Question: Pro's/Con's of running a "tight" tire/rim combo..
Lets say for example a 205 on an 8" rim.
I know you get a very nice turn-in, but are there any other pro's/con's?
b/c right now I have 225's on them and I rub if I zero out the camber + hard turn, and I'm pretty sure if I have 205's or even 215's I won't rub @ zero camber.
I know you get a very nice turn-in, but are there any other pro's/con's?
b/c right now I have 225's on them and I rub if I zero out the camber + hard turn, and I'm pretty sure if I have 205's or even 215's I won't rub @ zero camber.
I think what you really want to know is by increasing the rim width will it decrese rollover allowing you to run zero camber while still maintaining a high traction limit.
and that really depends on your suspension and the tire
and that really depends on your suspension and the tire
daily driver most likely
the real question is IMHO
why would you really base a setup to perform only during extreme tire rollover
the real question is IMHO
why would you really base a setup to perform only during extreme tire rollover
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by carl_aka_carlos »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why on earth would you want 0* camber for road racing or autocross?</TD></TR></TABLE>
Well its not really zero.. its just not as negative... real numbers are about -.082-0.84
Well its not really zero.. its just not as negative... real numbers are about -.082-0.84
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sans »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I think what you really want to know is by increasing the rim width will it decrese rollover allowing you to run zero camber while still maintaining a high traction limit.
and that really depends on your suspension and the tire
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't want to increase rim width, I want to decrease tire width and not to have to run excessive camber for the wheels to clear the fender/qtr panel.
The rims are 16x8 and 225's all around. It fits and runs fine as it is but I had to raise the car, and I don't like the 1" gap between the tire/fender.
So I want to know if I go down to 215's or 205's will I have just as good traction?
Any con's to running a setup like that?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sans »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">daily driver most likely
the real question is IMHO
why would you really base a setup to perform only during extreme tire rollover</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes it is a daily driver.
I'm not basing it only on extreme tire rollover, that was just an example.
I'm looking for the pro's con's of the setup.
and that really depends on your suspension and the tire
</TD></TR></TABLE>
I don't want to increase rim width, I want to decrease tire width and not to have to run excessive camber for the wheels to clear the fender/qtr panel.
The rims are 16x8 and 225's all around. It fits and runs fine as it is but I had to raise the car, and I don't like the 1" gap between the tire/fender.
So I want to know if I go down to 215's or 205's will I have just as good traction?
Any con's to running a setup like that?
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by sans »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">daily driver most likely
the real question is IMHO
why would you really base a setup to perform only during extreme tire rollover</TD></TR></TABLE>
Yes it is a daily driver.
I'm not basing it only on extreme tire rollover, that was just an example.
I'm looking for the pro's con's of the setup.
the cons would be excessive tread wear since your in effect pulling the tire constantly and a rough ride similar to 18's with a 35 series tire
Trending Topics
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by Black R »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">why not just roll the fenders to gain more clearance?
I wouldn't want to take away traction..... </TD></TR></TABLE>
Fenders are rolled. 16x8 and a +38 offset.
I might just have to deal w/ the ride height.
I wouldn't want to take away traction..... </TD></TR></TABLE>
Fenders are rolled. 16x8 and a +38 offset.
I might just have to deal w/ the ride height.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by K-Twizzle »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">Fenders are rolled. 16x8 and a +38 offset.
</TD></TR></TABLE>
Roll them some more. If that doesn't work, then cut and/ or flare them.
</TD></TR></TABLE>Roll them some more. If that doesn't work, then cut and/ or flare them.
<TABLE WIDTH="90%" CELLSPACING=0 CELLPADDING=0 ALIGN=CENTER><TR><TD>Quote, originally posted by carl_aka_carlos »</TD></TR><TR><TD CLASS="quote">I'd want at least -1.5* camber up front, with the camber setting you have and some stretched tires you're gonna burn through the outside shoulders of your tires.</TD></TR></TABLE>
ok , cool. I'll just see if i can roll some more.
ok , cool. I'll just see if i can roll some more.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sackdz
Road Racing / Autocross & Time Attack
21
Oct 1, 2003 12:59 PM




