intake manifold jg?? skunk2?
so... well im a dumb and ordered the aebs manifold... i didn't realize that it wasn't
for the GSR.... so here i am debating on what manifold to get... i hear that skunk2 is for
all motor and JG edelbrock is for turbo, but in Tbone's test the JG flowed much better than the skunk2. I know flow doesn't always equal horsepower, but does anyone have experience w/ the two.... which one flowed better in their setup.
thanks
for the GSR.... so here i am debating on what manifold to get... i hear that skunk2 is for
all motor and JG edelbrock is for turbo, but in Tbone's test the JG flowed much better than the skunk2. I know flow doesn't always equal horsepower, but does anyone have experience w/ the two.... which one flowed better in their setup.
thanks
I know I got rid of my ITR (same as skunk2) IM for the JG IM. I don't have any before and after dyno plots. I'm running this on a built 2.0L.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Fat Bradstard »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I know I got rid of my ITR (same as skunk2) IM for the JG IM. I don't have any before and after dyno plots. I'm running this on a built 2.0L.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
are you referring to the jg edelbrock or jg sheet metal??
</TD></TR></TABLE>are you referring to the jg edelbrock or jg sheet metal??
I thought I remembered seeing Tbone comment on the 2 manifolds saying that the JG made similar power but at 800 rpm higher than the Skunk 2 did...
i believe he mentioned that the jg sheet metal had lower flow results but on the dyno it carried power, the jg edelbrock flowed better but ... i want to know its dyno comparison vs the skunk2
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
i v o u s
Honda Civic / Del Sol (1992 - 2000)
9
Jan 27, 2005 03:31 PM




