Dissapointing Dyno today (B16 CRX)
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Well, hit the dyno today and turned out a dissapointing dyno. First my setup is...
OBD0 B16
LS cable tranny
AEBS IM
BBK 62mm TB
Short ram intake
CTR N1 crank pulley
Fidanza 8lb flywheel
NKK clutch
Megan stainless 4-2-1 header
Magnaflow stainless 2.5 catback
With that said I was hoping for about 145, but turned out to be 114.45hp and 91 ft lb trq in 3rd gear. The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.
I had been leaning towards boosting again like my past 2 cars (both D series). Or should I swap out trannies and continue building N/A.
Any suggestions?
OBD0 B16
LS cable tranny
AEBS IM
BBK 62mm TB
Short ram intake
CTR N1 crank pulley
Fidanza 8lb flywheel
NKK clutch
Megan stainless 4-2-1 header
Magnaflow stainless 2.5 catback
With that said I was hoping for about 145, but turned out to be 114.45hp and 91 ft lb trq in 3rd gear. The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.
I had been leaning towards boosting again like my past 2 cars (both D series). Or should I swap out trannies and continue building N/A.
Any suggestions?
off topic, but do you have pics of your exhaust system. Im lookin into an oval setup too.
My setup is real similar to yours except I have a ys1 tranny, skunk2 im, 12lbs fly, dc header, no tb or crank pully. I'm hopin for at least 145-150 whp.
My setup is real similar to yours except I have a ys1 tranny, skunk2 im, 12lbs fly, dc header, no tb or crank pully. I'm hopin for at least 145-150 whp.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Autoworks »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, hit the dyno today and turned out a dissapointing dyno. First my setup is...
OBD0 B16
LS cable tranny
AEBS IM
BBK 62mm TB
Short ram intake
CTR N1 crank pulley
Fidanza 8lb flywheel
NKK clutch
Megan stainless 4-2-1 header
Magnaflow stainless 2.5 catback
With that said I was hoping for about 145, but turned out to be 114.45hp and 91 ft lb trq in 3rd gear. The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.
I had been leaning towards boosting again like my past 2 cars (both D series). Or should I swap out trannies and continue building N/A.
Any suggestions?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why? What condition was the engine in when u got it? How many miles? Does it smoke at all at high rpms?
OBD0 B16
LS cable tranny
AEBS IM
BBK 62mm TB
Short ram intake
CTR N1 crank pulley
Fidanza 8lb flywheel
NKK clutch
Megan stainless 4-2-1 header
Magnaflow stainless 2.5 catback
With that said I was hoping for about 145, but turned out to be 114.45hp and 91 ft lb trq in 3rd gear. The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.
I had been leaning towards boosting again like my past 2 cars (both D series). Or should I swap out trannies and continue building N/A.
Any suggestions?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Why? What condition was the engine in when u got it? How many miles? Does it smoke at all at high rpms?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Autoworks »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Well, hit the dyno today and turned out a dissapointing dyno. First my setup is...
OBD0 B16
LS cable tranny
AEBS IM
BBK 62mm TB
Short ram intake
CTR N1 crank pulley
Fidanza 8lb flywheel
NKK clutch
Megan stainless 4-2-1 header
Magnaflow stainless 2.5 catback
With that said I was hoping for about 145, but turned out to be 114.45hp and 91 ft lb trq in 3rd gear. The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.
I had been leaning towards boosting again like my past 2 cars (both D series). Or should I swap out trannies and continue building N/A.
Any suggestions?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those #s are horrible, are you running a cat? and I would recomend doing a compression test to see`what kind of shape your motor is in
OBD0 B16
LS cable tranny
AEBS IM
BBK 62mm TB
Short ram intake
CTR N1 crank pulley
Fidanza 8lb flywheel
NKK clutch
Megan stainless 4-2-1 header
Magnaflow stainless 2.5 catback
With that said I was hoping for about 145, but turned out to be 114.45hp and 91 ft lb trq in 3rd gear. The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.
I had been leaning towards boosting again like my past 2 cars (both D series). Or should I swap out trannies and continue building N/A.
