Azenis RT615 Sizes
Size
185/60R14 82H *** 3rd Qtr 2005 600 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
195/60R14 86H *** 1st Qtr 2005 601 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
195/50R15 82H *** 3rd Qtr 2005 602 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
205/50ZR15 89W *** 1st Qtr 2005 603 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/50ZR15 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 604 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
205/40ZR16 83W *** 1st Qtr 2005 605 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
205/40ZR17 84W *** 1st Qtr 2005 606 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
215/40ZR17 87W *** 1st Qtr 2005 607 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
235/40ZR17 90W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 608 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
255/40ZR17 94W *** 1st Qtr 2005 609 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
275/40ZR17 98W *** 1st Qtr 2005 610 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
215/45ZR17 87W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 611 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/45ZR17 94W *** 1st Qtr 2005 612 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
245/45ZR17 99W *** 1st Qtr 2005 613 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/40ZR18 92W *** 1st Qtr 2005 614 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
235/40ZR18 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 615 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
245/40ZR18 97W *** 1st Qtr 2005 616 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
255/40ZR18 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 617 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/45ZR18 91W *** 1st Qtr 2005 618 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
255/35ZR18 90W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 619 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
265/35ZR18 93W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 620 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
275/35ZR18 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 621 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
315/30ZR18 98W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 622 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
185/60R14 82H *** 3rd Qtr 2005 600 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
195/60R14 86H *** 1st Qtr 2005 601 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
195/50R15 82H *** 3rd Qtr 2005 602 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
205/50ZR15 89W *** 1st Qtr 2005 603 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/50ZR15 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 604 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
205/40ZR16 83W *** 1st Qtr 2005 605 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
205/40ZR17 84W *** 1st Qtr 2005 606 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
215/40ZR17 87W *** 1st Qtr 2005 607 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
235/40ZR17 90W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 608 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
255/40ZR17 94W *** 1st Qtr 2005 609 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
275/40ZR17 98W *** 1st Qtr 2005 610 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
215/45ZR17 87W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 611 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/45ZR17 94W *** 1st Qtr 2005 612 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
245/45ZR17 99W *** 1st Qtr 2005 613 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/40ZR18 92W *** 1st Qtr 2005 614 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
235/40ZR18 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 615 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
245/40ZR18 97W *** 1st Qtr 2005 616 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
255/40ZR18 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 617 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
225/45ZR18 91W *** 1st Qtr 2005 618 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
255/35ZR18 90W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 619 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
265/35ZR18 93W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 620 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
275/35ZR18 95W *** 1st Qtr 2005 621 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
315/30ZR18 98W *** 3rd Qtr 2005 622 $0 Qty.
Coming Soon
Despite what Vulcan Tire says, Falken denies at least some of those dates:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1113942
Jon
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1113942
Jon
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA9 Integra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Still looking for info as to WHY the 205/40/16 Azenis is narrower than the 205/50/15 Azenis.</TD></TR></TABLE>
because thats just how falken decided to make them.
What makes you think that just because you have a bigger diameter the tire should be wider?
because thats just how falken decided to make them.
What makes you think that just because you have a bigger diameter the tire should be wider?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by getfast »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Despite what Vulcan Tire says, Falken denies at least some of those dates:
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1113942
Jon
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I work pretty closely with falken..when these are availible...Honda-tech memebers will know..... I willhave a BIG post for them
here is my previous post on these tires
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1048401
Modified by kineticgsr at 11:03 AM 1/29/2005
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1113942
Jon
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I work pretty closely with falken..when these are availible...Honda-tech memebers will know..... I willhave a BIG post for them
here is my previous post on these tires
https://honda-tech.com/zerothread?id=1048401
Modified by kineticgsr at 11:03 AM 1/29/2005
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA9 Integra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I don't think they should be wider, it just makes sense that all 205's for a given company are the same width.</TD></TR></TABLE>
Agreed.
