I have a 95 ex...with a hidro tranny...so my question is...If I put in the cable SI tranny with my jdm d16 then would it be a lot better?

whats the difference between EX and SI tranny...SI is short but whats the gear ration on them

 

They are the same tranny. Same gearing and everything.

 

well isnt the SI a cable tranny...I have a hidro tranny so they work different...yeah their the same in gear ration basically then but what about the difference between cable/hidro...jdm d16 ZC vtec...got crower camshaft stage 2 with crower vavle springs and retainners, jun camgear, aem downpipe air filter, 2.25 pipin etc...but what I got shouldnt matter

 

Oh, you mean doing a cable to hydro tranny swap. Don't do it, not worth it at all. It's WAAAAAAAAAYYYYYYY to much work.

 

but what tranny is better the cable or the hidro

 

What cable si tranny are we talking here? The 91 SI? Either way man, theres no reason to, you have a better tranny and better gearing already. Some people go with cable but honeslty i see no reason for it.

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by SOHC4life 96 &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">They are the same tranny. Same gearing and everything. </TD></TR></TABLE>

actually the 92-95 SI had 0.750 5th gear ratio while the EX had a 0.702 5th gear ratio but same in other ratios

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by civictildeath &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">

actually the 92-95 SI had 0.750 5th gear ratio while the EX had a 0.702 5th gear ratio but same in other ratios </TD></TR></TABLE>
Yeah I've had both the EX and 5th gen Si trannies and they're practicaly identical... the difference is barely noticeable

 

I c well I was thinking about going for the jdm vti LSD tranny sounds good to u guyz?