fully built b16 vs. k20a2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:10 PM
  #1  
highrevnef's Avatar
Thread Starter
Junior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Pasadena, ca, usa
Default fully built b16 vs. k20a2

i was planning on buying a fully built b16 which means the block is sleeved and blueprinted it has high comp pistons port and match port and pollish head/intake manifold /throttle body etc. its fully built. i am gonna pick it up for 4 grand and for my misc parts and labor it would come out to 5-6 grand thats including a p28 chipped and tunned ecu. and i was thinking for that same amount i can have a k20a2 but its stock put in my car. wut do u guys think. the b16 has 15-20 thousand miles on it. and this motor will be going into an ef.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:15 PM
  #2  
SiR Inspired ED7's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 4,538
Likes: 2
From: Riverside County 951, Ca
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (highrevnef)

People would say go with the k20 since much people don't have that swap done. personally i'd stick with the b16 fully built but that's just me. just remember B-Series parts are easier to come by than K-Series...
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
Ronin150's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,609
Likes: 0
From: winter park, fl
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (highrevnef)

You would be spending alot more on the k20 swap than you would on the b16.

Also you said labor so I'm taking it as your going to a shop to get it done at. So it's less likely that they've put a k20 in an ef than a b16.

Me personally I wouldn't want my car to be the first car a shop works on unless they're giving me some kinda life time warrenty where if something mechanically or electrically (something that they might have messed up on) goes wrong they would fix it for free. But that's just me.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:18 PM
  #4  
michael O's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,786
Likes: 0
From: San Jose, CA
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (highrevnef)

I'd personally get the k20 but that's just my opinion. I thought that the k20's were about 6k for the longblock//tranny alone then you have to buy a mount kit (750) or have them made and do all the shift linkage, wiring, etc. It's probably gonna cost 8-10 to get the engine in the car and running.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #5  
krazyblurtzcrx's Avatar
Junior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 1
From: Chandler, az, usa
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (highrevnef)

You know the specs on the motors, the huge price difference. Unless your just trying to get an eyecatcher why would you want to go with the k20 unless you wanted to build that up for more power too, but anyway you dont need more than 300-400 on the street its just going to cost more money than the b16 period. If the b16 is sleeved then use it go turbo, n20, sc or something make some mean power.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
SwissChEz82's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 942
Likes: 0
From: Oceanside, CA
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (krazyblurtzcrx)

I'm sure a built turbo B16 shouldn't have a problem keeping up with a K20.
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 04:56 PM
  #7  
Bjorn20's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,402
Likes: 0
From: MN, United States
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (highrevnef)

id go with the b16, lot easier to get ur hands on replacable parts
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 05:43 PM
  #8  
hondacrx_3's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Plymouth, wisconsin, USA
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (highrevnef)

B16 the K20 would end up costing to much with suspension and other parts
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 06:13 PM
  #9  
88 rex's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,864
Likes: 1
From: Wilmington, De, USA
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (hondacrx_3)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hondacrx_3 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">B16 the K20 would end up costing to much with suspension and other parts</TD></TR></TABLE>

Why? K20 is roughly the same weight.


I personally say go K20a2. The swap doesn't appear to be as painful to do as some are saying on here. Only big thing is that one mount needs to be welded. The wiring can be done on your own if you have the know how, OR you can buy a harness that will P-n-P. K20a2 is the future

I feel that the K series is to the B series, as the B series is to the D series.

JMO.

&lt;------Seriously considering K24a2 or K20a
Reply
Old May 3, 2005 | 07:28 PM
  #10  
kaoss_11's Avatar
B A N N E D
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 6,141
Likes: 0
From: DETROIT DA DIRTY D, MI, US
Default Re: fully built b16 vs. k20a2 (88 rex)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SwissChEz82 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm sure a built turbo B16 shouldn't have a problem keeping up with a K20.</TD></TR></TABLE>its<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by highrevnef &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i was planning on buying a fully built b16 which means the block is sleeved and blueprinted it has high comp pistons port and match port and pollish head/intake manifold /throttle body</TD></TR></TABLE> all motor

Go b series
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ef9gsx
Tech / Misc
2
Dec 17, 2007 07:50 PM
EFin' Kyle
Southern California (Sales)
11
Mar 28, 2006 10:10 PM
matty413
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
3
Mar 10, 2006 07:49 AM
highrevnef
All Motor / Naturally Aspirated
8
May 3, 2005 08:30 PM
s0liDyNe
Honda CRX / EF Civic (1988 - 1991)
9
Sep 19, 2002 12:16 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:32 PM.