The problem is that according to Falken's published specs, the 205/50-15 is substantially wider than the 205/40-16. And its not a measuring rim width issue because the 15 was measured on a narrower rim than the 16.
Now what do you say?
--Andy
Agreed.
The problem is that according to Falken's published specs, the 205/50-15 is substantially wider than the 205/40-16. And its not a measuring rim width issue because the 15 was measured on a narrower rim than the 16.
Now what do you say?
--Andy
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Andy Hollis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
The problem is that according to Falken's published specs, the 205/50-15 is substantially wider than the 205/40-16. And its not a measuring rim width issue because the 15 was measured on a narrower rim than the 16.
Now what do you say?
--Andy
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would say that the narrower wheel caused a wee bit of bulging that caused the 15 to be slightly wider.
The problem is that according to Falken's published specs, the 205/50-15 is substantially wider than the 205/40-16. And its not a measuring rim width issue because the 15 was measured on a narrower rim than the 16.
Now what do you say?
--Andy
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I would say that the narrower wheel caused a wee bit of bulging that caused the 15 to be slightly wider.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Andy Hollis »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Agreed.
The problem is that according to Falken's published specs, the 205/50-15 is substantially wider than the 205/40-16. And its not a measuring rim width issue because the 15 was measured on a narrower rim than the 16.
Now what do you say?
--Andy
</TD></TR></TABLE>
According to the Falken 05 data book in my hands the 205-50-15 measures 8.2" on 6.5 inch wheel
the 205-40-16 measures 8.5 on a 7.5 inch wheel
the 205-40-17 measures 8.5" on a 7.5 inch wheel as well
the 215-40-17 measures 8.7" on a 7.5 inch wheel
these are "section width" measurements as well not tread width measurements
section width is sidewall to sidewall.....tread is measured contact width
I don't know where you got your "published specs" but they sound wrong
Agreed.
The problem is that according to Falken's published specs, the 205/50-15 is substantially wider than the 205/40-16. And its not a measuring rim width issue because the 15 was measured on a narrower rim than the 16.
Now what do you say?
--Andy
</TD></TR></TABLE>
According to the Falken 05 data book in my hands the 205-50-15 measures 8.2" on 6.5 inch wheel
the 205-40-16 measures 8.5 on a 7.5 inch wheel
the 205-40-17 measures 8.5" on a 7.5 inch wheel as well
the 215-40-17 measures 8.7" on a 7.5 inch wheel
these are "section width" measurements as well not tread width measurements
section width is sidewall to sidewall.....tread is measured contact width
I don't know where you got your "published specs" but they sound wrong
I'm talking about tread width. I know the 205/40/16 is a wider tire, but the 205/50/15 puts more tire on the ground...
Who knows.... I might just take my chances with the 16" and hope the gearing advantage will make me mad fast y0 on those big national tour courses.
Who knows.... I might just take my chances with the 16" and hope the gearing advantage will make me mad fast y0 on those big national tour courses.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by DA9 Integra »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'm talking about tread width. I know the 205/40/16 is a wider tire, but the 205/50/15 puts more tire on the ground...
Who knows.... I might just take my chances with the 16" and hope the gearing advantage will make me mad fast y0 on those big national tour courses.</TD></TR></TABLE>
I see in the Data book the tread width you are talking about..........
i believe the rim width is th culprit.....but I am on hold with the Tech Dept
just to be sure
waiting for an email from Japan........ where the tires are
Falken is thinking it is a Typo
Who knows.... I might just take my chances with the 16" and hope the gearing advantage will make me mad fast y0 on those big national tour courses.</TD></TR></TABLE>I see in the Data book the tread width you are talking about..........
i believe the rim width is th culprit.....but I am on hold with the Tech Dept
just to be sure
waiting for an email from Japan........ where the tires are
Falken is thinking it is a Typo
The Japanese seem to have trouble converting English to Japanese, and vice versa (visit http://www.engrish.com for an explanation). The term "drive like your hair is on fire" somehow translated to "light your tires on fire please."


