good there.

As for the whole running rich thing, you should use a more accurate and consistent means of measuring what the air:fuel mixtures are than guessing at it and saying, "Hey, you know what Bob....that looks rich to me." Use a lambda meter that employs a wideband UEGO sensor to check your fuel mixtures under various operating conditions.

You can also use certain scan tools to look at the STFT's and LTFT's to see how much the oxygen sensor feedback is trying to correct back to hit it's target fuel mixture.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 06:06 AM
  #13  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Default Re: (Racermech)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Racermech &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">From what i understand the VAFC is a great tool to do some basic tuning. If you took your car and tuned it with the vafc and dynoed it lets say you got 150hp, well if you did a full uberdata or hondata you might be able to gain a few HP and you would be able to work on the power curve.

For simple bolt on's I/H/E you should not need to tune. If you are running rich you might want to first see if you are throwing any codes, check you plugs/cap/rotor do all the basic maintance first. Ypu might have a sensor going bad and that is causing you to run rich. If this is the case the VAFC will only act as a band-aid.
Once you put cams, or start to do head work that is the time you really need a VAFC or other tuning device.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Brand new cap wires plugs and rotor. No codes. I just want to know that the VAFC 2 will help lean it out a little.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 06:33 AM
  #14  
IN VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,180
Likes: 3
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Default Re: (gsrboi80)

If it really is the STFT and LTFT that are causing it to run rich at WOT (from the carryover LTFT), then you need to fix the problem at the root rather than only trimming the WOT fuel back or, God forbid, simply leaning out everything. WOT driving only makes up a small percentage of your driving (I hope). If you lean out the part throttle conditions when it's already too lean, then you'll only increase the amount of positive oxygen sensor feedback and make it add more excess fuel under WOT conditions.

You'll need to have an accurate way of measuring the STFT and LTFT so you can see when you've hit a target of +/-0%. For that, you'll need a scan tool that can read the STFT and LTFT.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 09:35 PM
  #15  
stumpyf4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1
From: Mrs. Sauga, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: VAFC II ? (DC2_005200)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DC2_005200 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I had my VAFC II in my 94 GSR, also some of the guys have the VAFC in an 95, 96 and 97 GSR, and my final thought on them is just to get a Hondata system. I mean its great and everything. I love it, but my problem was that when I ran in against a stock ECU it will throw out a check engine for a VTEC problem, so I had it in, but always had to leave it on defult. Now the guy with 95 GSR had to dyno his car and come to find out that he need to rip out his. I means to get the max out of your VFAC you have to dyno it, but when you get to the dyno, mostly everyone recommands Hondata. Plus most of the time Hondata is cheaper and less open. If you leave your VAFC out near your shifter or near your radio, people then to break into your car thinking you have crap to steal. YES THIS HAPPEN TO ME!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

My VAFC II manual did not have the VTM hookup in the wiring diagram... threw a code 22 after adjusting the VTEC crossover point. Defintley need to hook this up for USDM ECU's... JDM ECU's do require the VTM hookup. Still haven't emailed APEXI USA to let them know there is an error for OBD2a Integras... plan to get this info to them soon so others can problems solve this.

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IN VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">If it really is the STFT and LTFT that are causing it to run rich at WOT (from the carryover LTFT), then you need to fix the problem at the root rather than only trimming the WOT fuel back or, God forbid, simply leaning out everything. WOT driving only makes up a small percentage of your driving (I hope). If you lean out the part throttle conditions when it's already too lean, then you'll only increase the amount of positive oxygen sensor feedback and make it add more excess fuel under WOT conditions.

You'll need to have an accurate way of measuring the STFT and LTFT so you can see when you've hit a target of +/-0%. For that, you'll need a scan tool that can read the STFT and LTFT.</TD></TR></TABLE>

If you're goona use non standard acronmys than you should explain in your posting...STFT = short term fuel trim.... LTFT = long term fuel trim.

STFT and LTFT are always governed by feedback and calculation are made by the by the ECU to determine these values. VAFC cannot change these...the ECU will compensate using fuel trim for whatever VAFC setting you set and get back to it's set parameters. Traditionally Honda errs on the rich side of fuel trim. Look at any honda and you'll see tons of soot in the trail pipe.

You can always reset the ECU when you want to revert back to the original VAFC setting...easy way is to install a switch to remove backup power to the ECU.

To fix the root cause you need to reset the parameters for fuel trim calculations using by resetting the fuel tables. i.e . Hondata, Crome, Uberdata, Power FC etc. VAFC will not do this.

