what are normal 1/4 mile times for a stock ls motor with i/h/e in a 88 crx si??

 

Too many variables to give you an accurate estimate, but most of the times I've seen on here range from 14.6-15.4 with that engine and mods.

 

k ne one else have any out put on this let me no

 

i ran my friends 90 crx dx at raceway park, it had a 90 ls motor n tranny, wit i/h/e n some lil **** here n there, and i ran a 14.4 with it, altho his best was 15.2

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA91TEGGY &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i ran a 14.4 with it, altho his best was 15.2</TD></TR></TABLE> haha owned (I bet you used your bragging rights to the fullest)

But seriously, if you're hitting low 15's with that set-up I'd be stoked for you. Some guys around here can't hit that with B16's in their CRX's...

 

I ran a 15 flat with an LS swapped hatch, fully gutted. It was at that point I realized that turboing an A6 was way more cost effective than swapping in an LS/b16.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by hatchling37 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">But seriously, if you're hitting low 15's with that set-up I'd be stoked for you. Some guys around here can't hit that with B16's in their CRX's... </TD></TR></TABLE>

Its comments like these that make me love the LS motor. You say that like the b16 is SOOO much faster than the LS. Which i think is plain idiotic. People always tell me that im wrong and that a b16 is so much faster. The thing is...ive never once in my life been beaten by ANYTHING with a b16. Ive raced other crx's with slightly modded b16's and i raced a eg sedan with a HIGHLY modified b16.

Ive never ran in the 1/4...but i was running consistant 9.3's at 73-75mph(75 was personal best N/A). This was done with an intake that was basically a 6 inch piece of 2.25 pipe with a shitty filter, chikara header that was dented all to hell, and a shitty 2.25inch exhaust that bottlenecked to 1.75 at the rear section. Id like to see a wee16 do that

 

No, you misinterpreted me. I was also thinking the overratedness of the B16. It's not much faster, if at all. I was just making a comparison, albeit a bad one in hindsight. It just seems to be a motor some would more identify and want to be associated with just because of VTEC. I don't have anything against the B18. It's a very stout motor and has gobs of torque (well, relatively to other Honda motors), and a ****-load of potential. I wasn't trying to knock it or claim that the B16 is so much better. Sorry for my foul up

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Mr. S &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Too many variables to give you an accurate estimate.</TD></TR></TABLE>