Any suggestions?
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Those #s are horrible, are you running a cat? and I would recomend doing a compression test to see`what kind of shape your motor is in
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Autoworks »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The gears are too long to where it won't even make peak power.</TD></TR></TABLE>
That's not really how it works. Torque is calculated from the gear ratios, so horsepower is the same in every gear. Unless it physically couldn't turn the wheels fast enough to reach the redline, it's reading right.
That's not really how it works. Torque is calculated from the gear ratios, so horsepower is the same in every gear. Unless it physically couldn't turn the wheels fast enough to reach the redline, it's reading right.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Driving the car, you'd never know the # is that low. Sounds beautiful, runs perfectly smooth, no cel, good compression. A/F mix was perfect.
Motor came from HMO, it is fine. Looking at my engine bay is picturesque, I know it has alot to do with the tranny, but I had no idea it would turn out like that.
They made 3 passes on the dyno...
#1 113hp 90tq
#2 114.4 90tq
#3 113.15 90tq
Motor came from HMO, it is fine. Looking at my engine bay is picturesque, I know it has alot to do with the tranny, but I had no idea it would turn out like that.
They made 3 passes on the dyno...
#1 113hp 90tq
#2 114.4 90tq
#3 113.15 90tq
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
I am thinking it has got to be in the dyno. My car runs perfectly fine.
I can't figure it out.
Looking at the gragh, the power is a smooth increase, with the vtec transition at 5k. They let off at 7k but my redline is at 8k. Torque was smooth just like hp. The A/F is consitant on all 3 runs, right at 13. The dyno is a Dynojet Winpep7 in ground.
Driving the car (which I don't do much) is a blast; as far as pulling from a stop into traffic, my zero to sixty is great. It just seems like 2+2=5 right now, something isn't adding up.
I can't figure it out.
Looking at the gragh, the power is a smooth increase, with the vtec transition at 5k. They let off at 7k but my redline is at 8k. Torque was smooth just like hp. The A/F is consitant on all 3 runs, right at 13. The dyno is a Dynojet Winpep7 in ground.
Driving the car (which I don't do much) is a blast; as far as pulling from a stop into traffic, my zero to sixty is great. It just seems like 2+2=5 right now, something isn't adding up.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by asilaydying1984 »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">you think your zero to 60 is great you would like it a hell of alot better then if you got rid of that ls tranny and put a b16 tranny on there</TD></TR></TABLE>
trying to locate one now
trying to locate one now
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Yes, I do. The motor came from a jdm auto (flywheel plate)
I had my tranny already because my first motor I started on was a B18B1, but I sold it and bought the B16. Would the auto cams differ from the 5 sped cams?
I had my tranny already because my first motor I started on was a B18B1, but I sold it and bought the B16. Would the auto cams differ from the 5 sped cams?
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
Damn, I just found this
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1064200
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=896163
So is it the cams, I know it is partially but is there more to it?
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1064200
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=896163
So is it the cams, I know it is partially but is there more to it?
hopefully its just the auto cams. I feel sorry for you dude, my buddy has a fairly beat up b16 in his crx and with i/h/e cam gears pulled 163. One thing you might want to try is a compression test. the first motor we put in his car ran fine and sounded great,but had like 110psi comp. but compared to his new 165psi across all cylinders b16... no comparison
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by EFoneateSI »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">hopefully its just the auto cams. I feel sorry for you dude, my buddy has a fairly beat up b16 in his crx and with i/h/e cam gears pulled 163. One thing you might want to try is a compression test. the first motor we put in his car ran fine and sounded great,but had like 110psi comp. but compared to his new 165psi across all cylinders b16... no comparison</TD></TR></TABLE>
Lose the auto cams. These cost ALOT of power. Get manual B16A cams, GSR cams, or (better yet) ITR/CTR cams. You could also use this opportunity to just go aftermarket (ie Skunk2, Buddy Club, etc.). Just remember that with even B16A or GSR cams, you will need to get double springs for the intake side (auto motors have just singles on the intake side). Also, you will want to check on the ECU. The auto ECU also costs you power.