Hope this helps.
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 09:54 PM
  #16  
Integra_drk's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,772
Likes: 0
From: Colorado Springs, CO, United States
Default Re: VAFC II ? (DC2_005200)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DC2_005200 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I had my VAFC II in my 94 GSR, also some of the guys have the VAFC in an 95, 96 and 97 GSR, and my final thought on them is just to get a Hondata system. I mean its great and everything. I love it, but my problem was that when I ran in against a stock ECU it will throw out a check engine for a VTEC problem, so I had it in, but always had to leave it on defult. Now the guy with 95 GSR had to dyno his car and come to find out that he need to rip out his. I means to get the max out of your VFAC you have to dyno it, but when you get to the dyno, mostly everyone recommands Hondata. Plus most of the time Hondata is cheaper and less open. If you leave your VAFC out near your shifter or near your radio, people then to break into your car thinking you have crap to steal. YES THIS HAPPEN TO ME!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

i agree, hondata
Reply
Old Jun 19, 2005 | 11:23 PM
  #17  
IN VTEC's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 10,180
Likes: 3
From: Bloomington, IN, USA
Default Re: VAFC II ? (stumpyf4)

STFT and LTFT are not non-standard acronyms. Unfamiliar to some people, but definitely not non-standard.

Now this is non-standard. I would have preferred re-calibrate.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">reset the parameters for fuel trim calculations using by resetting the fuel tables</TD></TR></TABLE>

If you get the partial throttle STFT and LTFT close to zero corrrection, it'll minimize or eliminate the effects of the LTFT on WOT conditions. That way you won't have to reset the ECU all the time.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 03:50 PM
  #18  
stumpyf4's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 1
From: Mrs. Sauga, Ontario, Canada
Default Re: VAFC II ? (IN VTEC)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by IN VTEC &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">STFT and LTFT are not non-standard acronyms. Unfamiliar to some people, but definitely not non-standard.

Now this is non-standard. I would have preferred re-calibrate.


If you get the partial throttle STFT and LTFT close to zero corrrection, it'll minimize or eliminate the effects of the LTFT on WOT conditions. That way you won't have to reset the ECU all the time.</TD></TR></TABLE>

Yes standard industry terms but non-standard on this message board.

Sorry for the typo... yes you're right; "re-calibrate."

To the original poster: Even without your mods your car ran rich from the factory. Adding a VAFC and tuning it to be more lean will help you but the stock ECU will eventually go back to where it's programmed to be.
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 03:56 PM
  #19  
dc4drewH's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 1
From: round hyaa
Default Re: VAFC II ? (stumpyf4)

still dont understand why you would throw a CEL in a obd2a car w/ the vafc2?
someone care to enlighten
Reply
Old Jun 20, 2005 | 08:24 PM
  #20  
BlackGSRT3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Fl, US
Default Re: VAFC II ? (dc4drewH)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DC2_005200 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I had my VAFC II in my 94 GSR, also some of the guys have the VAFC in an 95, 96 and 97 GSR, and my final thought on them is just to get a Hondata system. I mean its great and everything. I love it, but my problem was that when I ran in against a stock ECU it will throw out a check engine for a VTEC problem, so I had it in, but always had to leave it on defult. Now the guy with 95 GSR had to dyno his car and come to find out that he need to rip out his. I means to get the max out of your VFAC you have to dyno it, but when you get to the dyno, mostly everyone recommands Hondata. Plus most of the time Hondata is cheaper and less open. If you leave your VAFC out near your shifter or near your radio, people then to break into your car thinking you have crap to steal. YES THIS HAPPEN TO ME!!!</TD></TR></TABLE>

agreed to. i bought my turboed gsr and the owner said to get a hondata. last nite my AFC got ****** stolen so imm really pissed off. hopefly theyll pay sum of it and ill be able to get a hondata system.
Reply
Old Jun 23, 2005 | 05:51 AM
  #21  
gsrboi80's Avatar
Thread Starter
Member
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 0
Default Re: VAFC II ? (BlackGSRT3)

the car keeps throwing a code 71 itll go away then come on agian a week or two later.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
9INE_SIXGZR
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
5
Jan 26, 2007 08:13 AM
Bbasso
Acura Integra Type-R
14
Jun 15, 2004 02:18 PM
NMElude97
Honda Prelude
4
Jan 7, 2004 09:41 AM
Champ R
Acura Integra Type-R
8
Nov 21, 2003 03:26 PM
thehondaguru
Tech / Misc
1
Oct 8, 2002 12:36 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:11 AM.