what could be wrong? track times are way too slow.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:19 AM
  #1  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default what could be wrong? track times are way too slow.

ok i finally finished up my car and took it the the track. only thing is im very dissapointed with my time but i cant figure out whats holding it back.

setup is as follows:

91 crx si
b18c1
b16 tranny
skunk2 IM
3" intake tube to stock airbox with k&n filter
dc 4-2-1 header
thermal exhaust
chipped p28 (5300 vtec 8600 rev)
jimfab bar

tires were falken azenis (195/60/14) at 25psi. i know the azenis arent a drag tire but this isnt a drag car either. i really just went to the strip for fun.

the best out of 6 runs:

r/t .789
60' 2.303
330 6.394
1/8 9.734
mph 75.10
1000 12.555
1/4 14.944
mph 95.01

its not the driver. i had 6 runs, and this was the absolute best i could pull out, i even got a 2.2 60' on one run. i was shifting at 8000. i dont know whats wrong. pretty much everything in my setup is new. new dizzy, new plugs and wires, new fuel filter, suspension is new and has pretty much no wear on it, clutch is new. i mean i know the azenis are hurting me and causing me to lose some time, but even despite that i should be faster then this. i year ago my best was 15.0 and that was with a terrible setup(stock IM, stock ecu, ls trans, stock exhaust manifold, crappy shot suspension, no traction bar). but after it was stolen and i rebuilt it to better then it was im still no faster? whats the deal? the car runs and idles perfectly. last time i checked compression it was fine at 210, 225, 225, 215. no check engine lights. no warning lights of any kind. something is causing me to lose power, but i cant think of anything that would cause me to lose power without throwing a code or showing some signs of the engine not running properly. any ideas?

the only thing i can think of is that my timing is somehow way off (i didnt check it since last time i set timing a few months ago), or the compression recently took a dump. i will check both this weekend
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:23 AM
  #2  
EP3_05's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 1
From: West Chester, PA, USA
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (GSRCRXsi)

That is not very good for a b18c1 in a crx. Not to rub it in but for comparison I ran a 14.8@94 in my 91 b16a sedan. I would check compression, leakdown test, and also check both cam and ignition timing. Who chipped the ecu?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #3  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (91civic)

i know its not good. and i know its b16 times im running. im just so pissed that i spent so much time and money rebuilding this thing and making it faster only for it to not get any faster. i got the chipped ecu from a guy on here. his chip isnt the problem. the car feels perfect when driving. and another guy on here droppedcrx si made 178/130 with one of his chips on a gsr. i just dont know what could be robbing power without showing any signs that something is wrong.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:35 AM
  #4  
91civicEX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,365
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, Ca, USA
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (GSRCRXsi)

try using a stock ecu for a gsr.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:37 AM
  #5  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (91civicLX)

i did on one of the runs. 14.95. no change. and with my setup a stock gsr ecu isnt ideal anyway, because of the low vtec engagement at 4400. that why i switched to the chipped p28 with higher vtec point
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #6  
Chase's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 10,137
Likes: 0
From: EMAIL ME at Chase@ChaseBaysOnline.com
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (91civic)

Hmm, does it feel alot faster than 14.9?? I pulled 14.6 (2.3 60-foot) with shitty tires fully inflated on my B16 crx, and 14.2 with 555R drag radials. Maybe it could be track accuracy, thats why i asked if it felt faster... I dunno tho, tough question...hope you figure sumthin out soon
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:38 AM
  #7  
EP3_05's Avatar
Member
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 3,668
Likes: 1
From: West Chester, PA, USA
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (GSRCRXsi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRCRXsi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">i know its not good. and i know its b16 times im running. im just so pissed that i spent so much time and money rebuilding this thing and making it faster only for it to not get any faster. i got the chipped ecu from a guy on here. his chip isnt the problem. the car feels perfect when driving. and another guy on here droppedcrx si made 178/130 with one of his chips on a gsr. i just dont know what could be robbing power without showing any signs that something is wrong.</TD></TR></TABLE>

I was just wondering because i have actually seen some crappy ecu chips out there. What rpm were you launching at? Was it bogging or spinning off the line? The timing would be the first thing Iwould check since it is easy.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 10:44 AM
  #8  
Bserieskllr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: boringville, FL
Default

yea those are kinda slow but i was pulling 14.1's with 95&96 mph traps but i was getting 2.1 60's with 195-60-14 falken azenis on 24 psi so maybe you just need to get a better launch.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #9  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (Bserieskllr)

i think its more then the launch. i didnt really launch at any rpm, i just went off idle. if i tried launching at any kind of rpm it just peeled.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:17 AM
  #10  
Malgerus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,723
Likes: 1
From: BC
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (b16crxkid)

Possibly a blockage in the exhaust system? You're not running a catalytic converter are you?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:18 AM
  #11  
Malgerus's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 5,723
Likes: 1
From: BC
Default Re: what could be wrong? track times are way too slow. (Mr. S)

Also, launching off idle is a sure fire way to go slow. The key is to let it sit at around 3k~ and go, letting the tires spin a bit and hook before giving it full throttle.