Lose the auto cams. These cost ALOT of power. Get manual B16A cams, GSR cams, or (better yet) ITR/CTR cams. You could also use this opportunity to just go aftermarket (ie Skunk2, Buddy Club, etc.). Just remember that with even B16A or GSR cams, you will need to get double springs for the intake side (auto motors have just singles on the intake side). Also, you will want to check on the ECU. The auto ECU also costs you power.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
I am going to try to find a good set of CTR's and 01 ITR springs. If not it will be the Crower, SKS1, or BC cams w/ dual springs.
The ECU is a manual, actually the one I bought was DOA, so I am using someone elses ecu
The ECU is a manual, actually the one I bought was DOA, so I am using someone elses ecu
not to hurt your feelings or make you worry even more... but those dynos also tend to give off "high" numbers.
the auto cams will have alot to do with it... but you need to check your compression... in all honesty its got to be more than cams... and i doubt the dyno is that far "off"
my D16a6 made 112.1 whp on a "conservative" dyno... that reads about 12% lower typically than the dyno type you would have used.
the auto cams will have alot to do with it... but you need to check your compression... in all honesty its got to be more than cams... and i doubt the dyno is that far "off"
my D16a6 made 112.1 whp on a "conservative" dyno... that reads about 12% lower typically than the dyno type you would have used.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
No worry, feelings won't be hurt at all. I'm looking into cams now, and will try to get the compression test done again on my lunch break todqay
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Autoworks »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">No worry, feelings won't be hurt at all. I'm looking into cams now, and will try to get the compression test done again on my lunch break todqay</TD></TR></TABLE>
B16A: short 3" intake/4-1 header/60mm exhaust/no cat/fpr/chipped pr3
Dynojet
<--149whp@7700 rpm
<--103wtq
if i had an upgraded TB and AEBS intake manifold. i would seriously be making 160whp 110wtq these ******* are making at flywheel but in whp terms. i could sure use ctr pulley and lightweight flywheel too.
B16A: short 3" intake/4-1 header/60mm exhaust/no cat/fpr/chipped pr3
Dynojet
<--149whp@7700 rpm
<--103wtq
if i had an upgraded TB and AEBS intake manifold. i would seriously be making 160whp 110wtq these ******* are making at flywheel but in whp terms. i could sure use ctr pulley and lightweight flywheel too.
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 11,129
Likes: 36
From: GO AUTOWORKS DOT COM
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by PaImportTuner »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
B16A: short 3" intake/4-1 header/60mm exhaust/no cat/fpr/chipped pr3
Dynojet
<--149whp@7700 rpm
<--103wtq
if i had an upgraded TB and AEBS intake manifold. i would seriously be making 160whp 110wtq these ******* are making at flywheel but in whp terms. i could sure use ctr pulley and lightweight flywheel too.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats what I was shooting for, but oh well. There is someone on here with a set of 00 GSR cams for sale I'm trying to get right now.
B16A: short 3" intake/4-1 header/60mm exhaust/no cat/fpr/chipped pr3
Dynojet
<--149whp@7700 rpm
<--103wtq
if i had an upgraded TB and AEBS intake manifold. i would seriously be making 160whp 110wtq these ******* are making at flywheel but in whp terms. i could sure use ctr pulley and lightweight flywheel too.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Thats what I was shooting for, but oh well. There is someone on here with a set of 00 GSR cams for sale I'm trying to get right now.
if your motor is in fact an auto and your running auto cams swapping them will make a big difference.
i would do a compression and leak down to see how the motor is before i went spending $$$ on cams or other parts.
my b16 with i/h/e made 145hp 105tq
EDIT* made mistake on my actual tq #s. had to check the dyno charts to correct. sorry....
Modified by manson at 10:57 AM 5/13/2005
i would do a compression and leak down to see how the motor is before i went spending $$$ on cams or other parts.
my b16 with i/h/e made 145hp 105tq
EDIT* made mistake on my actual tq #s. had to check the dyno charts to correct. sorry....
Modified by manson at 10:57 AM 5/13/2005






