Type R trans bolts up to a si motor
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Si tranny and the ITR tranny are identical (minus the LSD).</TD></TR></TABLE>
yup....most true thing i have read all day..
Its 1:23 am and im driiiizunk
yup....most true thing i have read all day..
Its 1:23 am and im driiiizunk
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by B18C-Rsi »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
Its 1:23 am and im driiiizunk
</TD></TR></TABLE>
most true thing I have read all day.
i think you ARE drunk.
Its 1:23 am and im driiiizunk
</TD></TR></TABLE>most true thing I have read all day.
i think you ARE drunk.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by ebelp »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">The Si tranny and the ITR tranny are identical (minus the LSD).</TD></TR></TABLE>
For some reason I vaguely recall reading that the Si transmission, although geared identically to the ITR unit, did not use the same parts internally (i.e., the ITR version utilized certain "stronger" components). I could very well be mistaken though.
For some reason I vaguely recall reading that the Si transmission, although geared identically to the ITR unit, did not use the same parts internally (i.e., the ITR version utilized certain "stronger" components). I could very well be mistaken though.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">
For some reason I vaguely recall reading that the Si transmission, although geared identically to the ITR unit, did not use the same parts internally (i.e., the ITR version utilized certain "stronger" components). I could very well be mistaken though. </TD></TR></TABLE>
true, considering the type r has that crazy VtaK powa yo!
For some reason I vaguely recall reading that the Si transmission, although geared identically to the ITR unit, did not use the same parts internally (i.e., the ITR version utilized certain "stronger" components). I could very well be mistaken though. </TD></TR></TABLE>
true, considering the type r has that crazy VtaK powa yo!
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Padawan »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">For some reason I vaguely recall reading that the Si transmission, although geared identically to the ITR unit, did not use the same parts internally (i.e., the ITR version utilized certain "stronger" components). I could very well be mistaken though. </TD></TR></TABLE>
Another messageboard myth... perpetuated by people who think they heard something about something or another once upon a time.
Different LSD, different ring gear, sprinkle with some fai<FONT COLOR="red">R</FONT>y dust (or without for that weak Si crap) and you're done.
Another messageboard myth... perpetuated by people who think they heard something about something or another once upon a time.
Different LSD, different ring gear, sprinkle with some fai<FONT COLOR="red">R</FONT>y dust (or without for that weak Si crap) and you're done.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by JeffS »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Another messageboard myth... perpetuated by people who think they heard something about something or another once upon a time.
Different LSD, different ring gear, sprinkle with some fai<FONT COLOR="red">R</FONT>y dust (or without for that weak Si crap) and you're done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
When I read it at the time, it didn't seem to make much sense to me (why incur the cost of designing different internal components for an otherwise identical transmission?) so I'm not surprised to learn that it isn't the case.
Different LSD, different ring gear, sprinkle with some fai<FONT COLOR="red">R</FONT>y dust (or without for that weak Si crap) and you're done.</TD></TR></TABLE>
When I read it at the time, it didn't seem to make much sense to me (why incur the cost of designing different internal components for an otherwise identical transmission?) so I'm not surprised to learn that it isn't the case.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by wannabejdm »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Does anyone know where i can find a newer si motor liike a 99 00 or even the new 02's?</TD></TR></TABLE>
anywere just whatever you do dont buy a stolen one... that just gives the thieves the DEMAND that they need to keep on stealing.
anywere just whatever you do dont buy a stolen one... that just gives the thieves the DEMAND that they need to keep on stealing.
are the type r axles necessary to complete the tranny swap? no difference in the splines or whatever (length of the axles?) to make the si axles incompatible?
i may be going w/ a type tranny as well, and want to make sure i have all the parts necessary before i dive into this. it would suck to have the axles be too short or too long and bind.
thanks for any info anybody!
i may be going w/ a type tranny as well, and want to make sure i have all the parts necessary before i dive into this. it would suck to have the axles be too short or too long and bind.
thanks for any info anybody!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