EDIT: Just noticed your 60' times. 2.303 is not bad for street tires, but you may be able to do better with a better launch.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:22 AM
  #12  
PaImportTuner's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
From: U don't want any of this PA
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

traction into 2nd and 3rd. and track conditions. or you shift to damn slow wear them syncros out a bit
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 11:24 AM
  #13  
PaImportTuner's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
From: U don't want any of this PA
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

btw if you raced this weekend like i did.. i think every honda owner in the MD/NJ/PA area was running shitty times.

i ran 14.1@100mph about 1.5 months ago and this weekend i couldnt run faster than 15.2@95mph at a track that 2 hours away. i usually go to local maple grove.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:01 PM
  #14  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (PaImportTuner)

i dont know. launching off idle seemed best. any time you spin the tires you are losing time. traction into third was fine. but i spun a little into 2nd. i didnt think i was shifting slow. and i raced at capital raceway near DC. i cant help but think something is wrong though. my 60 foots werent that bad. and the car runs perfect. is there anything that can make the car run slow without showing any signs that something is wrong?
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:23 PM
  #15  
PaImportTuner's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
From: U don't want any of this PA
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

after looking at my slip and your posted time.

your 60' and 330' sucks.. which is basically launching and 2nd gear. i think traction is your problem.

you may be shifting too late or too early outta 3rd. your top end isn't good. im just going by your #s
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:45 PM
  #16  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (PaImportTuner)

yea looking at my numbers i was thinking the top end was pretty bad too. i mean at the 1/8 i was at 75 mph, but only pulled another 20 mph in another 1/8. and the 60's arent that bad considering what tires i was using. azenis completely blow *** for drag. 2.3 isnt that bad for street tires in general. i did manage to get a 2.2 on one run but it wanst my fastest run.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:51 PM
  #17  
Mr_CRX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 1
From: SD, CA, USA
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

I have a pretty similar setup, but I know my times were because of my driving skills (or lack thereof )

Your traps seem really low. I ran a 15.2, but at 101.5 mph. I couldnt get traction to save my life. Launching at about 3500 or so on falken ziex's.

Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #18  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (Mr_CRX)

what tranny are you using? jdm or usdm motor? what trim is your crx? my traps are low. but are on point with my times. you should probably be in the high 13's with that kind of trap, provided you get traction
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:00 PM
  #19  
Bserieskllr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: boringville, FL
Default

falken azenis arent that bad for drag racing i had mine at 24 psi and pulled a 2.15 60' and when i think about launching i would rather spin then bogyou can def cut those times to a mid to low 14 with those traps but i still think the gsr should pull harder.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:02 PM
  #20  
Bserieskllr's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
From: boringville, FL
Default

oh yea and i dont think your traps are on point with your times either notice i have 1 mph on you but 8 tenths in the time.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #21  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (Bserieskllr)

your car is also way lighter then mine. you have a 89 HF, i have a 91 si. im probably a good 2-300 lbs heavier. gearing has differences and causes a lot of differences in trap speed too.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:13 PM
  #22  
PaImportTuner's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
From: U don't want any of this PA
Default Re: (Bserieskllr)

video on the below slip me missing 3rd: http://www.psulpac.org/gallery...os=27



the parts covered by hosting site
1/4... 15.2
mph... 95.42

my 95 and his 97mph is the same you ran. but the turbo del sol couldnt get traction due to stock wheels and suspension. and same for me wheels/tires. track conditions werent the best either.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:18 PM
  #23  
GSRCRXsi's Avatar
Thread Starter
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,057
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD
Default Re: (PaImportTuner)

your problems look to be your 60'. 2.4 and 2.5 are really bad, lol
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:21 PM
  #24  
PaImportTuner's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 2,521
Likes: 0
From: U don't want any of this PA
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRCRXsi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">your problems look to be your 60'. 2.4 and 2.5 are really bad, lol</TD></TR></TABLE>
i think its good for bad oil pressure in head/**** tires/ and bad 3rd gear syncro

i have a jdm s1 trans and **** LeMans all season 185/70/13s i was chriping all the way up to 4th gear even.

and if you compare, your 60' is bad and your 3rd 4th gear area is bad.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2005 | 01:25 PM
  #25  
Mr_CRX's Avatar
Honda-Tech Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 4,914
Likes: 1
From: SD, CA, USA
Default Re: (GSRCRXsi)

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by GSRCRXsi &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">what tranny are you using? jdm or usdm motor? what trim is your crx? my traps are low. but are on point with my times. you should probably be in the high 13's with that kind of trap, provided you get traction</TD></TR></TABLE>

It's a USDM motor, with a 92 GSR YS1 tranny, No LSD. It's in a 1990 DX CRX. Full interior.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:38 PM.