The problem that others will see is that the dynographs seem low by comparison, but keep in mind I did not tune today, the humidity here is 55% and the elevation is over 1000 ft. above sea level. I am pleased to say that on the same dyno, with 30% more humidity, there was a nice flattening of the powerband and a gain on the secondary lobe of 9+ hp over my old well-tuned ITR setup. The only thing I did to the IPS calibration is clean up the composite fuel map. I did those so that I could get a baseline for tuning, which should yield even better numbers of course.

Atlanta sucks for power numbers. An S2000 with an AEM only made 187 hp here, so there is a large disparity in the powers when compared to California (damn elevation and wet air ).

My computer crapped out too, so tuning was halted.

Look how flat the powerband peaked and flattened out. Damn Honda intake manifolds.

The green has a dip because of me testing VTEC engagement. Red is the old ITR graph.

 

nice stuff

 

Nice

 

so what is safe to say the hp that these cams give you??

 

Well, depending on all the variables (location, dyno, etc.) a tuned car with a normal intake, race header, exhaust will see 220-230 whp. IPS has a test car that made 227 on a dynojet with these cams.

 

Bump...

 

<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote &raquo;</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Bump...</TD></TR></TABLE>

No bumping.

 

Sorry man, I didn't know.


I cleaned up my tune on the street a little and it feels a lot better.