please react , when you used bigger pistons , like 85 MM
or when you used a kit with the longer stroke ??

 

me tarzan. you jane.

 

engrish. speak it. Whats your question?

 

aawwh... can't stop laughing, not sure why...

D

 

I knew a guy who swapped out his 2L Spoon, and went back to 1.8L with JUN III cams due to reliability issue.
When the car was 2L, it spent most of the time in the shop.

 

yeah, no ****, the 2L has some reliability issues to be worked out...seen them die at the track and die on me for that matter...i really think a 81.5mm setup is about the best,safest way to go at this point...

 

I disagree. The way to go is bore, not stroke. People try to put together these wack stroke combos and still try to rev them high - it doesn't work. However, I have personally built and driven a B20 VTEC that was built correctly, and it has no problems at all - except traction. I trusted this car enough to drive it 1800 miles from FL to VA, and the only problem I found was keeping the points off my license

 

That's what happened to the guy's 2L setup. He revved too high and the engine crapped out on him --- several times!
I also think that the B20 would be more reliable.

 

Here's a pic of the R that I talked about (switched from 2L to JUN III). It also has Spoon brakes, Mugen hood, bars, KYB super special suspension, etc. etc. (and yellow recaros!!)



EDIT - if above pic doesn't work, try cut and paste this: http://us.f1.yahoofs.com/groups/g_90...CQ3P8AQDcGLM1z


[Modified by Wai, 5:16 PM 1/11/2002]

 

...mess with the rod to stroke ratio as with the spoon motor and it will **** on you if you spin it up much... go with a bigger bore and it can be as reliable as you built it...